>1.2b overall >700m foreign What seperates this from say

>>82781449
That's photoshopped right? Emma looks really fucking weird in that photo, something about that neck.

>yfw dan stevens is about 10x more attractive than her

File: furries unite.jpg (55KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 400x600px

>>82781715
Not photoshopped, and I think it quite fits with the theme of the movie.

Btw the beauty is the one on the right.

>>82781449
>>82781715
Why does Watson look so wrong in this movie? Not even really an 'off' thing, every picture and clip I've seen makes her look 4/10. Is it the dress?

>>82781449
Marketing.

Don't underestimate the power of the Disney brand attached to a princess movie, also don't make unnecessary sequels(see alice and huntsman)

>>82781803
I saw more marketing for GITS than for this movie.

>>82781822
Ahh yes your anecdotal evidence kills my point.

>>82781855
Was there a lot of marketing for this movie?
I didn't see an unusual amount, do you have anything to prove your claim?
Burden of proof nigga

>>82781792
The horns and shaggy mane dont really suit her imho senpai

Disney sexless stylistically-bankrupt commercial masterminds peddling to consumerist masses hooked with "muh nostalgia" and "muh emma", a sexless and childish """"actress"""" riding off the fame from her one and only success and turned out to be a spoiled pseudo-feminist brat with no real world-view or experience. Much like Plato's allegory of the cave, modern millenials and political talking heads disavow and despise anyone who has actually had exposure and experience in a world beyond their simple fabricated viewpoints. This movie is a perfect example of people with no actual sense of the world creating their idealized, toothless and ugly world to be consumed by fanboys (girls) whose fantasies still remain at a third-grade level.

>>82781884
>“Beauty and the Beast” cost more than $300 million to make and market
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/08/movies/beauty-and-the-beast-disneys-300-million-gamble.html?_r=1&referer=https://www.nytimes.com/section/movies

>>82781957
With a production budget of 160m that's in the middle of the road in terms of marketing.
You double the budget and get the overall cost, including marketing, distribution and production budget.
You'd know that if you weren't so new.

>>82782035
>You'd know that if you weren't so new.
>Literally can't figure out why a Disney movie was more successful then let's say Snow White and the Huntman.

>>82782097
>hurr marketing
>gets proven wrong
>urr it's disney it make money ok why don't you get it are you new?

Why is /tv/ always wrong when it comes to box office predictions

File: fddc.png (327KB, 302x411px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 302x411px

plebs

>>82781449
horny indian people and Emma's cute mug obv