This show does not deserve the name "Sherlock Holmes"

File: sherlock.jpg (67KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1024x768px

This show does not deserve the name "Sherlock Holmes"
>There are barely any clues given to the audience for them to solve the mystery by themselves.
The greatest example of this may be the boomerang murder, where no clues were given.
>Whenever Sherlock finds the answer to something, he either runs away or creates false suspense by withholding the answer while those god damn violins start up.
>Why did they kill off Sherlock, only to show him alive 5 minutes later?
You don't trust your audience to tune in next season?
>Watson is as useful as a submarine without engines.
All he really does is stand around, and work as an idiotic McGuffin
> Moriarty working as a gay crime lord, and everything links back to him
If the stories worked like this, there probably wouldn't be 60 of them
>The fan base
Fan bases can ruin anything they touch if the creators care about what they think, and it is obvious the writers put in some GaY tension for the shippers.
You're better off watching Elementary or an older Sherlock movie.