[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

>it's a Bill Nye rants to the I F*cking Love Science

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 387
Thread images: 51

File: listen up, goyim.jpg (108KB, 1024x645px) Image search: [Google]
listen up, goyim.jpg
108KB, 1024x645px
>it's a Bill Nye rants to the I F*cking Love Science crowd about how privileged white males need to be exterminated to usher in an era of tolerance and scientific enlightenment

Beakman would never stoop this low.
>>
Why are women so selfish?

https://youtu.be/EgenYg3uK3w
>>
File: honest bill nye.jpg (469KB, 2466x1335px) Image search: [Google]
honest bill nye.jpg
469KB, 2466x1335px
>Though the TV show is hosted by Nye, five correspondents assist in the presentation of the show. These include fashion model Karlie Kloss, science YouTuber and educator Derek Muller, comedian Nazeem Hussain, comedian and writer Joanna Hausmann, and the TV host and producer Emily Calandrelli.[4][5] The show also features guest appearances from Zach Braff, Donald Faison, Rachel Bloom, Gus Sorola, Geoff Ramsey, Joel McHale, Wil Wheaton, Jonna Mae[6], Steve Aoki, and Tim Gunn.[3]

Damn look at all these scientists.
>>
>>81958482
>Emily "space exploration is the worst" Calandrelli
>american "scientists"
>>
What's that I Fucking Love Science crowd you're talking about?
>>
>>81958700
You have to be 18+ to post here
>>
File: comeon.jpg (31KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]
comeon.jpg
31KB, 600x375px
>mechanical engineer
>scientist
>>
>>81958759

I am 23, thank you very much.

I just genuinely think that post was invoking a subculture I'm not sure actually exists.
>>
>That tittle
How can people be this blatantly narcissistic I will never understand
>>
>>81958700
you could literally google that name and fing the facebook page
>>
DUDE FEMINISM IS GONNA SAVE THE WORLD AND NOT FURTHER FUCK IT UP LMAO
>>
>>81958834
It exists. Also 23 is too young, you wouldn't understand
>>
>>81958834

Go to Normiebook and search the phrase.
>>
>>81958834
Its a facebook group for underage wannabe 'scientists' who quote cosmos and futurama as their sources.

If you like being surrounded by people who always think they are the smartest people in the room I'd check it out. Otherwise you aren't missing anything.
>>
>>81958482
I don't think I can watch this with Karlie Kloss in it. If you go on /g/, you know what I mean.
>>
>>81958881
who killed the world, anon?
>>
>>81958700
Reddit
>>
Why are you ao threatened by a Netflix show
>>
>>81959532
Why are you so threatened by reality?
>>
The show really bores me. The show offers no new talking points to whatever topic the episode is about that I haven't heard from some YouTube video. Bill treats the audience/viewer as kids even though the show is target to adults. I watched the first couple of episodes then skip to the sexual spectrum episode and it really offer anything new besides saying sex is spectrum.
>>
>>81958871
> title melody is
> bill bill bill bill bill bill bill saves the woooorld
>>
>>81958482
Well at least it's comforting to know that no actual scientists wanted to be associated with this piece of shit
>>
>>81958365
For a 80-year old, this cunt has a really punchable face.
>>
>>81959948
> we have this interesting topic today
> brings out celebs to give a short summary
> wow, i didn't know that, didn't we learn a lot?
> literally information that every adult should at least have heard once
> counter-points being ignored and silenced
> nobody wants nuclear plants, that's why they're bad

Watch Hot Girls Turned on, it's more interesting and educational than this show.
>>
>it's a conservatives are triggered by the mere mention of the word science episode

You'd think they'd learn after decades of being mocked.
>>
>>81959532
>stop critiquing television
I hope you realize how retarded you sound
>>
>>81960179

Wait, did they seriously shit on nuclear power?
>>
>>81960194
>television
What did he mean by this?
>>
>>81960222
What did he meme by this?
>>
>>81958482
>Gus Sorola, Geoff Ramsey
Wow, a has-been hosting some never-will-bes.
>>
>>81960222
electrical apparatus for receiving audio and video broadcast?
>>
>>81960213
Not even, Bill literally said
> no one wants them
Twice as a counterargument, then interrupted him and let the other people answer most of the questions.
They didn't even touch on thorium and the likes.
They invite the guy and then basically told him to be quiet, so they could show how much 'better' the alternative is.
Also,
> it 'll take 15 years to built a single plant, that's not fast enough
> but it is enough time to switch to 100% renewable energy
>>
File: science.gif (2MB, 425x247px) Image search: [Google]
science.gif
2MB, 425x247px
>>81960464

