Why does /tv/ insist that a true Lovecraftian film cannot be

>>82249240
Thread Approved

>>82249240
Because television and film are an inherently visual medium. It completely goes against the idea of "show don't tell".

>>82249240
Several have already been made. I'm sure you're familiar with them and I'm not going to list them.

>>82249240
Because he's racist.

>>82249240
PUREKINO Bloodborne has exhausted the Lovecraftian horror genre all on its own. There's no need for any films.

cuz bloodborne

Lovecraft is literal pleb tier pulp.
Why do normies like him so much?

>>82250838
>>82250695
Is Bloodborne actually Lovecraftian beyond the eldritch monster designs and shit?

>>82251863
>why do normies like pleb-tier stuff

>>82251908
Its dreams within dreams and you collect eldritch knowledge

I never understood how anyone was surprised by the second half. The first half is also full of lovecraft.

File: 1456743678302.jpg (83KB, 496x750px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 496x750px

>"our film is very lovecraft inspired"
>there's just lots of tentacles everywhere

>>82249240
>Why does /tv/ insist that a true Lovecraftian film cannot be made?
Instead of proving that it cannot which I strongly believe, let me ask you this: Has it ever been made? That answers it better I think.

>>82249240
>The inconceivable formless nightmare shit is usually just the backdrop.
What's the foreground then?

File: maxresdefault.jpg (126KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1280x720px

>Bloodbourne
Lmao. Kids these days.