>thor ragnarok trailer comes out >mods have to make a

Looks retarded.

>>82534760
How ?

>>82534662

Looks like shitty and unimaginative CGI.

>>82534830
Looks like fucking extras from prometheues

Let me guess:

That scene has Gostism walking through the place that's currently making replicants and explaining their history and how far they've come.

And other predictable things!

>>82535203
>every Civilization is built on REPLICANT slaves on the off world Colonies


Uh, I mean,
>all Civilization is built on expendable Labour LOL


Fucking Jared Leto is now 2049 Hitler. What garbage

>>82534662
>looks great
How the fuck does it look great? The stairs in the background look CGI. The mannequins in glass boxes are cheap and unimaginative.

>looks great
It looks as bad as robocop 4

>>82535154
That's a retarded observation

>>82534662
>at least visually looks great.
It looks like fucking garbage.
Like someone turned down all the graphical settings on a pc game.

>>82534662
Worst part about this shot is that I can completely see what they were going for with it and how they failed to film it properly.

>>82535518
And what was it? (seriously, I want to know)

>>82534662
>REMINDER
Disney shills are in this thread to actively shit on the trailer to stop it stealing some of that capeshit money

>>82534662
>filmed digitally
>looks great
pick one, reddit.

File: 1333651628640.jpg (6KB, 246x250px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 246x250px

I just watched this too and I spent the entire trailer repeating the words "This is reddit, this is imdb, this is reddit, this is imdb..." under my breath.

I fucking hated it. I was writhing around on the floor in front of my sofa for the last 30 seconds it was so painful.

>Ayy super clean reboot lmao
If you liked it you're in the wrong place

>>82535649
>being this autistic
lel

>>82534830

retarded

Blade runner shouldn't look that spic n span

>>82535569
>And what was it? (seriously, I want to know)
They were going for that pyramid aesthetic from the first blade runner but tired to go into a inca temple or ziggurat direction but fucked up the "awe" angle, so now it looks like a flat shot of two actors in front of a greenscreen superimposed onto a flat wallpaper.

>>82535821
show me one good digital film with great shots. If you send a pic of Mad Max Furiosa Road, Im gonna laugh.

>>82534662
>mods have to make a sticky warning
I somehow believe there is one mod on /tv/, and all he does like to watch is reruns of Seinfeld.

>>82535649
This

It lacks any visual depth or aura, just a glib facsimile of its predecessor.

>>82534662
i said it in the trailer video comments. I think this is going to be the movie Ghost in the Shell should of been.

>Ryan Gosling
>Harrison Ford
>Ama de Amas
>Jared Leto

no black people or asian people in the trailer. That's great. It's not stealing a property that SHOULD HAVE gone to asian actresses.

>>82535909
I hate digital but a Rfn and Fincher shoot digital and they have a lot of nice shots.

>>82535909
The Revenant
Now fuck you utter pleb

>>82535972
>The Revenant
HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

>>82535964
also fun fact i forgot to mention. i never seen the first blade runner and have no intention to cause it looks shit. But thislooks better

Also people are saying that The first blade runner has ties or at least informs things in the new Alien Covenant movie. IF anyone has seen both those movies lemme know if it's true

>5 second "trailer-for-the-trailer" clip at the beginning of the trailer
Why is this a common marketing trend now? This meme needs to die in hell.

>>82535972
that should have been shot on Super Panavision 70

>>82535993
Laughing at him doesn't make him less wrong, pleb.

>>82535844
Could you find the shot you mean? I haven't seen BR in years and I don't know what shot you mean. I agree with the "superimposed onto a flat wallpaper" look, looks bad.

>>82534662
Rubin Wright
Ana de Armas
Mackenzie Davis
god yes

>>82536031
No it shouldn't have

>>82535909
what is a digital film? like VOD?

