Is this the ultimate /pol/ wet dream as a TV series? >Everyone

It's a really good show
shame it will be impossible to talk about here without being memed

>>82497527
God I hated that book. Had to read it in high school. Most unrealistic dystopia ever.

File: 99984871287.jpg (83KB, 600x360px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 600x360px

>>82497576
It was based off the Iranian Revolution and Afghanistan.

Pic related is Iran in the 70's.

File: 3333334444.png (2MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1680x1050px

Best scene so far.

File: muslims-sharia law, londinistan.jpg (79KB, 750x600px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 750x600px

>>82497527
>/pol/ wet dream

No. It's the west's reality under muslim sharia law.

>>82497527
wow sounds just like Sharia
really got my turbina spinning to be quite frank

>>82497675
link to scene?

>>82497697
Come on, it's ok if white "DEUS VULT" christians are doing this, and not some brown muzzies that came here.

Forgot to mention, all infidels got killed or deported, of course.

>>82497675
What about this scene do you like?

>>82497804
She's getting hanged, look at that, it's so neat

>>82497796
Delusions are a sign of mental illness. Seek help.

>>82497667
the point is that it could only happen in the past, the 80s when Christianity was at a high point in America. It's the most unrealistic dystopia because it's becoming highly unlikely to happen in an increasingly secularists world.
I also hate the book for a specific passage where offered and a friend of hers pass by some guards, she has a mental monologue where she notes that she shakes her hips as she walks in order to tease one of the guards, how she relishes the knowledge that she has some small amount of power and how he won't be able to "relive stress" because she belongs to another man or with another man. God that passage made my blood boil because it reminds me how rotten women really are

>>82497796
>strawmanning someone that doesn't exist

kek

>>82497804
Your lover gets hanged in front of you, while they drive you away to get killed by your "friends" on some crazy ritual. Drama.
Better than those annoying flashbacks or scenes where she gets fucked by her master while his wife watches.

File: Nigéria then and now.jpg (381KB, 1414x610px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 1414x610px

>>82497527
so only the chosen leaders have access to fertile bitches to breed with.
does this mean they are gonna send their own kids to be the menial labour for the next generations?
who's gonna do the mandatory production in mines, factories, farms and waste processing plants to maintain the society 10-20 years later?
is the feminazi jew actually fucking retarded?

>>82497851
Oh really? After browsing pol for 4 years I am delusional?

>>82497769
seconded

>>82497967
>browsing pol for 4 years I am delusional?
what the fuck did you expect? a degree of frogposting?

>>82497796
You are insane.

File: 7drHiqrh.jpg (19KB, 312x213px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 312x213px

>>82498042
Frogs are for noobs.

>>82498013
>>82497769
http://ex-fs.net/series/72406-rasskaz-sluzhanki.html
I doubt you know Russian, but here it is. Third episode.

Its mysoginy porn. I dont get why people like it

>>82497854
I think the point is more to describe a potent ideological force, and how many people do not need to genuinely buy into it for a massive restructuring of society to take place.

The fact that it is religious in the novel is incidental and non-necessary. To relate that the events in the novel could only occur in the past is true, but only in the context of American cultural-Christianity.
This is not to say it couldn't happen in different places, or in a way that bears a family resemblance. This is the larger point.

File: TD.jpg (156KB, 428x720px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 428x720px

day of rope soon friends

>>82498123
just make a webm and post it on /gif/

It seems to me much more like a feminists wet dream story to which they can go "SEEEE! THIS IS WHERE WERE HEADING!" Even in the promo shit they worked this angle.

>>82497667
There is NOTHING that pisses me off more than seeing pictures of Iran before the fucking mudshits took over. If there was one point in time where the west should have chosen a side it was then and there, and quash islam out for good.

>>82497854
>this work of FICTION written many years ago is unlikely to happen in our present day or near future
>that means the book is bad!

You realize how absurd you sound, right? If you don't like the book that's fine, but don't be retarded about it.

>this horribly oppressed, powerless women relishes the small modicum of power she has
>women are rotten whores!

Come on now.

