Why is the 2004 Crash so well known why the 1996 version is relatively unheard of.
Are the general public plebs?
>>84129556
>>84129765
So... Yeah?
The real question is why doesn't Grand Canyon get the credit it deserves for being the inspiration for not only Crash but Magnolia too?
>>84129556
>Crash 2004: a complex story about race, morality, guilt and relationships.
>Crash 1996: Let's crash cars and have sex!
>>84129920
Because grand canyon wasn't the first movie like that
>>84130035
>a complex story
>>84129556
>the 1996 version
it's a totally different movie, it's not a "version" of anything
>>84130035
>>Crash 2004: a complex story about race, morality, guilt and relationships.
>>84130081
It's a film version of the script. Idiot
>>84130035
>Crash 2004: a complex story about race, morality, guilt and relationships.
>>84130073
It was. There were various storylines, some of which crossed over.
Compared to Crash 1994 it was a fucking masterpiece.
>>84130035
>>Crash 2004: a complex story about race, morality, guilt and relationships.
>>84130273
>>84130132
>>84130107
same fag
>>84130299
Yup, I'm not even gonna respond to the prick kek
>>84130299
>same fag
:thinking:
>>84130299
ok.kid
>a complex story
>>84130299
nah
>>84130107
>
>>84130585
this one doesn't mean anything
>>84130035
>Crash 2004: a complex story about race, morality, guilt and relationships.
>>84129556
Yes they are. 2004 Crash was decent, but not Oscar worthy, not that that means much anyway. 1996 Crash is pure kino, maybe Cronenbergs best
>>84130035
im not a samefag. you're a fucking pleb
>>84130916
Perfect ending
>>84130141
I genuinely can't tell if you're being sarcastic or if you think that more storylines == more complex