>>82534662
>>mods have to make a sticky warning
they didn't had to, just probably there is a dccuck mod he implied there will be shilling

>>82536033
yes it does. Revenant had alot of shit done to it to give it that look.
Any film that requires colour correction should be ignored for cinematography.

>>82536062
No, it's any film made in the last 15 years not directed by Nolan, Tarantino or Paul Thomas Anderson
this joke is actually really clever

File: 03.jpg (63KB, 329x370px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 329x370px

>>82536062

neo-neo-neo-neo-neo-nu/tv/ everyone

>>82536106
>Any film that requires colour correction should be ignored for cinematography.
We get it, you're an idiot
Now fuck off already

>>82535765

Sounds like you spend more time thinking about Reddit than people who actually use reddit

>>82536157
do you have value in digital film? give an argument or fuck off yourself

>>82536106
Lead with an opinion and thought provoking questions next time instead of just shit posting. Help fix the fucking board.

>>82536179
argue against what? your personal unsubstantiated feelings?
How about that the Red helium 8k has more dynamic range than 35mm film, nevermind 16mm?
Or that 35mm film is estimated to have a resolution of roughly 6k, which has been easily surpassed on digital?
>b-but muh meme directors said....
yeah, form your own opinion you little shit

File: 1351264046245.gif (858KB, 240x228px) Image search: [Google]

858KB, 240x228px

looks like actionfied trash, classic modern hollywood

>>82536242
>form your own opinion
>heres technical data from camera manuals
lmao

>>82536029
It's for millennial retards with 5 second attention spans. It's basically letting them know that "ooooh, there's explosions and shit ahead" if they keep watching.

>>82535386
This man has gone too far

The movies climax will be that Deckard is a replicant, and this fact will in some way save Gosling (he uses his super strength or some shit)
I am right, this is what will happen, screencap it 2017

>>82535993
But you got BTFO

File: 1490145381968.png (204KB, 440x335px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 440x335px

>>82534662
is that screenshot supposed to look good?

>>82536301
>film is better in an unquantifiable way
>using actual stats is cheating
wow, nice reasoning fagtron

>>82536242
>the only thing that matters is resolution
Off yourself.

File: emma stone laughing.jpg (183KB, 920x1227px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 920x1227px

>>82536879
>he thinks dynamic range is the same thing as resolution
why do i bother responding to literal retards?

>>82535964
>>82536024
>it's an "anon hasn't seen the original Blade Runner 'cause it looks shit' but is excited for Blade Runner 2049 because it has Jared fucking Leto of all people" episode
Jesus.

>>82536242
Maybe the fact that it's all a slight notch ''better'' makes digital looks worse compared to 35mm. You ever think of that?

>>82536301
>>82536879
Film gave the original Blade Runner that good cyberpunk feel purely due to the impurities of film, they could easily recreate it with digital, but they haven't, so bravo Villenvue you fucking hack

>>82536926
That's not what I said though.
But I'm really glad to know you don't have a real argument.

File: 1493839487812.jpg (12KB, 460x345px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 460x345px

>>82534662
No Disney, No Bisness

>>82536984
stop posting

>>82537051
Make me.

>>82534662

Awesome another soft reboot pretending to be a sequel! I wonder if Harrison Ford will die in this one?

Jokes - of course he will!

>>82536984
>That's not what I said though.
Right here >>82536879 that's exactly what you said
Nice attempt at backtracking faggot

>>82537107
I can't make you do anything, I can only try to appeal to your reasonable side and say that noone agrees with you and you're making a fool of yourself, it's an anonymous imageboard so noone will really know or care if you don't, but it will save some of us the headache of reading your exceptionally unironically retarded posts.

>>82537148
What part of that post implies I think dynamic range and resolution are the same thing?

>>82537183
I wonder who's more retarded.
The retard or the guy who's constantly replying to the retard.
I'm just having a bit of fun with your autistic ass' expense

>>82536258
>classic modern hollywood
what did he mean by this?