>>82498498
Both 1984 and Brave new World were written decades ago, and their vision of a terrible society rings even more true now.
Also, she had no reason to do what she did, she gains nothing but stroking her ego

>>82498566
Being prophetic has nothing to do with the quality of the story. If you hold those two in higher esteem because they "predicted future better" that's your right. The point of The Handmaid's Tale wasn't to make an accurate dystopia based on our present climate. There is no post not in explaining this to you because you obviously don't care.

Also, don't let your /r9k/ browsing hamper your ability to understand her feelings in this scene. After everything she's been through you begrudge her the little rush she gets? Really? I hate using this word, but you really do sound like a misogynist.

>>82498891
*point in explaining this

it's like totally timely because trump will make women into birth cows

>>82497854
>God that passage made my blood boil because it reminds me how rotten women really are
So in a book where women are treated as commodities and rape is sanctioned by the government, one woman teasing a man means that all women are rotten?

>>82499052
There's no trying to save him. People like this are lost and will never know love.

but seriously women are trash

>>82498891
I do hold onto them in higher esteem because they predicted the future better because they are more grounded in reality. The Handmaiden's Tale is pure fantasy by comparison, and everyone can write fiction but not everything can predict the future so accurately. It shows that Huxley and Orwell were better writers.

>After everything she's been through you begrudge her the little rush she gets? Really?
Would you say the same thing if it was a man strangling a cat to death after having lived a life of parental abuse? I don't complain about characters doing evil things, I've watched/read stories of people doing far, far worse things. The difference is that the writer never attempted to pass them off as sympathetic

>>82498891
>Being prophetic has nothing to do with the quality of the story.

And the quality of Handmaid's Tale is complete trash

>>82499122
The only woman who will ever genuinely love you is your mother. Some people don't even get that. Some women don't give a fuck about their own offspring

>>82499122
>save him

lmao fucking libshits and your savior complex

>>82499173
>I do hold onto them in higher esteem because they predicted the future better because they are more grounded in reality.
It wasn't never intended to predict the future, so that's a silly argument.

>Would you say the same thing if it was a man strangling a cat to death after having lived a life of parental abuse?
Are you seriously comparing senselessly killing an animal to a woman swaying her hips?

>>82497967
When you spend that much time in an echo chamber, probably.

>>82499173
Like I said, no point in explaining.

Also,
>strangling cats equated to a little tease
>implying it was an act of evil
Just stop.

>>82499358
Brave New World was intended to predict the future. It also predicted fetal alcohol syndrome years before doctors discovered it.
>>82499374
okay maybe the cat killing was a bit extreme. the point is Atwood was trying to make offered sympathetic and this falls flat when she commits such a petty and mean-spirited act.

>>82499348
>>82499316
>this bitter vitriol spewing from virgin mouths

I'm not a liberal or anything like that I just know people who blame women for all the evils in the world and for all of their problems. They are the most miserable people. No one enjoys being around them. And nothing I've done to try to help them (because they were my friends) worked. It sucks losing someone you love to cynicism and loathing

>>82499556
>I'm not a liberal or anything

Lmao shut the fuck up

File: 1485544083234.jpg (107KB, 770x667px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 770x667px

>>82499556
>I'm not a liberal or anything like that

>>82499556
hey buddy I wrote that post and have friends. I don't blame women for all my problems, kikes and niggers are the ones to blame for that. I'm pointing out that I hate that specific book because they made me read it in high school and how badly written it is.

>>82499640
Anti-SJW's are just as obnoxious though

>>82499549
So this one little thing makes Offered unsympathetic? Weighed against her being a slave and rape-doll THIS tips the scales in favor of her being unsympathetic? Because she needed to feel some form of control in a life that she can't really say belongs to her?

>>82499556
>using the virgin argument
want to know how I know you're a woman?

The novel was based on Iranian's Islamic republic rise which make the Sha left the country.

Funny how is now relevant because of durmpdrodf

>>82499591
>>82499640
I voted for Trump. I also believe women are not the root of all evil. Is that so hard to understand?

>>82499659
My apologies. I can't fault you for not liking the book. I get it.

