>ITT: movies/tv shows /tv/ convinced you to watch but

ur rong tho

>>82987614
This.

>>82987389
what's so shit about autopsy of jane doe, anon?

File: olwen-05.jpg (353KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 667x1000px

I hope they make a sequel

>>82987614
>>82987631
>>82987665
the last 40 minutes of this movie were weak, predictable, and relatively uninteresting. The characters became cliched and boring, every single scare was easily anticipated before they happened and totally unremarkable (oh wow, you put your eye up to a hole to look into a creepy empty hallway, and then suddenly a scary face appeared? I'm shocked), and the leaps of logic/plot were totally uninteresting.

The movie fails to be anything more than mediocre, which I would be able to forgive (I've watched a lot of worse horror movies) if only it was actually scary (it isn't).

TL;DR - 5/10 for a good first act and good directing, but the movie falls flat by never being scary or having a compelling story. Not good enough to be enjoyable as a good horror movie, not bad enough to be fun to watch and laugh at.

>>82987804
>he still expects movies to scare him
plebiano totale detected

>>82987389
I watched this and I can't remember anything past the beginning.

do you think they ever fucked any of the corpses when they was alone with them??

>>82988602
Do you always ask rhetorical questions?

>>82988563
it was a witch and she was alive all along and she reanimated the other corpses and made other spoopy shit happen and everyone died

[your favourite movie]

>>82988602
you already know the answer