Book of Henry, the latest film from Colin Trevorrow (Ep. 9),

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-15 at 21.45.14.png (117KB, 563x647px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 563x647px

https://thefilmstage.com/reviews/the-book-of-henry-review-colin-trevorrow/

>Watching The Book of Henry feels like being gaslit. You want to yell at the screen “This is absurd! Henry’s recorded instructions for Susan predict when she’ll turn the wrong way down the street! Is there going to be any acknowledgement of how insane this is?!” while the movie calmly insists that this is all perfectly natural. That kind of rubbernecking-a-car-crash feeling is the only possible reason to recommend the film, if you’re into that, for whatever reason. Going forward, Colin Trevorrow hopefully won’t be put in charge of anything too impor- oh Jesus, that’s right


http://variety.com/2017/film/reviews/the-book-of-henry-review-naomi-watts-1202465743/

>There’s the kind of bad movie that just sits there, unfolding with grimly predictable monotony. Then there’s the kind where the badness expands and metastasizes, taking on a jaw-dropping life of its own, pushing through to ever-higher levels of garishness. “The Book of Henry,” directed by Colin Trevorrow from Gregg Hurwitz’s script, is of the latter, you’ve-got-to-see-it-to-disbelieve-it variety.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/book-henry-1013737?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

>Another group, though, will find acceptance much harder: Those of us who've allowed ourselves to care about the latest Star Wars trilogy may be made fearful about the prospect of an Episode IX directed by Trevorrow.

AUTISMOOO:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz8R2xxeyaA