If the movie focused more on The Mummy and less of Cruise's

>>83866253
Casting sucked. Crowe and the army boss were passable, though. Worst Cruise ever. Will not see this again. Wouldn't have missed anything not seeing it the first time. The Mummy was crummy.

Sofia Butella is ugly as shit and wouldn't have made it if we didn't live in the postmodern lol dude all women are ugly body positive age

File: 1497258109750.png (171KB, 723x350px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 723x350px

tfw no mummy gf

>>83866253
If they wanna follow Marvel they should have done an origin story of the Mummy, played by Tom Cruise. Turn him into the monster 25-30 minutes into the movie and then have him save the world from some laser beam or something,

>make an origin movie about Tom Cruise as the Mummy
>he becomes the Mummy in the last 10 minutes of the film

absolutely fucking lmao

>>83868161
t. ugly, fat, jealous roastie

>>83868512
I'd Sofia her Boutella, if you know what I mean...

File: The-Mummy-Tom-Cruise-and-Jake-Johnson.png (448KB, 1360x565px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1360x565px

>>83868129
First act was great tho

>>83866253
>If the movie focused more on The Mummy and less of Cruise's character, do you think it would have been much better?

Yes. Though I also think it would've been better had they cast someone else instead of Cruise. The whole romance bit with him and the woman felt really forced. Especially since he's more than old enough to be her father.

Also, this hardly even felt like a remake of the Mummy franchise. It had practically nothing in common with the original. It wouldn't even be implausible to actually take it as another sequel to it rather than a reboot.

>>83869069
This movie had more to do with the 1932 movie than the 1999 one

>>83868908
this desu

>>83869105

The only actual nod to the 1999 version was that the Book of The Living falls on the floor during the Mr. Hyde fight.

>>83866253

Things like this really makes me resent the Chinese.

>>83869137
>The only actual nod to the 1999 version
wrong. the opening is just like the 1999 one where when she is being lowered into the ground, THE MUMMY title appears on screen and then images of Egyptian statues is shown as a warzone with terrorists happens

>>83868908
>>83869131
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9euVHT2gw6A

>>83866253
I hope the flop of this garbage sets cruise for wolverine casting.

anyone who wanted a 1999 remake is looking for a different film altogether. this has nothing to do with that film, its a reboot of the monster universe

they should have kept her as an actual mummy for much longer

they should have focused on the terror more than the adventure

they should have cast someone who can move their face to be a love interest. someone who cruise can play off of. hes only as strong as his supporting cast

the underwater scene was quite terrifying. could have had much more impact if they had taken more care over it

everything in london with glass was stupid and painful to watch

the love interest was forced and retarded

they should have killed tom more

it was a popcorn movie and nothing more. im still looking forward to new monster movies. the invisible man is still a fantastic film, and bride of Frankenstein has potential too. if they go full terror with the creature from the black lagoon then they could make something great. they wont though.

File: 7353.jpg (124KB, 1920x640px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1920x640px

>>83870083
>it was a popcorn movie and nothing more. im still looking forward to new monster movies. the invisible man is still a fantastic film, and bride of Frankenstein has potential too. if they go full terror with the creature from the black lagoon then they could make something great. they wont though.

I'm still rustled they're omitting Dracula Untold. That was actually a decent film.

>>83870116
no it wasnt

>>83870067
>not wanting a movie where Cruise teams up with Hugh Jackman who comes back as Van Helsing

File: images (59).jpg (13KB, 531x277px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 531x277px

>>83870083
>they should have kept her as an actual mummy for much longer
THIS. She looked creepy walking around

File: maxresdefault (17).jpg (107KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1280x720px

>>83870948

>>83870218
it was

File: The_Scorpion_King_poster.jpg (21KB, 248x368px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 248x368px

>>83866253
I just watched it. Don't think its salvageable.
Even this movie had more nuance.

>>83866253
>If the movie focused more on The Mummy and less of Cruise's character, do you think it would have been much better?

THE MUMMY could sit still for three hourse reading from a telephone directory and it'd have been much better.

>>83868161
She's a cutie hater.

>>83868161
Strange that somebody with as much to gain from that idea as you should have such a problem with it.

>>83871181
Burn! Roasted!

File: new-valerian-mummy-kingsman-featurettes-696x464.jpg (43KB, 696x464px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 696x464px

>>83868161
She is so beautiful

>>83871201
Fill your boots, anon.

>>83868908
This, aside from the meme-tier companion and shitty quips, everything until that terrible scene where Cruise picks up a stick to beat the Mummy is good.

Crowe is the only saving grace of the next parts.

>>83871215
To you.

>>83871289
Fuck off