>>82537186
the bit where you claimed that i said the only thing that matters is resolution
>being too retarded to follow his own dialogue
I get it, you're an underage pleb. I don't know what you expect to prove by consistently embarrassing yourself

>>82534662
How did they manage to turn Blade Runner into capeshit?

>>82537318
>you're an underage pleb
He said while insisting that digital is objectively superior to film.

>>82535765
For someone who hates reddit, you sure are an expert on what reddit's style is...

>>82534662
It does look great, and I expected it to be shit

File: n8umjWj.png (3KB, 698x1284px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 698x1284px

>>82537264
wew lad, what an epic troll, it almost looked completely and undeniably like you were retarded and invested in trying to be right, then switched at the end because you finally realised how dumb you were
but now you've told us you're just a super rusemaster the egg is on our face

File: 1470295584954.jpg (35KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 320x320px

>>82535993
u got rekt tbqh

How come trailers now have mini-trailers preceding them showing exact scenes that you're going to see in the regular trailer?

>>82537135
idk, the visuals/soundtrack seem almost on point for someone with hardon for industrial noir.

Looks like they shit on that classic P.Dick comfy narrative though.

>HURR HURR, you're so special
>War
>Division
>Philosophy for 8th graders

>>82537374
Actually my argument has only been a refutation that digital can't look good - using objective metrics to show that on paper it's superior
I never said it was objectively superior as a medium, nice projecting dickad

File: 1493260068055.png (390KB, 548x400px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 548x400px

>>82534662
I'm really excited for it, it's definitely the movie I'm most looking forward to this year. I think the Goose is going to carry the movie pretty hard though. Ford looks like shit. Reminds me of Bill Murray in the new Ghostbusters. I also got bad signs from that girl with the black hair who seems like a villain. She just looks like a bad actor to me. But the visuals look very clean and they have that sterile feel to them, and the music seems good-- gives me Ex Machina vibes. Overall I'm optimistic

>/tv/ wants me to believe that Baby Grewt is cool but Deakins and Lubezki are hacks

Please /pol/ just invade us for real, I'd rather have you than these plebes

>>82534662
The visuals look like something I haven't seen before, that's a new one in the last few years. But yeah, that's all it has going for it so far.

>>82534662
It doesn't show enough to form an opinion on the movie. The aesthetics are interesting to say the least but they feel disconnected from the original movie. I can respect not going for a full remake a la Star Wars though

>>82537436
I'm not the anon you were arguing initially with.
Though I doubt you'll believe me.
It's always funny to make autistics spazz out.

>>82537547
>>/tv/ wants me to believe that Baby Grewt is cool but Deakins and Lubezki are hacks
Where does it say this? Could you post examples? I get that you need to defend being a tasteless entry level imdb drone, but post some source

>>82536546
It's because YouTube ads are skippable after 5 seconds, tardcake.

>>82537630
>merely pretending this hard
"I...it wasn't me!"
Next up is the poorly photoshopped screenshot, no?

>>82537635
>tasteless entry level imdb drone
Don't you get tired of embarrassing yourself?

>>82537264
>i-i'm not mad! i'm j-J-just having fun! i'm laughing! HAaha!!

>>82536029
to catch attention in 5 second scipable ads on youtube

Why does the set look wooden?

>>82537688
Imagine being THIS autistic.
Just fucking imagine.

Jay Bauman here, this movies looks retarded and cashbrabby as fuck, don't waste your time or your money. we won't a review and will watch something more worthwhile instead

>>82534662
It looks like something a child would make if they were trying to be artistic.

>>82537777
i don't have to, with posts like yours

>>82537686
The hotpocket sensibilities pervade through every frame of his work, and it is most definitely a tasteless entry level imdb drone pandering.

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-08 at 1.44.12 PM.png (255KB, 858x353px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 858x353px

>>82536943
im excited for Ryan Gosling. but Jared actually does look good

File: Guardians-of-the-Galaxy-Vol-2-Super-Bowl-spot-02.jpg (196KB, 1920x796px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 1920x796px

>>82537547
Can you explain how OP's plywood set with mannequins looks better than this?