What terrible and bitter irony. Looks like I'm cleaning out my reaction folder.
>>
>>81960464
fucking Americans not even once
>>
CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING
>actually benefit from white male privilege when it still existed
>feel guilty and help eradicate it
>tell young white males it still exists and make them feel bad if they try to succeed while putting them at the bottom of the totem pole, destroying western society as we know it
>>
>>81960464
This really bothered me. They even edit the conversations that they have in each episode. Without offering an unedited cut
>>
>>81960645
They even cut during a person is talking
>>
BILL NYE THE CÚCKOLD GUY
>>
>>81960645
>This really bothered me.
You could watch the nuclear supporter get more frustrated every minute. Started out with an friendly trying to argue for his cause.
Ends with him pitching a word or two, when the other two guys are struggling to find the right ones.
I also had the feeling they cut right before the retort on several occasions.
>>
>>81958404
>Sargon of Akkad

Stop shilling this furry
>>
File: 1391361374069 - Copy.jpg (111KB, 584x622px) Image search: [Google]
1391361374069 - Copy.jpg
111KB, 584x622px
>>81958365

Oh nice it's another alt right pussies get triggered by everything thread. Keep looking like the SJWs you keep fighting. It's not ironically hilarious or anything.
>>
>>81960464
>>81960572
>wanting an unregulated disaster waiting to happen in your backyard
By all means, nuclear power plants have decades of exemplary safety history.

Don't be dumb. Nuclear power is an option but it's hardly safe. "It won't happen this time" is not an argument.
>>
>>81960806
>I hate nuclear power!
>>
>>81958482
This isn't even a science show, it's straight up leftist propaganda
>Steve Aoki
Who the fuck wants to know what he thinks of science when he can't even make good music?
>Karlie Kloss
Yes, let's all listen to Taylor Swift's girlfriend drone on about "we need more refugees."

Who the fuck is this show for?
>>
>>81960806
>redditspacing
>>
>>81960843

Statistically speaking more people die from falling wind turbines than die from nuclear radiation from power plants, unless our ability to build safe nuclear reactors actively plummets the safety record isn't going to change.
>>
File: wew.jpg (689KB, 1312x2048px) Image search: [Google]
wew.jpg
689KB, 1312x2048px
>>81960183
Tell me more about your science.
>>
>>81960892
>Who the fuck is this show for?
4U
>>
>>81960913
>unless our ability to build safe nuclear reactors actively plummets
That's why I mentioned deregulation.
>>
>>81960954
>muh false colour images
It doesnt actually look like that
>>
File: 147109237748588.png (3MB, 1690x1690px) Image search: [Google]
147109237748588.png
3MB, 1690x1690px
>>81960806
>needing to space fucking twice to be double the reddit
>>
>>81960806
>falseflagging as a dumb redditor to make /pol/ look good
please stop and go back to your Nazi board
>>
>>81960986
Oh, i get it. If the plants aren't kept safe they are unsafe. That's true, that's however also true for everything else.
> any major factory will destroy it's immediate surrounding through massive pollution. You know, if they're unregulated.
>>
>>81961019
dude muh flat earth moon landing nasa cuntspiracies xD
>>
File: 1482469604303.jpg (100KB, 750x853px) Image search: [Google]
1482469604303.jpg
100KB, 750x853px
Let me get this straight:
Bill Nye is enabling leftists to live in a fantasy land where biology and genetics don't mean anything. And this guy claims to be a scientist?
>>
>>81961122
>falseflagging as a /tv/ user to advertise you Nazi board.
You're the one who needs to go.
>>
>>81961150
>That's true
Thanks, I don't need anything else.
>>
>>81961019
Shhh... don't tell them that those galaxies and nebulae only look like that from a specific angle and most likely don't exist in the condition that we see them now. Or that actual science is a bunch of very complicated math, beyond the physical mechanics they're aware from high school physics. They can't run basic Stoichiometry, but they can rave about dyson spheres and "maaaan the evidence is there for climate change don't be a trump voter, climate change is the most important issue today." All fluff, no crunch, if you understand that vernacular.
>>
Why do people pay attention to Bill Nye The Bachelor Degree In Engineering Guy? He's a fucking TV personality. His opinions have the same weight as the other tens of millions of engineering students. He was on a show many years ago reading a script. Fuck Bill Nye.
>>
>>81961230
> puts fingers in his ears
> lalalalalalalalalalala
>>
>>81961229
Except you're the one who's actually doing that right here >>81960806
Just fuck off from here already you fucking tourist
>>
Bill Nye the political activist masquerading as an objective science guy
>>
>>81961289
>my claim is deregulation can create unsafe conditions for nuclear plants to succeed
>you concede to that point
And we need to continue our silly argument why?
>>
File: 1492912470073.jpg (217KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]
1492912470073.jpg
217KB, 1200x900px
>>81961271
The greatest authority to millenials are character's from their childhood. Nye even says his show is for "grown children"
>>
>>81958985
hahaha Kode with Karlie is going to be the show's computer expert
>>
>>81961297
>samefagging this hard
Go back to your discord nazi
>>
>>81960843
>>81960986
>>81961230
>>81961321
>the target audience of Bill Nye the Cuckold Guy
>>
>>81958482

Leftists sure do love celebrities.
>>
>>81961416
>no arguments
Don't be sad, someone else will come along and engage in a 40 post chain of shitposting.
>>
>>81961464
The guy you were arguing with did make an argument, but you said
>I don't need anything else
Just like Bill Nye the Cukold Guy
>>
>>81961416
>expecting anything from people that believe Bill Nye is a legitimate, successful scientist
>>
>>81961423
>actor tweets
>"is x conservative faggot /ourguy/????"

