>Diane Lane played Martha Kent in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, and she’ll be reprising the role in this November’s upcoming Justice League
>During a fan interview she was asked if she could give any spoiler for Justice League, and if the movie would be better than The Avengers, to which she replies:
>"No, and no. Short but honest - I hate to disappoint, but..."
AHAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAAHHAA
IT KEEPS HAPPENING AGAIN AND AGAIN
Warner Bros already released a statement that she didn't mean that and she just couldn't speak about the movie.
>>82699744
yeah yeah sure it is easy to damage control with a bat credit card.
She meant she couldn't talk about the movie. Keep spamming this shit though, that oscar is getting closer I'm feeling it
>>82699744
>Warner Bros already released a statement that she didn't mean that
>>82699779
>that oscar is getting closer I'm feeling it
>oscar
>with snyder
you should be happy if the movie will include less martha
>"Diane meant "sorry to disappoint" in reference to revealing anything concerning "Justice League" that is not already out in the public, and, was declining to comment on a film (Avengers) that she has not seen. She is thrilled to continue her role as Martha Kent, and appreciates your excitement for "Justice League". Thank you for giving us the opportunity to clarify this."
Nice try Marvel shills but she hasn't even seen your shitty movie
>the movie is still in post production
>marvelcucks think lane even knows how the movie will look like
That's a little sad, stick to Cyborg's CGI you can do better than this
>>82699709
>WW movie release in less than month
>suddenly a gazillion threads about how bad state of the DCEU
Really activates my almonds.
>>82699824
>that fucking damage control
holy kek
>>82699868
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>82699824
>she hasn't seen the avengers
Based
>it's real
fuck me they just can't catch a break can they
>>82699744
>Releasing a statement trying to backtrack from an blatant misquote
Please tell me WB isnt this dumb
>>82700331
>Please tell me WB isn't this dumb
Anon..
Shills are getting desperate now that Wonder Woman is looking to be a huge success
>>82699709
>As if she has any say in anybody's opinion of the movie
>>82699709
You know we are not asking for GoG2 level of kino just avengers 1, and they can't
>>82700463
It's tracking to be a moderate success on par with phase 1 Marvel movies and MoS.
Have DC fans never heard of "underpromise and overdeliver"? Why do you always do the opposite? You keep setting yourselves up for failure and ridicule.
>>82700463
>Wonder Woman is looking to be a huge success
>Tracking for $65 million opening
>On par with two Marvel flicks released in 2011
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>82700185
Why are they moving like that?
>>82700463
>now that Wonder Woman is looking to be a huge success
>>82700518
i think wondy just landed, so aquaman flinched, but cyborg is cgi so they didnt bother to render his animations reacting to her landing
>>82700185
Why is Aquaman stroking his trident like that?
>>82700498
gog2 sucked
>>82700570
>>82700510
Some people who've seen early screenings said the movie was amazing. I'm not worried this time.
>>82699709
Wait what? Hmmmmmm...
Diana LANE
Lois Lane!
Why is a LANE playing Martha Kent!!??
Hmmmm...
INCEST!???
>>82700698
And others said it was a mess. Your point?
>>82701041
That's hot!
>there are "people" on this board that imagine an attractive , intelligent, successful , middle aged woman saw avengers
Yeah . JL is going to suck but Diane Lane was saying "no" to discussing the film
>>82701077
>And others said it was a mess
You mean marvel shills?