Should you be required to watch every one of these films

I can safely say I've only seen one of those

>>82537055
>watching movies made before 2000

lmao @ u famalam

>>82537055
KEK, ive only seen The Godfather and a few scenes from Apocalypse Now.

>>82537171
You watch movies, I watch films.

>>82537171
(you)
2/10 bait

>>82537055
I've only seen one of these, raging bull, and it was boring. Incredibly slow.

Old films don't age well because those audiences didn't have as much exposure to film and thus could only understand a much simpler presentation of a story than that seen in today's film.

But I'm sure it sates your ego having watched shit old films that nobody cares about. Congratulations on literally punishing yourself for a modicum of self worth.

>>82537171
this, nostalgiafags make me sick

File: film_major.jpg (31KB, 288x432px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 288x432px

>>82537386
>stories in film are more complex now than they were 50 years ago
it's almost too stupid to be trolling

File: 47342E4F-6A26-419B-B751-93CDA9A14D28-16314-00001094C4BC2B8D.png (28KB, 595x842px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 595x842px

>>82537603
Nice reading comprehension.

I said the presentation was simpler, not the story itself.

Here's a worksheet, you should practice.

>>82537730
So how is the presentation of the story in modern movies simpler than the presentation of the story in Vertigo or any film on that list?

>>82537730
>he doubled down on his b8
lol

File: Apocalypse_Now_poster.jpg (98KB, 301x450px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 301x450px

I just saw Apocalypse Now for the first time last week. Don't ask me why I just saw it, I don't really know.

Fantastic film, but I hated every single fucking character on the PBR except the chief (not chef). I know their characters were meant to represent different things, but their constant retardation and generally annoying behavior made me feel a sense of satisfaction when they got fragged.
>stupidly waste all the civilians on the boat
>act shocked when Willard caps the wounded woman

Rant aside, I think I waited so long to watch it because I was afraid it wouldn't live up to the hype. It actually surpassed the hype for me. Absolute kino.

>>82537055
I dont know how Tokyo Story isn't #1. There is literally no better film than Tokyo Story.

>>82537843
Haven't seen it and have already said I've only seen one film from the list. Please complete the worksheet, your ability to understand written English is abysmal.

>>82537055
>One UK film
>it's 2001

kys

>>82538158
because Hitchcock and Chaplin made their movies in USA

Murnau wasn't American either

>>82537603
Hes right though, because many of the film techniques and equipment weren't invented yet. Older movies used more simple means to present. However because it was a simple presentation they made bettee stories that took advantage of the weak means available to them. Hence why practical effects were mastered and new techniques were made nearly every movie.

Modern movies have everything to make a movie so they ride on how pretty they can wrap it up so many times the stories themselves fall flat.

Is this the official born in the wrong generation thread?

>>82537055
11/30
j u s t

>>82538158
Yes, this "country" is irrelevant.

>>82538281
False. I'm born in the right generation so I can pirate all these great movies.

>>82538323
18/30 get on my level

>>82537055
>Tarkovsky
I'll pass.

File: 1269201586081.jpg (119KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 640x480px

>mfw I've only seen five of these and am still considered the "film expert" among my friends

>>82538727
I haven't seen any of those films, and dont have any friends. Top that.

'no'

welles on citizen kane
>The shot of the loud, squawking bird was purposely placed by Orson Welles to make sure the audience was still awake.

hitchcock on vertigo
>Alfred Hitchcock called this an "icebox" scene, meaning it's the kind of scene that hits you after you've gone home and start pulling cold chicken out of the icebox. "Hey," says the hypothetical viewer. "How did Kim Novak vanish from the hotel? Did we ever find that out?"

>>82538957
desu I don't think you need to have watched anything ever

>>82537055
yes

Can somebody please explain "The Rules of the Game" to me. Why was that movie so controversial?

>>82537055
I've seen 15 of those. 2001 will eventually work its way to number 1. Just shows how great Kubrick was. It's the only Sci-fi on the list

File: ElectricBoogaloo.jpg (186KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1000x1500px

I remember when I was a College Freshman and took a Film History course as an elective. I was do deep and a film aficionado. I was so above it all.

What's college like these days OP? Do you have a Scarface poster or is that too "plebian"?

>>82538626
yeah, pass the dumb faggot test, dumb faggot

>>82539541
because it critiqued French society and was released during the buildup to WW2, basically it was called unpatriotic

>>82539761
>triggered pseudo-intellectual

>>82537055
Yes

>>82537386
>only seen one

Oh sweet so I can just throw your garbage opinion in the trash

>>82538281
No, cause we get all the great classics and great new movies.

>>82537055

12/30 with 8 more of those sitting around ready to watch.

Also Tokyo Story is the best film on there.

30/30

Get on my level fucking brainlets

>>82537055
No. This board is for shitposting about capeshit and Star Wars.

File: l'ascension du chevalier.jpg (439KB, 3414x1152px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 3414x1152px

>>82537055
That’s a wonderful list OP.
HOWEVER, most of those are entry level works. Posting in /tv/ requires a deeper sense of the arts which will take time to acquire.
I have compiled a list of great works of art in helping you obtain the level of patrician that /tv/ requires.
Enjoy.

FLICKS
1. Shining (Kubrick, 1980)
2. 一代宗師 / 一代宗师 (Kar-Wai, 2013)
3. L'inhumaine (L'herbier, 1924)
4. [달은 해가 꾼는 꿈] 예고편 (Park, 1992)
5. بادکنک سفيد (Panahi, 1995)

MOVIES
1. The Godfather, Part III (F. Coppola, 1990)
2. Á bout de souffle (Godard, 1960)
3. And a Little Kid Shall Lead Them (Griffith, 1909)
4. Kindsköpfe (Dugan, 2010)
5. Fear & Desire (Kubrick, 1953)

FILMS
1. Höstsonaten (Bergman, 1978)
2. Hets (Sjöberg, 1944)
3. The Birth of a Nation (Griffith, 1915)
4. 十二生肖 (Chan, 2012)
5. IIIIIIIIIIIIIII1891091718191611€€€€&-@ (Sandler, 2016)

CINÉMA
1. Mogambo (Ford, 1953)
2. Lost River (Gosling, 2014)
3. ¿Quién me quiere a mí? (Sáenz de Heredia/ Buñuel, 1936)
4. Eyes Wide Shut (Kubrick, 1999)
5. Der Student von Prag (Rye/ Wegener, 1913)

KINO
1. Berlin — Die Sinfonie der Großstadt (Ruttman, 1927)
2. Pauvre Pierrot (Reynaud, 1892)
3. Mauvais Garçons (1995, Bay)
4. Avatar (Cameron, 2009)
5. 劇場版ポケットモンスター ミュウツーの逆襲 (Yuyama, 1998)

ABSOLUTE KINOGRAPHY
1. Interstellar (Nolan, 2014)
2. L'ascension du chevalier noir (Nolan, 2012)
3. 01010101 01101110 00100000 01000011 01101000 01101001 01100101 01101110 00100000 01000001 01101110 01100100 01100001 01101100 01101111 01110101 (1928, Luis Buñuel)
4. 米姆魔术 – Bush 2016
5. The Revenant – Iñárritu, 2015

CAPEKINOGRPAHY
1. Watchmen (Snyder, 2007)
2. Man of Steel (Snyder, 2013)
3. 蝙蝠侠v正义的超人黎明 (Snyder, 2016)
4. Cпaйдъpмeн 2 (Raimi, 2004)
5. вoзвpaщaeт дeнщик (Burton, 1992)