Yeah, liberals just love to worship those celebrities.
>>
>>81961356
alot of "scientists" out in my town yesterday too
>>
>>81958482
I only know Zach Braff and Wil Wheaton out of these. What a star-studded cast.
>>
File: 1487149747409.png (87KB, 564x619px) Image search: [Google]
1487149747409.png
87KB, 564x619px
>>81961464
>claims he won the argument but immediately leaves the thread
What did he mean by this?
>>
>>81961490
>did make an argument
One I was not interested in and one that had nothing to do with him conceding to my point. Last reponse, enjoy the (You).
>>
>>81961405
>doesn't even know what samefagging is
Looking he's either reddit, or a /pol/ posing as a dumb redditor. Just look at the way he types >>81960806
>>
File: 563JJJ.jpg (63KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]
563JJJ.jpg
63KB, 700x700px
Engineers are scientists too, okay!
CS literally has the word SCIENCE in it
>>
>>81961532
>leaves
I didn't know I had to keep responding to retards in order to stay in the thread. But hey, have a (You). Samefagging deserves a treat.
>>
>>81961544
Thank you for confirming my point. That's all I needed to hear.
>>
>>81961554
Stop counersignalling his signalling and starting to signal when I countersignal your signal you shill.
>>
>>81961510

I don't see Republicans parading around celebrities for their events or including them in propaganda.
>>
>this thread
I'm glad we #march'd against you losers yesterday.
>>
>>81961510
>I can't detect sarcasm
>>
>>81960843
>unregulated
uwot
>>
>>81961321
> unregulated dangerous things can be dangerous
> so we shouldn't meddle with them at all

> what is fire, explosives, cars, drugs, space and airtravel
>>
>>81961510
>"is x conservative faggot /ourguy/????"

Somebody's mad that the left has lost its grip on /tv/, I see...
>>
>>81961623
Yeah you sure showed the world what exactly? Oh right, I saw you on the news and went on with my day. Get a job you nigger.
>>
>>81961265
dumb trump supporter
>>
File: 1492922459751.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]
1492922459751.jpg
3MB, 5312x2988px
>>81961623
Where you there too, what did your sign say? Here's mine.
>>
>>81961496
show was called "science guy” not "scientist"
>>
>>81961659
>> unregulated dangerous things can be dangerous
>> so we shouldn't meddle with them at all
Nice strawman.
>>
File: 1482510506220.jpg (44KB, 984x720px) Image search: [Google]
1482510506220.jpg
44KB, 984x720px
>>81961727
Holy shit bro you just blew that guy the fuck out
>his literal face when owned hard by anonymous 81961727
>>
>>81961756
Tell that to his fans.
>>
>its a children are insulted by a guy who made a show for kids thread
>>
>>81960843
>nuclear power is an option
>but if this thing that'll never happen happens then it's bad
hmmm really made me think
>>
>>81961818
see >>81958482
>>
>>81961822
>>but if this thing that'll never happen happens
But it's happened before. Are you seriously denying reality?
>>
I fucking love science
>>
>>81961818
I'm insulted by him pushing a political agenda under the guise of science.
>>
>>81961818
>"Stop insulting Billy you dumb x-tians! I grew up loving science because of him you nazis!"
>>
>>81961782
Assuming you're not trolling, what's your concrete issue with nuclear power?
The waste, the potential chernobyl, that it's still not renewable energy or do you fear human error?
I agree that we shouldn't rely on it forever, but it's a good option to turning of| more polluting power plants, such as coal.
also, there has been a lot of innovations that make it very difficult to create a meltdown situation.
>>
>>81958482
>Bill Nye using presenters that aren't old Almost Live! castmembers.
Disgusting. The only one that belongs there is Joel McHale.
>>
>>81961902
When did nuclear safety regulations in the United States decrease?
>>
>>81961955
Safety and waste management.
>>
>>81961568

I'm a mechanical engineer and the thought of myself being a scientist has never occured to me. That's probably because I'm not insane.
>>
I fucking love science. Too bad the world is going to be completely flooded within a decade as a result of the climate warming a few degrees even though it hasn't gotten warmer at all in the past 15 years. Despite knowing this is going to happen with 100% certainly (97% percent of all scientists agree after all) I'm not going to sell my Florida residence and move in-land. In fact I'm not going to change anything about my life. I'm just going to keep saying that disastrous anthropogenic climate change is occurring but I'm not going to live like I really believe that because that would just be too inconvenient.

