>mfw Spider-Man homecoming and Thor get 100% on RT
>muslim murdering wonder Jew only that hiy because of "muh feminism"
You can have your victory now
Yeah, DC shills are really celebrating too early
>Movies with female leads only get good reviews cuz feminism
Is this what /tv/ honestly believes?
>>83410800
Reminder: marvel movies only skate by fresh with 6/10s
(Thor 3 looks decent though . Spider-Man looks like fucking trash.)
>a thor movie
>not being complete shit
>>83410800
>>83411019
Bumping your own consolewars thread
Saged faggot
>>83411378
Kys
>yes yes well done DC sjw feminists well done
>HOWEVER
jesus man
get ahold of yourself. how embarrassing.
>>83410800
>>83411019
Good job!
>>83412251
Black Panther is a surefire 99/100%, no way a lot of reviewers are gonna criticize it.
>>83410800
>>83411019
Excellent tactic shitskins from sweden
Remember you're not /tv/
>>83410800
>>83411019
gr8 b8
>>83412107
Name one good thor movie
>>83411121
>Is this what /tv/ honestly believes?
Not really, but I really think it gets more praise because female hero solo movie in a decade
>>83412621
thor
Who the fuck cares about rotten tomatoes score aside from casuals?
Lmao
>>83413928
Ebin
>/tv/ when a bunch of Marvel flicks get good reviews on Rotten Tomatoes
>"b-b-b-but paid shills!!!"
>"normies will watch literally anything!!!"
>"the rt score means nothing, it's still shit!!!"
>"only redditors actually like these films!!!"
>/tv/ when a single DC flick gets good reviews on Rotten Tomatoes
>"BASED DC WINS AGAIN!!!"
>"CERTIFIED KINO!!!"
>"MARVELDRONES BTFO!!!"
>"THE SCORES DON'T LIE, IT'S A SUCCESS!!!"
So which one is it? Is RT a reliable indicator of a movie's quality or not?