Honestly, what would you say is the target audience for the harry

>>83942634
Everyone who's not dead inside

Kids who were molested and then begged for more.

Age group i mean. The main characters of the first movies are like 8, but they age throughout the series, so its hard to tell.

File: DESIGNATED SHITTING SPELLS.jpg (112KB, 700x1201px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 700x1201px

Indians

Children and immature women

People with poor taste.

>>83942634

Same as the Manchester suicide bomber, 8-15 year olds

D U L L E ST
U
L
L
E
S
T

people who were bullied as children

>>83942634

kids aged 5 to 10.
autistic males aged 30 to 60.
single women aged 45 and older.

File: mac daddy rank.jpg (548KB, 1616x2896px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1616x2896px

typcial numale millennial that's a fan of dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises? Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>83943036
Weak introduction

God, I hated HP so much back then. One of the worst cancers to blight that era.

>>83942769
The target audience changed. The target audience age is that of the students focused on in any given HP movie. That's why it's kind of difficult to introduce kids today to it because the more recent films are not really suitable, but the older films are too kiddy for older kids.

>>83943071
Yeah anon! I actually liked them though. Better to look forward to each year than capeshit.

Kids ages 8-15
Women ages 8-40