How important is an attractive main cast member to you when watching

>>82222324
>I find it hard to get interested in a show if there isn't anyone I find particularly attractive.
same

>>82222324
>over 30
>6.7/10 at best

>>82222324

You will probably get mocked for being a pleb, but my dad can't watch anything with an unattractive cast. Meanwhile any horrendous piece of shit show with a few hotties he will marathon to the end.

I don't know whether he's discovered internet porn yet.

I'm not a vapid simpleton so I don't care. If I'm watching something it's for the substance of it, not for the actors' appearance.

I find it hard to get interested in a show if there isn't anyone I find particularly unattractive. eg. the Breaking Bad.

File: sistine-rose-stallone-at-michael-kors-fashion-show-at-2017-nyfw-06.jpg (171KB, 1590x2385px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1590x2385px

>>82222484
>not watching shows to get ideas for what your imaginary gf would be like
>not creating memories of said imaginary gf before going to bed

I'm not the only one rrright?

>>82222324
For me it isn't really attractiveness but interesting. There are actors and actresses that aren't necessarily attractive but I find interesting in some way that make the difference. Bland looking attractive is probably the worst combo there is for a show.

File: 1483159487089.gif (4MB, 307x325px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 307x325px

>>82222694

Are you 15? Wtf is happening?

>>82222324
Jeez... it's really hard to not judge you based on that information. Especially after mentioning The Expanse, which is a typical "everyone is above average looking" show, albeit w/o a particularly pretty "main girl". I really, honestly, don't care about the cast's attractiveness unless it's a plot point (think avatars in VR or dystopian futures w/ genetically modified people etc.) and neither should you.

>>82222435
>over 30
What's that supposed to mean? I'm older than MEW and I say she's *at least* an 7.5/10.