>0 Oscars >0 Good soundtrack >0 memorable film >0

>>82837712
They are raking in the dough.

>>82837712
Their only job is to make money and its working.

>>82837712
and yet......here you are, making threads about them. Funny how that works, isn't it?

>>82837712
>0 good villains
Disagree, despite Baron Zemo in the comics being patrician, Movie Zemo is also acceptable

Also, good actors portrayed the villains and did their best in shit films, like Kurt Russel

>>82837712
Filmmaking isn't all about awards and accolades. Popcorn flicks like these are all about entertainment and box office revenue.

>>82839306
fuggg

>>82839340
Movie Zemo wasn't even a character. Let alone a good villain

Loki is the only good one
Maybe Ego but I didn't see that crap film. But it's Kurt Russell so it's probably at least decent

>>82839528
Loki isn't good, he's just present.

Mark Mothersbaugh is scoring Thor 3, should be good

File: 1492282010847.jpg (96KB, 750x663px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 750x663px

-Great tier (Snyder level)
Gotg2

-Very good tier
Gotg1, Ant-Man

-Good tier
The First Avenger, Iron Man, Doctor Strange, Avengers 2

-Ok tier
Iron Man 2, Avengers

-Bad tier
The Overrated Soldier, Civil Bore, Iron Man 3

>>82839577
Damn, i did not know that, but having not even seen the first two was stoked for it solely bc of the director. Wilderpeople and WWDITShadows looked amazing, he's a talented director.

>>82839612
>iron man 3 is bad

>>82839612

Switch Iron Man 3 and Doctor Strange then it's accurate.