Post films that are as depressing as pic related. Also Threads

Go watch wild strawberries if you want depressing. Threads is comfy as shit then it goes bleak then it goes dark.

>>82784050
>Also Threads thread haven't seen anyone talk about this on here
It's literally one of the most talked about movies here and universally loved, you're just under the influence of the Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon (basically cognitive bias making you think something you wouldn't notice in the past is all the more frequent once you know about it)

As for similar depressing films
>Fail-Safe
>The War Game

File: threads-mine.webm (3MB, 360x272px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 360x272px

How can one movie be so comfy

>>82784661
haha shut the fuck up science bitch

>>82784661
Threads is almost never talked about relative to the constantly swelling shit tide of superhero movies and other LCD types. Honestly puzzled by you (ostensibly) earnestly arguing otherwise.

>>82784907
Not him but there was a Threads thread just a little while ago and everybody had a good time.

>>82784050
>Also Threads thread haven't seen anyone talk about this on here
lurk more faggot

>>82784917
That doesn't make it "one of the most talked about movies here," my man.

>>82784948
It does when compare to 99% of all movies ever made which we never ever talk about.

File: 1445019887514.jpg (18KB, 264x379px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 264x379px

>>82784976
Airtight logic 2bh.

>>82784999
Checked. Anyway, was there something about the movie you actually wanted to talk about?

>>82785049
Nah, just procrastinating by nitpicking the most inconsequential shit. You?

have a bump for your non-marvel/dc/LCD tentpole thread

>>82784917
>there was a Threads thread just a little while ago and everybody had a good time

So they should have. For a clunky little film made for next to nothing it's a terrific achievement.

well it's not as good as Threads but The Day After from America has a lot going for it. from what I can ascertain it had a tremendous impact in its time too.

>>82784948
kill yourself newfag

>>82785148
It's "New-Fag", New-Fag. gb2/gaiaonline and stop being such a New-Fag.

>>82785148
So we're citing threads from 10 years ago to prove how talked-about this movie is? Can't be clinging to the past like that, anon. Unless you're already like 75, of course.

>>82785173
>like
whatever
just because you haven't seen a thread about in you're 2 weeks of browsing doesn't mean it never gets talked about, that's why they used to say lurk more faggot.

>>82785253
>that's why they used to say lurk more faggot.

It's news to me. I'm pretty sure they did it to try and look like one of the guys because when you're that self-conscious an anonymous imageboard doesn't help much.

>>82785253
I feel like you're strongly denying the factual relative lack of popularity for Threads on /tv/ nowadays due to some strange form of emotional investment. Or is it just the old "you faggots will argue about anything" rule? Either way, I really couldn't care less so think what you want, bud.

>>82785309
>I really couldn't care less so think what you want, bud.

That must be why you can't stop pissing and whining about it.

>>82785338
Define "pissing and whining." I'm honestly just avoiding finishing this paper; that includes browsing /tv/ and looking up webcam lesbo porn.

>>82784050
Kino threads are basically full of newfags and plebs. If you mention Kurosawa, Bergman, Tarkovsky, etc. you're a pleb watching babby's first cinèma.

The real patricians have seen all the kinos, and have moved on to try to critique capeshit in capeshit threads.

>>82785290
>It's news to me
because you're a newfag who should lurk more.

>>82785148
>>82785253
>>82785338
>>82785361
>killing the thread with overpowering autism
shame

>>82784948
http://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/image/u2qKb15l-jTIHMJ70bV1Pg/

These are just the Threads threads with that same exact picture size in the archive, you can look for the other yourself.
Also notice the post count in said threads

>>82785544
welcome to 4chan