I just wish all those dumb anti-science conservative would change their lives so the world doesn't get destroyed. Now excuse me, I need to go buy some non-GMO bread because that's a thing.
>>
>>81962025
>safety
If you look at death per TWh, it's the safest way there is to produce energy.
>waste management
The volume of long-lasting radioactive products is actually surprisingly small.
>>
>>81960843
>>81961902
Can you give me several(if any) examples where a nuclear failure was caused because of a part failure or shitty design? Nearly every nuclear disaster I've heard of was due to negligence and lack of maintenance which is all down to lazy fucking humans.
>>
>>81962025
Did you already look into newer options like Thorium reactors and safe guards?
They seem very safe and produce little waste, that is afair not even radioactive.
Imho, it boils down to
One potential chernobyl
Vs.
Existing pollution being continued
I'd rather take the potential pollution over existing one.
>>
>>81961737
>what did your sign say?
I just wore this shirt to let the womyn know I'm free to ponder the universe together.
>>
File: reaer.jpg (166KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]
reaer.jpg
166KB, 800x534px
Liberals are going to be so disappointed when they eventually learn what it takes to create and maintain those "clean" solar panels.
>>
File: 23.jpg (163KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]
23.jpg
163KB, 1024x683px
>>81962025

What specifically is the problem with waste management? We can bury that shit deep underground in the desert. It's a complete non problem.
>>
File: 1475180389653.png (108KB, 357x368px) Image search: [Google]
1475180389653.png
108KB, 357x368px
>tfw too smart to believe in Jesus
>>
Bill Nye the Alimony and child support for his wife's son guy
>>
>>81958482
>The show also features guest appearances from
celebrities that aren't famous or rich enough to actually be doing movies instead and desperately try to milk the last few minutes of their fame for a quick buck.

Surprised they didn't include Felicia Day and Patton Oswalt into the mix
>>
>>81960804
>furry
????????????????????
>>
File: 1453860067976.png (175KB, 539x612px) Image search: [Google]
1453860067976.png
175KB, 539x612px
>>81964962

They're too busy ruining MST3K.
>>
>>81960892
>who the fuck is this show for
It's a youth outreach program to get them to vote democrat.
>>
>>81961184
>that image
What if the person saying this is intersex?
>>
>>81961356
What an inconsequential, and downright childish thing, the "march for science" was. What are these marches supposed to accomplish other than giving MSM a narrative that Drumpf is "anti-science". Dude has already given NASA more funding than Clinton, Bush or Obama did during each of thier eight-year terms.
>>
>>81965298

But he isn't doing what leftists want when it comes to climate change, which is to do expensive things that have no effect. That means he's anti-science.
>>
>this show is for adults
>filled with infantile ideas
so it's for kids that want to pretend to be adults?
>>
So basically

>science: astronomy, biology, geology, physics, chemistry
>Science™: climate change, trannies, "space (it's so cool!)", BLM, Rick and Morty
>>
I wanna have a march for philosophy.
>>
>>81965400
It's pretty much "My first science lesson!" but wrapped around a "mature and smart adults only" label to get people in with some basic science lessons and push agendas

>..by using this method. We could all be driving electric cars in a month!
>But that won't work when you take into account the charge times and overhaul on the current netw-
>UH OH! WE HAVE A SCIENCE DENIER!
>DENIER DENIER DENIER!
>>
File: _73542746_177537883.jpg (47KB, 624x351px) Image search: [Google]
_73542746_177537883.jpg
47KB, 624x351px
>>81965725
B-But my Niel Degrasse Mike Tyson!!!
>>
>>81965174

Why do you think that changes anything
>>
File: whitescienceman.jpg (294KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
whitescienceman.jpg
294KB, 1920x1080px
What happens when tumblr and science become one?
>>
>>81966138

What the fuck is this
>>
>>81960897
that's not reddit spacing it's a single line of text
>>
>>81966138
Wait, is that the guy from Veritasium?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMByI4s-D-Y
>>
>>81961601
>I don't see Republicans parading around celebrities for their events or including them in propaganda.

You're right. they just elect them president.

