Why don't horror films make $100 millions like fantasy

>>82065546
in what was was beauty and the beast not a horror film?

I'll wait.

Except they do.
Typically on a much smaller budget with much larger returns.

>>82065546
because horror is not trending anymore, and that's pretty good

>September
>IT
Just wait, bro

Budget $15,000
Box office $193.4 million

Guess the """movie""".

What even is the origin of that fucking picture?

>>82065662
Paranormal Activity.

File: 1454511491013.jpg (68KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 500x500px

Paranormal Activity (2007)
Budget: $28 mil
Sales: $889 mil

Paranormal Activity 2 (2010)
Budget: $3 mil
Sales: $177 mil

Paranormal Activity 3 (2011)
Budget: $5 mil
Sales: $200 mil

Paranormal Activity 4 (2012)
Budget: $5mil
Sales: $142 mil

>>82065662
Was it ur moms sex tape

>>82065693
Damn.

>>82065662
Blair Witch Project?

>>82065742

First one is supposed to be a summary of the entire franchise

the first movie was more like 11,000 budget with 200 mil sales

>>82065769
No, >>82065693 is right.
Though it probably omits marketing costs.

>>82065777
You're forgetting about distribution which costs a considerable amnt

Budget $60,000 (est.)
Box office $248.6 million

This shit cost 60k?

>>82065757
Did...did you think that was a difficult question? Anyone that has more than a passing interest in film would know that right off that bat, especially when primed with the context of the thread. You have to be a complete film embryo that lives in a bubble to not know that.

>>82065769
YIKES. What an idiot.

>>82065834
Do...Do you think you're not a faggot? Because...Because you kinda gave yourself away with that. Maybe...maybe your should kill yourself.

>Saw 1
>"Saw was given a production budget of between $1 million and $1.2 million."
>Box office: $103.9 million