>>82537635
>Where does it say this? Could you post examples?
Sorry I kept you waiting, I knew some shill would post eventually >>82537830

>>82534662

looks like a map from Unreal Tournament.

I bet that hallway leads to the blue flag.

>>82537793
I wonder if your autistic mind forces you to reply to this post.

>>82537874
Did you post that as damage control now that everyone knows how much of a tasteless entry level imdb drone you are?

>>82537830
easy, Marvel embraces the comic book aesthetic and executes it perfectly. this shit is trying to be a sci-fi blockbuster and a "real film" at the same time, failing at both

>>82537968
No, here you have the same shill replying to himself>>82537977

>>82538026
>everyone else is a samefag but me!
Stop replying to yourself anon.

>>82534662
>It's popularity determines whether I like it
I know just the place for you so the upvote groupthink mentality can tell you what to like

t.tourist

>>82538026
So you're saying that after you got called out for having no taste whatsoever, someone decided to actually post it and it's just merely a coincidence?

>>82538072
I really don't think there two different people believing that GotG2 videogame tier visuals are better than Deakins in this trailer

>>82534662
Ryan Gosling ruins it. Same hair, same facial expressions same attitude every fucking movie.
Fuck could have been a good movie.

File: Screenshot_20170508-171515.png (152KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 720x1280px

>>82538026
Stop being a retard. Whoever called OP'em pic an unfinished Quake map was dead on.

>>82538115
Guardians of the Galaxy 2 unironically looks better than what I've seen of Blade Runner 2049.
>I really don't think there two different people believing that Inception Miley Cyrus tier score is better than Williams in The Force Awakens
Is basically your argument.

>>82538106
Well you didn't call anything out you just said "imdb drone" a few times like it meant something while everyone else laughed at you. But also yes, that shill wasn't me, people like that post here everyday

File: iris van herpen biopiracy.jpg (483KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 1920x1080px

pfft these hollywood boys are stealing ideas from my fashion mommy iris van herpen

>>82534662
>The key to-The future...
I fucking hate chopped up trailer dialogue.

>>82538169
>Guardians of the Galaxy 2 unironically looks better than what I've seen of Blade Runner 2049
sad but true

>>82534662
How about you stop buying into hype and talk about a movie after it's actually out?

>>82538188
So let me guess this right
>you got called out and then had to do damage control cover up
>you don't speak /tv/ language
>you're a tasteless entry level imdb drone
What time is it currently where you live?

>>82538211
I thought his voice just cracked

>>82538169
>Guardians of the Galaxy 2 unironically looks better than what I've seen of Blade Runner 2049.
Until I see Peckard becoming a giant pac man and a dancing baby tree over a Fallout New Vegas tier CGI background, I'd say no

>>82538201
but that been a japanese fetish for at least a decade

>>82538249
>>you got called out and then had to do damage control cover up
>>you don't speak /tv/ language
>>you're a tasteless entry level imdb drone
Literally all wrong

>>82538286
eh maybe youre right im not very into japanese fetishes to know about that

Am I the only one that can't stand Jared Leto? He just seems like such a smug pseudo-intellectual prick and I cannot separate that from his acting.

>>82538264
Neither of those have anything to do with the visuals of a movie, you retarded monkey.

File: roy_batty_by_cyberaeon-d8zv6aq[1].jpg (648KB, 1242x608px) Image search: [Google]

648KB, 1242x608px

>snow level
>desert level
>things happen

this isnt blade runner

>>82538326
You're not alone, anon.

