>Chis Nolan's "Dunkirk" reportedly had a 200

>>84131361
First of all, you forgot to add something that makes this look like a spontaneous post rather than shillbottery.

Second - imagine if you will a scenario where people who have the access to attend private screenings to a big money motion picture - basically, executives, investors, associate producers, people on the inside - would say that the film was "disappointing, desu".

Third, if you are a real human being, why would the amount of money spent on it be of interest to us as an opening gambit?

Bravo N'Olan