>"Two infant twins are born. One of them will grow up to cure cancer, but only if the other one dies now. You don't have to kill the baby yourself but you do have to nod to make it happen."
Do you nod?
The answer doesn't matter.
What matters is that I remain cool when they tell me I failed it.
No, I think cancer should stay.
>>82693348
Yes.
easiest decision of my life
Nope.
Do we need to cure cancer? Sure it's sad and shit, but we all have to die sometime.
Maybe if shitskins stopped breeding so much we could all afford to live longer.
>>82693410
This. Its a shit card to draw but there cant be winners if there are no losers. Edginess aside, it would be fucked up to kill a child for any reason.
>>82693837
Maybe if you stopped being a fucking. Racist you would realize you and everyone is just trying to make it you piece of shit
>>82693348
Implications being that there won't be any cure for cancer for at least three more decades and no one can guarantee I or my loved ones wont develop cancer, I nod.
>>82693348
Don`t care one way or the other.
Can anyone ID Kevin's jacket?
>>82693348
If I don't have to see the baby at all, then easily yes. I could just spend the rest of my life rationalizing it as having never happened if theres no firsthand consequences
I dunno man, overpopulation is going to be out of hand before we realise, while cancer is terrible maybe it's what we're going to need
except some quick googling makes it look like cancer generally affect developed countries, which aren't exactly the biggest over-population perpetrators
fuck it, yeah, I'm a smoker, maybe he'll get a breakthrough in his 20s
>>82693348
Is the baby a nigger?
>implying cancer wasn't already cured decades ago
Can I kill both?