Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: shakiraproductionphoto.jpg (146KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
146KB, 1000x667px
I'm not sure if this belongs on /tv/ or /mu/ but can someone explain why there are still music videos (even ones shot pre-digital) that are only available in 480p or less? Surely the files or tapes or whatever still exist in some record company vault? I would kill to jack off to some hd Gwen Stefani or Sabrina Salerno.
>>
>music videos
>music
Fuck off back to /g/
>>
>>
File: UnlawfulTartCrow.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1280x720px
>>83947055
Shakira music videos are all you need. The best part of watching vh1 and mtv years ago
>>
>>83947055
The record companies probably just don't have any incentive to re-release them
>>
>>83947873
Augggh but it would be like promotion right? They already spend tons of money on marketing this would be free. I just want to see big Italian pop-star tiddies without artifacts.
https://vimeo.com/143884591
>>
File: 167236_185291378164712_6380174_n.jpg (63KB, 449x600px) Image search:
[Google]
63KB, 449x600px
>liking blonde Shakira
>>
Most of them were shot on film but edited on tape, which is why most of them aren't available in HD that isn't just upscaling.
>>
>>83948019
Record companies would probably kill to get this sort of promotion. Selling their back catalog is some of the creamiest cream that they can get.
>>83949304
But if what this guy says is true then well.....
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3