Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: End-of-Watch.jpg (183KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
183KB, 1920x1080px
Why can't Hollywood emulate what gangsters actually act like? They were Cringe City anytime they were on screen.
Aside from the cringe tier gangster acting, and some of the c-movie tier digital effects, this was alright. Why not go the extra mile to make it a really great movie?
>>
File: 1466010879317.jpg (32KB, 480x487px) Image search:
[Google]
32KB, 480x487px
>>82782704
>why aren't movies like real life
>>
>>82782704
>Why can't Hollywood emulate what gangsters actually act like?
They did when they wore pinstripe suits and used tommy guns, not these wannabe cumstains covered in tattoos with their pants around their ankles.
Also isn't Ayer from the Streetz?
>>
File: 1451379492152.jpg (9KB, 252x250px) Image search:
[Google]
9KB, 252x250px
>>82782725
>Why should characters in a film be relateable?
>>82782741
Gang bangers was the better phrase, yes. It's 4 a.m., cut me some slack.
>>
>>82782725
>I hate realism and believable characters
>>
Roger Ebert gave it 4 out of 4
>>
>>82782704
It was hilarious. They were almost like a comic relief
>>
>>82783109
>rating out of 4 instead of 5
Good riddance
>>
File: 1492780126911.jpg (102KB, 612x612px) Image search:
[Google]
102KB, 612x612px
Are we excited for his End of Watch Shadowrun movie?
>>
>>82783109
Ebert gives out 4/4s like they're cheap cigars
>>
>>82783233
>Ebert gives out 4/4s like they're cheap cigars
I guess he didn't give away enough considering how he turned out
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4