Would you watch a movie about the adventures of Harriet Pottress

only the latter

And Enoby Dark'ness

>>82851519
>>>/t/umblr

Why did you feel the need to feminise the surnames?

Why the fuck would their surnames change?

>>82851519
Make it an anime with yuri undertones and then we'll talk

>>82851543
>>82851553
To assert that they aren't children of the original characters

>>82851519
Isn't that LWA

File: 1483418897402.jpg (548KB, 1616x2896px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1616x2896px

Yea I'm sure the antagonist in the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises being female would improve it. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: 1453381800923.png (69KB, 328x407px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 328x407px

>>82851541
This is picture relateds doing
They're always pushing this sort of trash

>>82851519
a better question is why am i not in it

>>82851519
I don't watch movies made for children because I am an adult.

File: IMG_4041.jpg (1MB, 1588x2862px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1588x2862px

>>82851519
I wouldn't watch it because it'd just be a rip off the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody. Just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!"

The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right.

File: 1488411413843.webm (3MB, 1200x671px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1200x671px

>>82851519
Are there any fanfics about Harry Potter female on female or female on male sexually tense bullying?

Asking for a friend

>>82851519
No, It has to be Male harry and female Malfoya.

They start out like kids and Malfoya becomes jealous and pissy cause Harry choose the stupid suckers instead of her. Things begin to escalate as the story progresses and the sexual tension between the two starts climbing to the fucking roof.

spoilers they end up fucking and siring children. Rons sister can go fuck herself.

>>82851683
>"No!"

Laugh every time

>>82851519
dont forget his bff ronnie weasly

>>82853293
i meant her

>>82851560
Holy fuck you're retarded.

>>82851963
now that i'd watch

>>82851602
Ta-da

>>82851633
Yet you're compelled to post in a thread regarding one for some insecurity reasons. Kek