>>82499678
Yes because she's no better than her oppressors. She toys a with a man's life just like they toy her life. There's a million ways to make yourself feel like you have some control over your life that doesn't come at the expense of someone else

>>82499790
Your bait is stale.

test

>>82499173
>The Handmaiden's Tale is pure fantasy by comparison, and everyone can write fiction but not everything can predict the future so accurately. It shows that Huxley and Orwell were better writers.

This is the funniest thing I've read in quite a while. I mean you can argue which of the books is the best but the fact that you think the highest standard of fiction is its ability to predict the future is absolutely hysterical.

Have you ever even read any other books that any of those authors wrote?

>>82498566
>Both 1984 and Brave new World were written decades ago, and their vision of a terrible society rings even more true now.
Neither of those were "visions". They used antiutopic societies to raise the question of relations between the Individual and the Power. Orwell wasn't an idiot, and did not pursue the goal of "warning the world of horrors of X" - he used the book to describe how a ruling elite of a totalitarian society positions itself in relation towards individual citizens and their rights, and how it employs it's power upon them to further their own goals - the quintessential parts of the book being the Forbidden Book and O'Brien's monologue during Winston's interrogation. Huxley was describing the process of individual's domestication or rejection in a consumerist society.

Neither of them were retarded enough to see their works as actual predictions.

>>82497854
>the point is that it could only happen in the past
It cannot happen now because US is a filthily wealthy nation ATM. The world in the book went through a massive shakedown, with standards of life plummeting like hell, which causes an uprise of religions 10 times outta 10, see Middle Eastern regimes, or USSR going down, with most of it's former countries going from the most secular society in human history to average European levels of Christian in a matter of 20 years.

Once again - the book is not a prediction (and I think it's rather meh overall), it's just that your opinion of "we're ultra-secular now and forever" is hilariously dumb.

>>82500100
Yeah bro. I read Braver New World and 1985! Lmoa!

>>82500111

This is a very clear, rational post. I'm not sure why you think it has any place in a thread with people who likely read less than 2 books a year.

>>82497955
>they are gonna send their own kids to be the menial labour
Yes. What's with it? In slavery economics of Classical era like Greek city-states and Rome many wealthy people and even members of higher society, like patricians, had children with their slaves, later usually paying no regard towards them - examples of them freeing their own slave children and their mothers happened, but very rexceptionally. For most of them those children were not people - there were accidental byproducts of careless use of their property.

>>82500111
That's too thought out. Post Bane.

>>82500100
I explained in a few posts earlier that it's because they are grounded in reality that they could predict the future. Bet you like to read YA fiction because it's quality is on par with the handmaiden's tale

>>82500244

It's truly a treat to witness such hilarious stupidity.

>>82500217
oh okay.
but in this show it seems more like they want to have heirs from these breedind sows.

>>82497854
was it autism?

>>82500244
>the closer to nonfiction a fictional work is, the better!
>i won't stand for works of fiction that I can't perceive of happening in my reality!
>i didn't like The Lord of the Rings because elves doesn't real! this is my core argument against it!

You are a stubborn toddler.

>>82500217
Hell, you even see this happening in more modern societies. All the slaveowners in the USA, Cuba, and Brazil in the 1700s who had kids with their slaves and didn't seem to care about them. Or in Victorian Britain, the nobles who had kids with their servant girls.

And although it's less popular now, you still this mentality among the rich. Diego Maradona has like 8 or 9 kids, and he's publicly said "I have two legitimate kids, the rest are mistakes".

>>82500388
>toddler
ironic that the toddler who likes to read fantasy drivel instead of anything practical or anything that makes him think calls others toddlers
>>82500296
>no argument
>hahah you're stupid

>>82497854
is this the greatest bait in the most unexpected of threads? or is it the purest fom of autism in just this thread?

>>82500497
See Poe's law.

>>82500463
Come on. Your earlier posts were much more potent. This bait is still flaccid.

>>82497854
>the point is that it could only happen in the past
god you are naive

>>82500244
>they could predict the future
>cult of Our Father Henry Ford
>mass-produced people actually being gimped from birth to lock them into different castes
>almost entire world being divided between 3 nations carrying out fake warfare against each other to fuck with their citizens
>PREDICT
>THE
>FUTURE

I'm not sure what is more likely - that you did not read the books in question, or that you understood so little of them.