It's not even the first time they've done this.
>>
File: nothing.jpg (8KB, 220x180px) Image search: [Google]
nothing.jpg
8KB, 220x180px
>That straight on racist LOL WHITE PEOPLE comedy bit in episode 2
>That panel of three "experts" who have one minute each to tell how they agree on Bill's view and if one disagrees he will be laughed at at cut off
>That pointless elementary school level experiment segment
>That fist bumping
>"THAT'S COOL"

I just want to hear about science, not this irrelevant bullshit. Feels like I'm watching some nickelodeon show.
>>
>>81966138
I'm way too lazy to watch 30 minutes of this shit, but did they AT THE VERY LEAST admit that there are inherent psychological differences between the two genders? Gender as a spectrum is actually a scientific sound idea, but only if you accept that men and women are different psychologically (on average) . Too much of these hacks jump at the chance of using the gender spectrum to defend trannies but then back down when topics like women in STEM come up.
>>
This shit is painful and the political messages being shoved down your throat in every segment is actually pretty surreal.
>>
>>81965298
Science is a meaningless buzzword now and it's all thanks to that stupid Facebook page
>>
>>81966453
What did you expect? Bill Nye made a children's show that people remember fondly because they got to watch TV during school instead of learning.
>>
>>81966453

Can you imagine if this is how science was taught in school? My God, I don't know how anyone would be able to handle this garbage. I LOVED my science courses, but this is turning my stomach.
>>
>>81958365
>it's a Bill Nye makes a joke about Christians not being people episode
>>
File: BillNye-RedHerringGuy (1).jpg (59KB, 480x563px) Image search: [Google]
BillNye-RedHerringGuy (1).jpg
59KB, 480x563px
>>
>>81960183
>>81960806
>/tv/ criticizes Bill Nye's new show
>redditors jump to defend it

Every time
>>
>>81960806
>Keep looking like the SJWs you keep fighting
When you left wing idiots realize we dont give a shit about looking morally in the right?

Call us bad people all you want it wont stop us from wanting to kill you.
>>
>>81958783
>B.S. in mechanical engineering

Dumb fuck couldn't even be bother with a masters
>>
File: 12.png (645KB, 611x715px) Image search: [Google]
12.png
645KB, 611x715px
I wonder if Bill considers the lack of hurricanes in recent years to be evidence that climate change is not real.
>>
>>81960116
For something to be considered science, it has to be proven using this thing called 'the scientific method'.
Repeatably.
>>
>>81958365
So
>HAHAHAHAHA
climate change
>HAHAHAHAHA
is ah...
>HAHAHAHAHA
a terrible threat to...
>HAHAHAHAHAHA
the human race.
>HAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>81966888
How the fuck are we supposed to stop a shrimp that huge
>>
I have an associates degree in computer science can I be a scientist too?
>>
>>81967288
implying this isnt all going according to netfuxes stir shit up plan.
>>
>>81958482
>Rachel Bloom

Any good boob webms?
>>
>>81967288
Here's your reply
>>
>>81967285
If it bleeds, we can kill it. Seafood for weeks.
>>
>>81961601
>>
>>81961601
>Republicans LITERALLY elected a man to the presidency just because he was a celebrity
yep sure...
>>
>>81966888
Define 'recent.'
>>
>>81967870

they LITERALLY elected him because the liberals actually managed to produce a worse candidate by congealing an emotionless establishment robot into a wrinkly human flesh suit.

hillary clinton managed to be A WORSE CANDIDATE THAN DONALD TRUMP

that is a fucking achievement
>>
File: 1492265864477.png (381KB, 601x601px) Image search: [Google]
1492265864477.png
381KB, 601x601px
>>81958365
>/tv/ hasn't been this asspained since the new Ghostbusters trailer.
Holy shit, I hope some of you get paid for all these threads. Christ.
>>
File: 1492752768751.jpg (48KB, 532x427px) Image search: [Google]
1492752768751.jpg
48KB, 532x427px
>>81958404
>affirmative action for men
WEW LAD
>>
>>81967912

The past few years, maybe even the past 10. There has been a lot less hurricanes than normal.
>>
>>81958871
Not understanding sacrasm or irony is a sign of autism, I am pretty sure.
>>
Bill Cuck...the libtard guy...woah...
>>
>>81960194
At one point does spamming the same thread over and over until I want to kill myself, constitute as no longer criticism anymore?
>>
>>81968050
>p-please stop criticizing things
>>
>>81968290
If you think these threads are "criticisms", you are either baiting, new or brain damaged.
>>
File: 1492902401636.png (228KB, 858x725px) Image search: [Google]
1492902401636.png
228KB, 858x725px
>>81968290
You hypocrites literally say the same shit about shows mocking conservatives
>hey man, why do you got to spam this shit for amirite?
But when you faggots spend days spamming this show, all of a sudden it is "criticism". Literally kill yourself you r/_the donald shill.
>>
>>81968215
>look ma, I said it again!
>>
>>81968248
*what
>>
>>81967781
How many chromosomes are in that room?
>>
>>81968347
Ah yes there couldn't any kind of criticism for this perfect show am I right?

