I watched this by chance and holy molly, how is nobody here talking

>>83292619
>I mean this is 100 percent /tv/ material

Shit? Garbage? Pus? vomit?

do I want to watch this or pumpkin head 1 and 2
thanks
have a nice one

>>83292669
watch this, this movie is so much fun

>>83292619
I just finished it about 20 min ago.
Thought it was pretty decent but nothing extraordinary.
The cinematography was based in the beginning and then kind of fell off.
Pretty pissed at seeing more CGI deer in movies too.

>>83292720

for me it felt like fresh air you know. Maybe I'm a little over exited because I can't remember when was the last time I had such a good time watching a movie

>>83292841
It was a good time and the story was fairly good but a little too shutter islandy in some parts.

>>83292910
yeah but much cheesier and lovecfraty

It reminded me of this article I read once which described the vampire story as the feudal world reasserting itself to show the limits of the "rational" capitalist order that took its place. Dane DeHaan's character and the business he represents is just as exploitative as Jason Isaacs' in his own way.

>http://www.e-flux.com/journal/76/72878/what-can-we-learn-from-vampires-and-idiots/
>At the beginning of the nineteenth century, the figure of the vampire emerged in European culture at the same time as the birth of political conservativism. This vampire, first appearing in the pages of a well-known novel by John Polidori, was completely unlike the insurgent corpse of today’s popular superstitions. The new vampire was a Byronic beauty, an intellectual, and an aristocrat whose easy prey were the naive, enlightened representatives of high society, for whom there existed nothing beyond the limits of a rational, knowable world. The vampire carried out its attacks with impunity, existing on the frontier between the rational world of the living and the irrational world of the dead—the latter having been denied and displaced by the Enlightenment.
>An astute representative of the retreating pre-bourgeois era which the bourgeois could not completely bury, the aristocratic vampire posessed the secret of its unconscious. He alone was capable of revealing the contingencies of the Enlightenment’s triumph, its hidden ambiguities and limitations.

>>83292956
>Such were the first astute conservative critics of the French Revolution, such as de Maistre and Burke. They did not deny the Revolution itself—did not doubt its significance as a colossal transformation. Indeed, for them it signified something greater than it did for the revolutionaries themselves. These critics were able to discern how the revolution conceived of itself (i.e., as the triumphant victory of reason over prejudice) and posit its place in an enduring history which was essentially represented as a grand conglomeration of prejudices. Behind the illusion of the triumph of freedom, the conservatives saw dependence on, and restraint by, circumstances.

>>83292956

you know, I was thinking something on the lines of vampirism with extra steps when I finished it