Reminder that Christian fundamentalists and paleoconservatives have no purchase on America, politically, culturally, or socially.

The idea that america is under some kind of existential threat from a cabal of puritanical, far right christian conservatives is a concoction of the (((political left))) to draw away attention from their own dirty deeds.
>"Hey guys, stop paying attention to us. Focus your hate and resentment on these imaginary strawmen we created."

The irony of course is that white conservative christians would be totally justified if they decided to revolt and kill as many lefties as they could. You just need to take a quick look at Hollywood and NYC to see which side of political spectrum needs to be taken down a notch.

>>82497527
>>Everyone is super religious
>>women are treated as walking incubators, wear traditional clothing, not allowed to own anything and work
>>Homos get hanged on the streets as "gender traitors"

This is already happening. It's called Islam.

>>82497527
So what it is?
Some historical epic about the Middle East?

>>82500599
It's feminist fan-fic masquerading as literature and now a tv series.

Women have the most privileges and are a protected class in the united states but that doesn't jive with the feminist narrative so they invent things to get upset about

File: 1399226691991.png (280KB, 450x375px)

280KB, 450x375px

>>82500582
>idea that america is under some kind of existential threat from a cabal of puritanical, far right christian conservatives
>implying that this is what the book is about

>>82500563
>cult of Our father Henry Ford
celebrity worship. The point was that people revere people who they shouldn't be.
>mass-produced people actually being gimped from birth to lock them into different castes
just see how people from third world countries are gimped and destined to being poor while people in 1rst world countries have much better chances and better lives overall

>almost entire world being divided between 3 nations carrying out fake warfare against each other to fuck with their citizens
it's extremely likely that there is a cabal composed of world elites that are all in league with each other and don't make a single unified country because they need to redirect the animosity of the masses towards others and not themselves

>>82500639
sounds about right

>>82500244
>the future

Are you fucking retarded? Brave New World was about a decadent society with mass production, constant references to Henry Ford, and widespread support for eugenics. What part of that is a prediction of the future? It was basically a darker, slightly more advanced 1920s.

>>82500726
You're right it's more like the present

>>82500726
inb4 somebody posts that comic

>>82500674
>a cabal of puritanical, far right christian conservatives

but that is literally what it is about

File: tmp_14759-kUzIiUQ_d-1692979309.jpg (92KB, 640x637px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 640x637px

Wait you mean in this world we can actually get laid? Count me in

>>82500696
>it's extremely likely that there is a cabal composed of world elites that are all in league with each other and don't make a single unified country because they need to redirect the animosity of the masses towards others and not themselves


t. Alex Jones

>>82500781
No. Only powerful, important men are allowed to have a woman.

>>82500793
pls buy my water filters

>>82500805
Which ironically is how hyper-religious societies traditionally end up working out. Like old Islamic caliphates, the caliph and his pals would have dozens of wives each and the grunts at the bottom would get fuck all.

File: e8PVDDw-e1432322423266.jpg (56KB, 550x413px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 550x413px

You all want a really prophetic book? Read The Machine Stops. It's freely available online and short. And it was written over a century ago.

>>82500758
There's widespread support for eugenics in the present? It seems every time it gets brought up people just mention Hitler and that shuts the whole conversation down.

>>82500596
Oh snap! OP BTFO

>>82500596
Regimes of Middle East were the major inspiration.

>>82500639
>in the united states
Author is Canadian.
>"oh well in Canada it's even more~"
The point here is that that piece of media is not intended as a warning or a propaganda piece with some specific country's population as target in mind. It's a study on the topic of segregation and oppression based on reproductive merit.

>>82500696
>celebrity worship
Okay, got me there.

>just see how people from third world countries are gimped and destined to being poor while people in 1rst world countries have much better chances and better lives overall
It's not a proper analogy on the caste society of BNV - it's the book's "savages" who are = third world.

>it's extremely likely
No.

>>82497565
Then talk about it, dumbass.

>>82500886
many supporters of the "alt-right" support eugenics.

>>82500596
ummm excuse you hun but mohammad was a feminist

>>82500805
Not exactly. There are regular men who have assigned all-purpose women to them, but only high-ranking government officials enjoy the harem situation we see in the show.

