Is this movie worth seeing? It comes out on my birthday and I'm

>>83381217
No
The effects are trash with Green screen being omnipresent and obvious

The use of Slow Moe~~ is fucking disgusting

Gadot cannot change her facial expression leading to Trevor acting leaps and fucking bounds over her. When you watch the movie just concentrate and you can hear the director shouting off stage, "ALRIGHT NOW YOUR CONFIDENT. NO MORE SERIOUS, AH FUCK IT"

The overarching plot is absolutely uninteresting to anyone who has scene a movie. It offers fuck all new or original.

The movie is a solid 6/10 but I dislike Gadots acting far to much and give it a 5.5/10

>>83381217

It is about a superhero; so no.

>>83381258
this sums it up

Is it bad that I don't want to see this movie because Gal Gadot isn't very attractive?

>>83382790
No my child, Wonder Woman was blessed by Aphrodite to always be beautiful. Gal Gadot was blessed bat Ratatouille with shit facial aesthetic

>>83381258
Gay evansposter

File: 1432377021621.jpg (803KB, 2000x1087px) Image search: [Google]

803KB, 2000x1087px

>>83383297
Bruce Jenner would make a more convincing Wonder Woman then Gal gadot

>>83382790
I agree, it really fucks my shit up when Jamie Alexander could have been Wonder Woman instead of her

>>83383340
more convincing than a 97% on RT?

There used to be a time when a bad movie was signified by changing music pace and screen speed editing but now that's all the norm.

>>83383430
Just think they could get that and save money on reviews

Posting in a shill thread. Hidden.

>>83383390
>Jamie Alexander
but she can't act

>>83381217
It's good. It came out early in my country, I've seen it already. It's not 97% good, but it's an enjoyable film. I'd give it maybe a 8/10.


Also happy birthday anon!