>>82538306
>you got called out
>>82537635
>then had to do damage control cover up
>>82537830
>>82537874
>you don't speak /tv/ language
>>82538188
>you're a tasteless entry level imdb drone
>>82537635

Don't step up to locals when you're a disgusting capeshit tourist from /vg/

>>82538340
>Fallout New Vegas tier CGI background
Learn to read

File: dieslit.webm (2MB, 640x352px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x352px

>>82538318

>>82538381
Half of those are mine and the other half aren't. Guess which is which

>>82538382
>Fallout New Vegas tier CGI background
Implies the CGI was poor.
Which has nothing to do with the visual design of the scene.
And I honestly doubt you've seen the movie or played FNV if you think the CGI is New Vegas tier in the scene.

File: Drive.jpg (89KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1280x720px

So is Drive a replicant like Han Solo?

>>82538441
Now you're playing dumb to save face? This is actually fucking hilarious
Answer the question, /vg/
>What time is it currently where you live?

File: 600px-CollateralUSP-45-5-1.jpg (35KB, 600x250px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x250px

>>82535909

>>82538446
>Implies the CGI was poor.
Damn right, since the entire visuals of GotG were CGI and it was poor, it has poor visuals

File: 1494017752940.gif (704KB, 382x450px) Image search: [Google]

704KB, 382x450px

>>82538264
>have a futuristic setting
>one decides to have fun and explote the audiovisual possibilities
>the other has autists staring at eachother talking about phylosophy or some shit, something you could do in a regular drama, wasting sets, costumes, sfx, budget, etc

>>82538381
>being proud to be a "local" on a board that is the toilet of /pol/

Neck yourself, fag

>>82538468
Do you realize that besides entertaining your autistic ass I'm actually arguing with actual capeshitters like this fellow >>82538508 >>82538446 right?

>>82538496
>it was poor
Not really.
It wasn't anything spectacular, but the CGI wasn't poor.
CGI quality STILL has nothing to do with the visual design of a movie.

>>82534662
Looks like Deus Ex Human Revolution: The Movie

>>82538554
You're extremely transparent across the board
Answer the question

>>82538554
>capeshitters
I >(>>82538446) don't particularly like capeshit though.
Still doesn't mean I think Blade Runner 2049 looks better than Guardians of the Galaxy 2 JUST because it has Deakins working on it so it HAS to be good.
The film looks like generic garbage, deal with it.

Looks cheap

>>82538625
It looks better because it has a richer color palette, a better perspective and sense of depth, infinitely better composition in literally every shot of the trailer and things like that.

Deakins is great like that

>>82538606
>Answer the question
Ok, yes

>Its raining.
>Pop on Vangelis CD, "Love theme from Bladerunner"
>WAH-WAH-WAH WA-WA-WA-WA-WA-WAA
>Hold tumbler of whisky, look out of the window in a moody way.

I can't be alone in this.

>>82534662
WB is such a fucking embarrassment

>>82538769
>Be in the mood to watch Blade Runner
>Turn out all the lights in my bathroom, turn on neon signs
>Put laptop on stool across room
>Sit in my cold running shower watching it while eating ramen and chainsmoking

I can't be alone in this

>>82538718
>Ok, yes
Thanks. I'll make sure to let the taste makers know that the liberal from /vg/ is still here posting his anti art ideals

>>82538864
Do you at least have a hooker beating you up while you're watching the film?
If not, get the fuck out of my /tv/, you Blade Runner-hating retarded philistine monkey.

File: 1494235197049.jpg (6KB, 329x237px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 329x237px

>>82538952
>if a silly robot movie is slow and moody it becomes "art"
dumb trump supporter

>>82539057
anything can be art if you're pretentious enough anon

>>82538952
Are you the cringelord the scripts foretold?

Different audiences. The capeshit audience will eat up any diarrhea shit.

>>82539057
It doesn't say that, anti art scum
It says you're the pusher of anti art ideals. And now a game of thrones image? All the memes are there

>>82538605
Deus Ex Human Revolution looked like Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence looked like the first Blade Runner.

It's shit already. Ridley Hack Scott never made anything in his miserable, useless life. Sad!