Why doesn't Sony just quit the movie industry? Especially

>>83035524
This film will make a profit because people will pay to see it just to see how bad it is. It will be number one at the box office the weekend it's released. It will do well enough to warrant a sequel.

Screencap this post.

>>83035524
I predict this will make a fuckton of money and become the next Tansformers (universally panned films that people love for whatever reason). It will be the death of cinema.

>>83036678

Transformers the first was a good movie, tho. All the sequels after it sucked

Pretty cheap to make this movie.

File: cia.png (537KB, 569x802px) Image search: [Google]

537KB, 569x802px

>>83038089
Not even on this contrarian shithole will anybody unironically defend Michael Bay's trash.

>>83036191
>emoji cinematic universe

File: 1488939038368.jpg (65KB, 487x501px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 487x501px

Feed and seed

>>83035524
Money laundering

>>83035524

>Why doesn't Sony just quit the movie industry?

Because the japs are cucks.

The jews running Sony Pictures are just using them to make their jewish producer/actor buddies rich.

>>83036191
>people will pay to see it just to see how bad it is
If enough people did that Fant4stic and Nine Lives would have made a profit.

File: 1494193747475.jpg (73KB, 1080x1349px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1080x1349px

>>83035524
>Especially considering everything else they do is doing well, their films are a waste of money in comparison

nigga what?sony is fucking dead.

iirc, only their banks or whatever they have in japland and playstation are profitable.and iirc, they are selling playstations on a loss and only the software is making them money.
their TVs are dead, XPERIA is bleeding them dry, VAIO got bankrupt, Walkman is irrelevant for 20 years.Ive heard their cameras are still good, but how much of a profit can that department bring even if so.Hell, they recenetly even sold their HQ building for the last 50+ years because they needed money...
If anything, the movie department is what they need, depsite producing only critical trash it makes money...Adam Sandler flicks that cost like 20 mills to make usually bring them back like 200-300 mills for example.
They have some other stuff like the music industry that still make them decent money, like owning all the rights of Michael Jackson for example and other artists

>>83038528
why is her midriff white?

>>83038801
It's called reflecting light anon

>>83038528
W H O
H
O

???

>>83036191
>This film will make a profit because people will pay to see it just to see how bad it is.

If that were true, Snakes on a Plane would've done better.

File: 1489052150061.jpg (2MB, 1995x4839px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1995x4839px

>>83038154
Sure they would.

>>83041402
>this list

we reddit now

>>83038154
The first one was... alright.

This was at the point where the Transformers still had some of their original personalities. They actually put time and effort into the different transformers (Seriously, look up how they researched where all the parts of a vehicle would go if they "transformed" because they are transforming, not morphing).

Such a fucking shame that they kept milking it and it got worse and worse. At this point, I am only going to watch it if it has Unicron in all his glory. Even then, I will be skeptical.

>>83042825
>now