Now that the the dust has settled, which film has the best battles of the 90s?
FREEEDOM
>>83752847
Saving Private Ryan because it's way more accurate. Braveheart is laughably bad historically.
>>83753858
>Saving Private Ryan because it's way more accurate
Saving Private Ryan isn't a real historythough.
>>83754379
It's historical fiction, yes. But at least the weaponry and battles to themselves have some semblance to world war 2 history (yes there are a lot of inaccuracies).
Braveheart is completely wrong. Everything from the costumes, weaponry, and the historical battles themselves.
>>83753858
t. english fag
thin red line sean penn running thru the jungle >>>
>>83754508
It's even worse for the Scotts. Braveheart makes scottish people look like a bunch of stone age savages. Truth is, they didn't look much different from the English.
>>83754613
That's part of the charm. The Scots are the loveable barbarians while the English are stuck up cunts.
>>83754613
> Braveheart makes scottish people look like a bunch of stone age savages
They still beat the fuck up of English, so I don't think so.
>>83752847
>Now that the the dust has settled, which film has the best battles of the 90s?
braveheart's battles are actually pretty poorly edited, and stirling is the worst because it has utterly no resemblance to the actual battle
>>83753858
>it's not historically accurate!
I can't believe that I used to believe this was valid criticism.
>>83756182
>:actually pretty poorly edited,
>Braveheart
You sure you've watched the film?
Omaha beach is a better battle than Stirling and Falkirk by a narrow margin, but the film is that and than becomes a drag. Braveheart is the best film overall