>>82500958
I know, I was mostly joking. But not all men are allowed a woman - specifically many of the Guardians aren't.

>>82500904
The alpha/beta duality. Also, the cabal is pretty much confirmed. It'd be weirder if the world wasn't being controlled by a small group of people

>>82497527
>can't get a woman because I'm a regular guy
>can't be gay because it will get me hanged
>can't jerk off because it's a sin

So what the fuck do men do in this universe?

>>82501059
Become a soldier so either they can either die quicker or rise through the ranks and get a waifu.

>>82501059
The same thing do men do in ISIS territory.

HOLY SHIT THIS SHOW IS LITERALLY TRUMP'S AMERICA, HE HATES WOMEN AND BROWN PEOPLE, ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE BAD!!!!

>>82501114
OMG LITERALLY THIS WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!

File: worry face.jpg (21KB, 389x440px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 389x440px

>>82501039
>mfw in the books it's made clear this was just the first wave of the government that was later purged by even more hardcore elements before Republic of Gilead collapsed AND future historians are wondering if protagonist's found tapes aren't just fiction because it couldn't have possibly been that bad

Fucking hell.

>>82500886
That's because in mainstream western society, eugenics isn't popular.

>>82500886
Eugenics are always a touchy subject. People tend to conveniently forget US had a strong undercurrent of supporting eugenics until WW2 and Hitler shat the bad.

>>82500780
No.

You lack reading comprehension. Or did not read the book at all.

And I don't even like the book! I think Atwood is talentless cunt. It's just mind-boggling how you manage to reinterpret her mediocrity into something completely different.

>"b-but it has American white Christian males as the main antagonizing force!"
If I happened to be similarly butt-bothered and insulted every time Russians are the unabsolvable villains in Western media then you go around picking the torn pieces of my devastated asshole across all the boards.

>>82501059
Look at Islamic countries and you'll find an answer.

>>82501059
>Can't explode in the shower
>Explode in some public marketplace instead

Is it true that it accurately depicts Trump's America? I live in the 1700s and am using a time-traveling device to send messages to the future.

>>82501202
is gilead not "a cabal of puritanical, far right christian conservatives?"

do you know what the word "literally" means?

>>82501142
Lol, it reminds me of how some people today are skeptical about some of the more brutal accounts of medieval warfare.

>>82501195
>People tend to conveniently forget US had a strong undercurrent of supporting eugenics until WW2 and Hitler shat the bad.

Do we? That was covered in my history classes as a kid, they wanted to make it clear that Hitler didn't just come out of nothing.

>>82501059
go live in arabia and figure out

>>82501340
>Do we? That was covered in my history classes as a kid, they wanted to make it clear that Hitler didn't just come out of nothing.
I think you're overestimating the quality of education in America and how intelligent the average American is (assuming you're American).

>>82501143
In mainstream non-western society eugenics are not just unpopular - they are hated with passion. Daily reminder that almost entire population of non-western world is poor AF, and thus extremely spiteful towards any sort of elites.

>>82501313
Let's go again:
>idea that america is under some kind of existential threat from a cabal of puritanical, far right christian conservatives
>idea that america is under some kind of existential threat
>as in "actual IRL America"
>is under some kind of existential threat
That's what that fag (you?) claimed to be the book's topic.

It is fucking not. It's like saying that Starship Troopers are pushing the idea of Earth being under some kind of existential threat from a nation of arthropodic, hiveminded aliens.

>>82497527
>>Everyone is super religious
>>women are treated as walking incubators, wear traditional clothing, not allowed to own anything and work
>>Homos get hanged on the streets as "gender traitors"

sounds like saudi arabia f-am. /pol/ would really fit in a muslim society

>>82497527
Are traps considered gay in this world? Even if they have a soft feminine penis?

>>82501476
Atwood never claimed that America was under the imminent threat of being taken over and wasn't intended to predict the future. Rather, it was intended to show that given the right circumstances (severely declining birth rates, etc.) the government could be hijacked by Christian extremists just as Iran and other countries were hijacked by Muslim extremists. Among other things, it was meant to be a counter to the voices saying "it could never happen here".

