>I WILL KILL YOU IN PLAIN SIGHT RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE HEADMASTER'S

Why do magic users need maids anyway

>>83334572
>dumbledore is a faggot, and won't kill me, I'm rich as fuck, and the dark lord will return and get me out of azkaban.

bad logic all around.

most boring franchise yadda yadda yadda

File: 1483418897402.jpg (548KB, 1616x2896px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1616x2896px

Alright then, let’s get down to business. In regards to the OP, wouldn’t you kill children randomly in plain sight too if you were forced to watch, let alone star in, an adaption of one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: poop-goblin.gif (986KB, 420x227px) Image search: [Google]

986KB, 420x227px

>>83334572
did some say goblin?

File: Cruise Guffaws.gif (453KB, 280x207px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 280x207px

>>83334619
>he does his own magic

>>83334684
I always found illusion/thrall magic appealing

get an army of pawns to do your bidding, is way better than having alot of mana and being killable.

>>83334681
>image not troll.png
>that shitty intro
5/10 don't meme again

>>83334681
>1984
>above Brave New World

>Hamlet
>low-tier

>The Great Gatsby
>God-tier

>>83334572
>Voldemort
>half-blood
>fronts as pure-plood
>wants to eradicate non-pure blooded wizards

>Hitler
>black hair and brown eyes
>fronts as pure-blood Aryan
>wants to eradicate non-Aryans

Bravo, Rowling.

>about to perform an illegal spell in front of everyone
Fucking stupid.

>>83334682
fuck you I didn't recognize the thumbnail god damn im spooked now FUCK