>read the novels
>does all the stunts himself
>great movie plots
Can we all agree that he is the 2nd best Bond? The first spot obviously belonging to Connery.
1. Sean Connery
2. Timothy Dalton = Daniel Craig
3. Pierce Brosnan
4. Roger Moore
5. George Lazenby
Despite Lazenby's wooden acting, OHMSS is one of the greatest Bond films.
Up there with From Russia With Love.
>>82147403
Dude, how about this guy as Sherlock Holmes. he looks like sherlock holmes from books.
he is old tho
>>82147403
Change first spot to Craig and I agree.
>>82147468
If Connery had been post-synced as much as Lazenby was, he would have been thought wooden. Broccoli and Saltzman hadn't yet got the courage to recast properly, so Bond spends half the movie with a different actor's voice and in disguise.
>>82147403
License's antagonist was a huge flaw, w/ a better one it could have been great. Bond v Narcos is pretty great though.
>>82147403
Agreed.
>>82147468
>>82148079
>Daniel Craig
Craig is the WORST Bond. He's not even a real Bond imo he's a fucking Jason Bourne wannabe.
He can't act. He isn't funny. He isn't charming. And he looks like a fucking monkey with muscles.
>>82147403
He's the second best Bond, yes, but afterElba
>>82148211
>Craig is the WORST Bond
ok
No, he's actually the best
>>82148211
>and he looks like a monkey with muscles
Just wait till the next bond.
>>82148211
Don't confuse the editing with the acting. Craig is the best technical actor to play the role with the possible exception of Dalton, and has terrific dry wit.
Dalton G.O.A.T.
>>82148297i see wut u did there
>>82148297
At least Idris is "handsome" and can act swarve. Look at this fucking thing. LOOK
>>82147403
arguing "who is the best Bond" is like arguing "who is the best guitar player"
>>82148211
Craig is an okay Bond but Quantum and the last one were honestly just pretty shit movies.
>>82148389
Looks even worse with his fucking monkey ears
>hi, im bond..
Fuck off are you Bond. You're not even half a Bond.
Reminder based Brosnan is the best all-round Bond.
Reminder he could do action, comedy and still charm the fuck outta women.
Reminder his movies are criminally underrated.
Reminder women's vaginas dry up at the mere sight of Dalton.
>>82147403
This is the correct order:
1. Connery
2. Brosnan
3. Moore
4. Dalton
5. Craig
6. Lazenby
Anybody who denies this is either baiting or a retard.
>>82148297
I loffed
>>82148529
He's effeminate. He's the Judy Garland's-fifth-husband version of Bond. People forget how cucked the nineties were.
>>82147403
you forgot
>is the closest looking of all the actors to how Ian Fleming himself drew James Bond
I think Dalton is number one. Connery is a little too goofball, Dalton was more to the point and had an aggressiveness to the way he did things.
>>82148828
It's bizarre how despite working on this character for so long the guy's idea of his appearance was
>le suave masculine englishman
>>82147403
>Can we all agree that he is the 2nd best Bond? The first spot obviously belonging to Brosnan.
Yes we can.
>>82148211
>fucking Jason Bourne wannabe
People said Licence to Kill was trying to ape American action movies when it came out, but those comparisons have waned over time.
>>82148888
What did you expect, a fat American slob?
also dem quads
>>82148888
What the fuck else would he look like? Bond is part of a long lineage of boys' adventure heroes. Think Richard Hannay or Nayland Smith.
>>82148211
The worst thing is that hes fucking BLONDE
get outta town, you Putin faced blondie bitch
>>82147403
Dalton just did not have the mannerisms, he was not debonair, he always had that perplexed blank grin on his face
Dalton looks like Bond and was in good films but desu he feels nothing like Bond.
Salt corrosion.
>>82148828
This. Connery's features are much too clumsy
>>82147468
When you make a joint spot, it takes up two places.
Pierce Brosnan should be 4th, Moore 5th and Lazenby 6th because Dalton and Craig take up both 2nd and 3rd.
>>82147403
>loved the living daylights
>watched the Calvin Dyson review where he points out that there should've been a scene with bond protecting m at the embassy, and gogol should've been in it instead of pushkin
>can't look at it the same way
>>82147403
Oldfag here & I agree OP.
He just got shit upon constantly from day one because 80's folks couldn't get Brosnan out of their heads.
>>82147403
He deserved more films. He was such a refreshing change from the final few Moore films.
>>82147403
>reminder Dalton would have started in many more Bond movies
>but licensing disagreements forced the studios to put them on hold.
>By the time they'd sorted it all out Dalton said he felt he was too old to play the part any more.
That makes me more sadder than I'd like.
>>82152125
Up to that point there was a Bond film every 2 years but MGM fell out with United Artists and cucked Dalton out of his 3rd Bond movie.
It took 7 years to get the license back and by that time Dalton had gone. Enter the super suave Pierce Brosnan.
>itt: queenkuks
SAD
>>82147403
Yes
>>82148211
So much yes