File: 1465462623300.jpg (25KB, 288x467px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 288x467px

>>82501039
>Also, the cabal is pretty much confirmed
Pic related

I mean yes, there is a class of cosmopolitan elites, but to think that they are in a state of any form of conscious mutually-beneficial agreement, as opposed to a lazy and largely incompetent competition, is kinda dumb.

Never mind that all the political power that they have exists only within a stage that national elites allow.

>>82501546
p. sure that you could find some traps at Jezebel's

>>82501476
ok so in your mind it is just a coincidence that margaret atwood made her villains a cabal of puritanical, far-right christian conservatives who take over america in a book published in the 1980s at the zenith of the religious right's influence in america. got it.

>>82501546
In Iran, traps actually aren't legally considered gay by the government, provided that they go the whole way and get surgery/hormones/etc. Still shunned by society though.

>>82501599
>Atwood never claimed that America was under the imminent threat of being taken over and wasn't intended to predict the future
That is my mother fucking point.

>>82501313
The word "literally" literally means "figuratively" or "by way of hyperbole." Go ask Merriam-Webster.

>>82501666
>who take over america in a book published in the 1980s at the zenith of the religious right's influence in america

Have you forgotten about the Iranian Revolution and the establishment of the world's largest theocracy in 1979? Iran was transformed overnight into a hyper-conservative theocratic state, look at pictures of Iran in the 70s vs the 80s.

That's clearly what this book is based on, not some politicians in America saying "God Bless" more than usual.

File: thtinanutshell.png (2KB, 652x27px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 652x27px

Is there anything else you actually need to know about this book

>>82501678
Hmmm.... The penis is the whole point though.
Boipussy>>>>>>>>>>>>>mutilated tranny "pussy"

>>82501748
It can mean two things.

>>82501751
The expression is "based off (of)" not "based on." How could something have its base *on* something else? That's just silly.

>>82501775
A woman enjoying sex? Better call the police!

>>82501751
kek i guess youve really drunk the kool aid that all civilizations are identical and that there is no real difference between america and iran because if iranian muslims do something then clearly western christians could do the same thing!

>>82501666
The main villain in First Avenger: Civil War is Sokovian. Sokovia is a poor country in Eastern Europe under a populist dictatorship, with strong Soviet aesthetics in it's architecture and culture, and where everyone speaks Russian.

Just when Age of Ultron was released NATO went through another height on tensions with Republic of Belarus - a poor country in Eastern Europe under a populist dictatorship, with strong Soviet aesthetics in it's architecture and culture, and where everyone speaks Russian, heavily criticizing country's joint military exercise with Russian Federation and supporting a brewing attempt at an uprising against the regime.

Marvel confirmed for using it's products to manipulate public opinion and bring down Lukashenko.

>>82497527
Pure trash

This movie should have been made about Islam but the (((feminist))) author wanted to make a statement against those ebil Christian whites!!111

>>82497854
She's raped habitually and has zero freedom you clueless fuckwad. Kill yourself.

>>82501998

"Raped"

File: 13-4.jpg (49KB, 420x579px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 420x579px

>>82501905
iare you really trying to argue that comic books arent used as propaganda?

>>82501998
>Habitually

>>82502052
So, Marvel IS working hard right now to bring down Lukashenko?

>>82502032
>>82502106
Great arguments

>>82501828
No, it's based on.

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/15081/based-on-instead-of-based-off-of

http://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2016/05/based-off.html

>>82502156

>Rape is a real thing

File: 241.jpg (74KB, 600x555px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 600x555px

>>82502110
more like autocrats in general but yes i think they would like their products to sway public opinion that way

theres a lot of political issues that comic books want to influence

>>82501998
She deserved to be raped after what she did

File: D169B65C-C5FE-46D8-A079-41FB9E2D12E6-20556-00000BE7BB9F240C_tmp.jpg (91KB, 400x350px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 400x350px

I tried to watch with my wife. 5 minutes in I decided the "villains" made more sense and dropped it.

Spent the remainder of the episode playing catch with my son in the backyard.

>>82501998
Whats your point? That's what women exist for, dummy.

>>82502201
That would only make sense if a lot of people read comic books. It's a really niche thing. If you want to influence public opinion you use tv and movies, not something being read by a bunch of nerds.