>>81968423
Very good counter point fellow redditor, no assumptions at all only hard fact5.
>>
>>81968470

gotcha, triggered lefty hehe

>wahh why isn't real life more like twitter and reddit

oh it shows hehe
>>
>>81960464
Only problem with nuclear energy is its waste as we have no way to dispose or re use it safely and properly.
But renewable shit like wind and solar are fucking incredibly
Inefficient for the amount of space they take up
>>
>>81968593
I'd love for you to explain how I'm triggered.
>>
File: 1492465814592.png (27KB, 741x609px) Image search: [Google]
1492465814592.png
27KB, 741x609px
>>81968563
>Ah yes there couldn't any kind of criticism for this perfect show am I right?
Literally never said that, aspie. If you don't see this as spamming every hour on the hour, you must be a shill. Please tell me you get paid for these threads. Does Breitbart or Daily Mail pay in NEETbucks now?
>TEEHEE YOU REBBIT
Oh no, how will I ever recover? I was called r-rebbit! Everyone knows that there is no coming back from that! Wow!

Hang yourself.
>>
>>81968698

You got mad when I was being sarcastic. That proves you were too mad or autistic to see I was being sarcastic. Meaning you're triggered. It's all a scientific formula really 2bh
>>
>>81968644
That's the point, they are so inefficient that the assertion that renewable energies cause less impact on the environment is seriously shaky. And in any case at some point in the future building spaceships will be cheap enough that we can send nuclear waste to the sun or some shit.
>>
>>81968791
No I don't this threads every hour and if there was a modicum of truth in that you would already have backed that up with catalog screencaps.
>>
>>81968831
People throw around libtard unironically constantly but this one time, you were "sarcastic" in a thread where it's said maybe three times every minute? Yeah, sorry I didn't pay attention to your 12D chess, ruse game. Look how triggered I am. Must be easy to just dismiss anything people say to you with a "le triggered" meme.

#literallyshaking
>>
>>81961510
>what is irony
>>
>>81968901
>these threads haven't been spammed constantly for days.
So, you new here then? Got your folder full of spicy r/4chan memes ready to go kiddo? Teehee!
>>
>>81968538
Enough for an extra three or four people I imagine.
>>
>>81968927
>being this mad

Woah I honestly didn't mean to trigger you this much. I feel like I should apologise at this point
>>
>it's a /pol/ gets triggered by scientific facts episode
>>
>>81969273
Yes the same kind of scientific facts that said the north pole should have melted by now.
>>
>>81969366
North Pole is melting.
>melted by now
Nobody said that.
>>
File: 13.png (199KB, 357x266px) Image search: [Google]
13.png
199KB, 357x266px
>>81958365
>the solution to over population is empowering women
>not stopping mass immigration to countries with declining birthrates in order to prevent the population from shrinking because of fears of economic stagnation despite entering an era of growing automation that will require shrinking labor forces in developed nations in the near future
>>
>>81969257
Kid, people aren't just triggered because you will them to be.
>>
>>81969532
It's amazing how (((they))) can push overpopulation and low birth rates at the same time.
>>
>>81969564
[citation needed]
>>
>>81969273
>but when you post proof that races are different biologically suddenly leftie an heros
>>
>>81969587
>leftie an heros
Nice spelling
>>
File: al-gore-hot-air.jpg (27KB, 430x317px) Image search: [Google]
al-gore-hot-air.jpg
27KB, 430x317px
>>81969434
>North Pole is melting.
Nope
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses/

>Nobody said that.
Al Gore did
>>
File: Pete--Galactus_low_angle.jpg (514KB, 1100x915px) Image search: [Google]
Pete--Galactus_low_angle.jpg
514KB, 1100x915px
>>81959157
>>
>>81969532
jews gonna jew
>>
>>81969532
Your solution is also pretty much bullshit to overpopulation.
Overpopulation is happening in poor as fuck countries, letting them in richer countries changes nothing.
Overpopulation in these poor countries can be solved by
a) just letting them die
b)increase their standard of living on a level that is not dependant on several offspring

Currently people do a mixture of both because they dont want to feel bad about those poor people dying while worsening the overall problem.
>>
>>81969620
>"We’re essentially in agreement with other studies that show an increase in ice discharge in the Antarctic Peninsula and the Thwaites and Pine Island region of West Antarctica,” said Jay Zwally, a glaciologist with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and lead author of the study, which was published on Oct. 30 in the Journal of Glaciology. “Our main disagreement is for East Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica – there, we see an ice gain that exceeds the losses in the other areas.” Zwally added that his team “measured small height changes over large areas, as well as the large changes observed over smaller areas.”

>But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
>>
>>81969666
satan trips make me choose a
>>
>>81958482
this show seems to be tailored for nu-male manchildren. I hope none of you guys are actually watching it.
>>
>>81969620
>Zwally said that while other scientists have assumed that the gains in elevation seen in East Antarctica are due to recent increases in snow accumulation, his team used meteorological data beginning in 1979 to show that the snowfall in East Antarctica actually decreased by 11 billion tons per year during both the ERS and ICESat periods. They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time.

