The first four episodes were stellar, but the last two have been

>>83834557
> It's an anon doesn't get a show so he keeps posting weekly threads to test the waters and determine whether it's cool already to say it's shit episode

They've been great, it's the release schedule. They weren't conceptualized as episodic. Pick any of the first 4 to watch by itself, and you'll feel as empty as you did after 5 & 6

File: IMG_0643.jpg (52KB, 500x432px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 500x432px

>>83834557
>stellar

>>83834704
it means good retardo

>>83834728
>thinks stellar and good mean the same thing
>calls others retarded
While the first 4 episodes may have good, they were not stellar.

The first 2 episodes were incredible. Episodes 3 and 4 were so bad that they made me not give a shit about 5 and 6.

>>83836093
> Anons who say it's good are lynchfag drones
> Anons who say it's shit are retards who don't get it
> Cannes liked the first two episodes

I wonder how your totally organic personal opinion came to be, sweet anon

>>83834557
>episode 6
>a letdown

You are fucking brain dead

>>83836299
It came to be by watching the show.