With "The Mummy" coming out next year and Universal

None of these are watchable today.

Wait. You've ranked Bride at the bottom?

>>82932960
>were getting an awful shitty mummy reboot that looks like a mix of mission impossible +capeshit quips instead of a gritty, haunting movie that takes place in egypt like the original mummy with brendan fraser

>>82932960
>Monster Cinematic Universe

Fuck off

>>82933041
literally took 40 minutes for shit to happen. Didn't get decent until the monster met the blind man. Bride had a good ending though, so maybe I'm a little harsh.

>>82932960
The original mummy is actually really good

File: IMG_8797.jpg (155KB, 726x388px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 726x388px

They did it before everyone else. Now they get accused of bandwagon.

>>82933180
Could you really call them a "cinematic universe?" I mean, they just tend to ignore the other films and just had a crossover. I mean, Wolfman literally died in his movie.

>>82932960
Frankenstein > The Mummy > Wolfman > Bride of Frankenstein > Invisible Man > Phantom of the Opera (Orig. Lon Chaney) > Creature of the Black Lagoon > >>>>> Dracula > Werewolf of London > shit > Phantom of the Opera (1943 color version) >>>> She-wolf of London

I know someone will give me shit about Dracula (just find it boring most of its running time, I prefer more sexier Dracula movies) and Claude Rains' Phantom remake (shit mask, plus I hate the technicolor look)

>>82932960
>>82933054

Who DOESN'T think this film will pull an Amazing Spiderman 2 and do so badly that the other films in the shared universe fail to take off and even get made??

I wouldn't mind another Wolfman though desu

File: the-old-dark-house-movie-poster-1932-1020143314.jpg (174KB, 580x863px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 580x863px

>>82932960

>>82934068
There was another wolfman, it was decent but got lambasted so badly that a reboot won't happen for another couple years, at least.

Yes, that statement is intended to sound disgusting.