Now that the dust has settled, what did you think of Nu-Busters? Will there be a sequel?
no
>>82227757
>>82227674
We're getting a comic sequel where 2016 GB meet IDW's Ghostbusters. #2 comes out this week. Surprised it didn't get a storytime on /co/ when #1 came out.
>>82227674
It's Jurassic World kind of bad, did not deserve the whole virgins uproar, still a pretty bad movie tho.
>>82229520
Want to know how I know you're a woman?
>>82229520
>It's Jurassic World kind of bad
Jurassic World had
-atttractive women
-attractive women that fucked up everything
-manly men that solved the problems
-manly men and attractive women working together to solve problems
-dinosaurs getting hit with RPGs
GB wishes it could have been at least a fraction of tolerable as that.
>>82229574
Go ahead.
>>82227674
It sucked but I hope there is a sequel. Man-bimbo Chris Hemsworth is top-tier husbando material.
>>82227674
I pray that Sony learned their lesson and leave this series dead. I'd rather have no Ghostbusters than shitty Ghostbusters.
>>82229616
Men don't use virgin as an insult to each other. It outs you instantly.
>>82229487
IDW: We're gonna shove this down your throat one way or another.
>>82230001
They call it (and i'm not making this up):
>The crossover YOU demanded
So far it's not a bad story (we only see 2016 GB on like two pages in #1 so that's a plus) but I have hope for it. The IDW people "get" what makes Ghostbusters great so they might be able to redeem the 2016 characters.
Why is Feig still allowed to do interviews where he pretends it was a success?
>>82227674
Yes because of that cunt Pascal
>>82229520
Jurassic World was cool, fuck you
Redhead second right is qt
>>82229520
At least Jurassic World was a full on sequel, whose reference were rooted in the fact that we were still in the same world.
It's not the best movie, but it's totally serviceable.