At least read the fucking thing
>>
>>81960843

Actually NO nigger faggot. Nuclear energy is pretty great when stable good scientists and engineers work on it. Chenobl (spelling....Russia) was mostly due to poor engineering and lack of regulations and such.

Only problem is keeping it away from harsh weather and making sure only the top workers handle it

>Also wind and Solar are shit tier and don't even generate enough energy to run say a city

>America/Canada have enough oil and the like to never need foreign oil again for a long time

>Liberals think a pipe line will ruin the world

>Not china or russia or saudia Arabia that dont give two shits about green laws or some environment shit

>Liberals think Muslim blood oil is somehow better

>Liberals still think solar and wind are good

>Liberals still afraid of nuclear energy
>>
>>81969620
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/10/27/the-antarctic-ice-sheet-is-growing-but-it-doesnt-mean-global-warming-isnt-real/#5677ebb26a88
>Antarctica is losing about 92 billion tons [4] (100 km3) of land ice annually, or more than 3 times as much sea ice as it is gaining.
>>
>>81969688
So it is not melting YET even though "scientists" have being saying other wise for years.

>>81969752
>At least read the fucking thing
Have you read what you quoted?
North pole is not melting, deal with it.
>>
>>81969862
Who gives a shit if the planet is getting hotter thats just a natural process you cant stop so shut up already.
>>
>>81969888
Imagine being this stupid.
>>
>>81967285
Kek
>>
>>81965298
Funded by george soros by the way.
>>
>>81969862
>The Antarctic Ice Sheet Is Growing
Literally in the title.
>>
>>81969833
>Also wind and Solar are shit tier and don't even generate enough energy to run say a city
This is literally not true.
>America/Canada have enough oil and the like to never need foreign oil again for a long time
Kek, what? Are you a shill? Sprry Exxon, you and coal are going to die soon.
>Liberals think a pipe line will ruin the world
Look up how often pipelines break, spill or ruin environments. Did you think that was a meme?
>Not china or russia or saudia Arabia that dont give two shits about green laws or some environment shit
China now has more money invested in green energy and reversing CO2 emissions more than the US. Let that sink in. "B-BUT CLIMATE CHANGE A CHINESE HOAX!"
>Liberals think Muslim blood oil is somehow better
No liberal I know is pro-foreign oil or pro-foreign interventions in the Middle East.
>Liberals still think solar and wind are good
They are.
>Liberals still afraid of nuclear energy
Afraid of wastes.
>>
>>81969935
Sea ice grew, but land ice melted more. And there's still way less ice than 30 years before.
>>
>>81960892
steve aoki did some good stuff with ebullition records in the 90's. of course that's totally different than anything hes made since then
>>
>>81969888
Are...are you illiterate?
>>
File: kode with karlie.png (1MB, 1357x1281px) Image search: [Google]
kode with karlie.png
1MB, 1357x1281px
>KARLIE KLOSS
>>
>>81969933
I'm sure you have a source. Even then, if you did, who cares?
>>
Is global CHANGE real
>Yes. True

Is mankind speeding up/slowing down or having an impact on said change?
>Yes. I agree

Is taxing people for shit going to help?
>No

Is denying fracing/pipelines and nuclear energy going to help the climate?
>Fuck no

Should we work on other means of energy?
>Yes

Should we toss out oil/etc and force it while most likely destroying our very lives due to no power and wars due to people having thier very lives ruined for some rich faggots to make money?
>No

Also doesn't matter. China polutes the air so much that if America/Europe and say a few other countries went 10000% green, china would still be fucking shit up.

And also the climate change will be over a hundred+ years. Temperatures could go up but again 3c over a hundred years. Not that abnormal Biggest change is sea level. It could rise 20-50 feet....but over a hundred years.
>>
>>81969935
>I didn't read the article
>>
>>81969971
Can wind or solar energy run a semi or a train?
>>
>>81969620
>North Pole
>antarctic
figures your kind would have shitty reading comprehension
>>
>>81970105
I would assume so, yes. I see no reason to assume otherwise.
>>
Does anyone watch nature shows?
>>
File: liberation-party-strip[1].jpg (168KB, 658x494px) Image search: [Google]
liberation-party-strip[1].jpg
168KB, 658x494px
>>81970091
>Is taxing people
>>
>>81969971

Prove me wrong. Solar works on your house. Barely. Wind power could work if you have infinite wind. You dont.

Also Germany already tried both. And it failed.

Now could solar and wind work with better technology? Yes. But as of now they are both flawed.

>Buh buh buzzfeed and my libersl college professors told me these facts. Im right. Not the fact solar has never worked on anything bigger than a house and wind power barely touched the efficiency of oil/coal
>>
>>81970175
The collective IQ of this board is probably less than 30...no.
>>
>>81970163
lol science doesn't run on assumptions. Either prove that it can or fuck off.
>>
Scientists are just as partisan as anyone else.
They shouldn't be treated with any particular reverence as far as trust goes.