>>82502156
I'm not any of the anons arguing with you.
just found "habitual" rape funny

>>82502249
>5 minutes in I decided the "villains" made more sense and dropped it.

You thought a society where the vast majority of men weren't allowed to have sex, let alone have kids, and gay people were executed to be something you thought was a good idea? Something you agreed with?

>>82502249
Your wife's son?

File: face.png (11KB, 68x63px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 68x63px

>>82502052

>>82502296
hollywood has been consistently churning out big budget comic book movies for years now. it doesnt matter if no one reads the actual comic books because when they want the movies to get political they can say theyre just trying to be faithful to the source material. you really should think more about what gets put in your (((entertainment)))

>>82502331
It's not black and white, sweetie. I bet you think Bill Murry did something wrong in Groundhog Day. But the reality is, humans cease to be real in a neverending loop like that, and morality and the meaning of humanity in general become irrelevant. It's the same with this: you set a a setting so far fetched and fictitious that any relevancy to real life is no longer palpable. It's why people can eat animal meat with no moral hindsight.

>>82502331
The gay interracial druggy picnic flashback sealed the deal.

Someday you'll have a job, family, mortgage, car/boat payments and understand.

Or, you'll stay at the queer interracial picnic too long and realize you're the oldfag.

>>82502521
>The gay interracial druggy picnic
I see absolutely nothing wrong with any part of that other than the fact that I wasn't there

It is hilarious """feminists""" have to make up such trashy fanfics to find ways to be oppressed in fictional worlds.

This book is a product of a Canadian leftist who thought Ronald Reagan was going to institute a theocracy and invade her precious Canadian homeland.

What a crock of shit. A product of the last Cold War leftists who had watched their socialist utopias collape all over the world and were desperate to turn the US into the last target of their misguided fetish of power.

But for real Maggie Atwood sucks

>>82502566
Anon that wasn't real socialism.

>>82502334
Nah, my own flesh and blood. Red pulled enough to marry a 5/10 who cooks, cleans, and changes diapers.

>>82502643
Why the hell do you wear diapers?

>>82497527
It's a real thing? Fuck, I thought it was just something SNL made up for a skit last night.

>>82497854
What a cuck

File: asfd.jpg (596KB, 1698x1719px) Image search: [Google]

596KB, 1698x1719px

>>82497527
Nope, you can bet some republican producer is going to ruin it

>>82499659
>I don't blame women for all my problems, kikes and niggers are the ones to blame for that
I still blame women.
I mean sure kikes and niggers are bad sure , but I guarantee they wouldn't be half as bad if it weren't for their own women driving them to be evil.

File: 1484923668893.png (14KB, 770x472px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 770x472px

lmao at the statist cucks itt

File: DDE1564F-93E4-43C0-AF29-3385C364FEB6-20587-00000BEE944B6DEA_tmp.png (118KB, 635x400px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 635x400px

>>82502672
Makes me cum harder anon

>>82497667
So we're just going to ingore all the dirt poor people outside of tehran or all the people he tortured? Nah. must have been Mzzies triggered at the sight of a woman without a headscaf.

File: communism has never been tried 2.jpg (305KB, 793x1400px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 793x1400px

>>82502602
>muh "it wasn't real communism/socialism"

name 1 (one) successful 100% socialist state.

>>82503585
>So we're just going to ingore all the dirt poor people outside of tehran or all the people he tortured
In hindsight it would be an infinitly wiser decision.

File: ann.jpg (76KB, 800x396px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 800x396px

Female Bane for best girl? Literally talks and acts like him.

>>82503727
Norway

File: 1438470916731.png (460KB, 599x372px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 599x372px

>>82503585
>Nah. must have been Mzzies triggered at the sight of a woman without a headscaf

not that guy but that isn't implied at all in the post you replied to

all that was implied was that Shah era Iran or PDPA ruled Afganistan were once liberalised before becoming more conservative after those regimes went down in flames

an uptick in religious conservatism once a dictator shits the bed seems to be a common theme in the middle east(I guess since it is the easiest way to unite ayyabs and accrue power)

>>82503727
>name 1 (one) successful 100% socialist state.

the United States of America