Scientists, judges, doctors, and so on. They are all just people. They should not be elevated to a special "trusted" class as if we were to believe everything they say outside of their particular domain.

Most scientists are not Galileo. They are weaklings and betas and they'll go with the zeitgeist that is being pushed by the powerful even whilst adopting this smug air because they think that they actually are like Galileo and other famous scientists who had balls enough to stick by the truth.

Lets not forget that Stephen Jay Gould, a known fraud, is a hero to the modern scientific establishment. If our scientific class were as good as they think they are, morally I mean, this wouldn't be the case.
>>
>>81958365
>privileged white males need to be exterminated to usher in an era of tolerance and scientific enlightenment

It's funny because you can't have one without the other.
>>
>>81970187
>Prove me wrong. Solar works on your house. Barely
Where are you getting this?
>Wind power could work if you have infinite wind. You dont.
You don't know how turbines work, do you?
>Also Germany already tried both. And it failed.
Citation needed.
>But as of now they are both flawed.
Again, where are you getting this info from?
>Not the fact solar has never worked on anything bigger than a house and wind power barely touched the efficiency of oil/coal
Why do you keep lying? There is literally more money in green energy jobs now but coal and oil shills hate energy competition.
>>
>>81969971
>China now has more money invested in green energy and reversing CO2 emissions more than the US. Let that sink in. "B-BUT CLIMATE CHANGE A CHINESE HOAX!"
They are still one of the most polluted countries in the world.
>>
>>81970226

It must since "science" (the meme bill nye liberal cuck globalist science) has made up false claims before

Over population was one. Global cooling. Food shortages. Y2K. Etc

Real scientist are finding ways to make better crops and studying DNA and such. Not having meme shows pushing agendas.

Bill Nye was fun for KIDS. Why is he now acting like hes a fucking Jesus of science. Hes not
>>
>>81969666
overpopulation is when a country's own resources can't provide for the population, most westernized countries are becoming more reliant on foreign import for basic needs, and despite their low birthrates, many of their populations are still growing by importing people from countries with growing populations
>>
File: Geoff_Ramsey.jpg (114KB, 500x701px) Image search: [Google]
Geoff_Ramsey.jpg
114KB, 500x701px
>>81958482
>Geoff Ramsey
why Geoff? I used to love rooster teeth.
>>
>>81965298
the left is co-opting science. and of course it's science, the discipline that actually has objectivity and is based in reality instead of feelings, which is the direct antithesis of the modern left. what a timeline.
>>
>>81970226
>lol science doesn't run on assumptions.
You aren't aware of what a hypothesis is?
>Either prove that it can or fuck off.
Look you triggered faggot, what or who has you convinced that solar or wind energies can't run vehicles? We already do that with solar, by the way. But I want an educated reason why you think green energy tech cannot be modified for transportation when Elon Musk is literally devising a combination of that right now.
>>
>>81970091
>Also doesn't matter. China polutes the air so much that if America/Europe and say a few other countries went 10000% green, china would still be fucking shit up.
Woah did I just step out of a time portal into 20 years ago? Do you actually follow any sort of news regarding climate change? China has assumed a leading role in tackling climate change in recent years, they're into big things over there at the moment.
>>
>>81970383
feels>reals
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wllc5gSc-N8
this was actually part of the show. Holy shit
>>
>>81970321
Doesn't change what I said.
>>
>>81960843
This wont happen with Thorium reactors
>>
Protip: You can tell a scientist is lying to you when they cite "consensus" rather than evidence.
Every scientific breakthrough, and literally every revolutionary discovery flew completely in the face overwhelming consensus, but that shit didn't matter because the guy in the minority could PROVE HIS SHIT.

TL;DR When climate scientists cite "consensus" or "The balance of evidence", it directly translates to, "We don't have our shit together and this is all propaganda".
>>
>>81970305
again prove that semis or trains can run on green energy.
>>
>>81958985
why does that name sound familiar
>>
File: awful.jpg (21KB, 246x237px) Image search: [Google]
awful.jpg
21KB, 246x237px
>>81970414
Jesus Christ
>>
>>81970438
>not answer a single question
Faggot, I want you to explain to me why you think the size of vehicle somehow changes the science.
>>
File: huelol.jpg (62KB, 565x478px) Image search: [Google]
huelol.jpg
62KB, 565x478px
>>81970398
>China has assumed a leading role in tackling climate change in recent years, they're into big things over there at the moment.
Like what? Solar and wind energy? Seems accurate.
>>
>>81968423
>>81968791
pls stop using pepe, you're making us look bad. not every frogposter is a deranged autist!
>>
>>81970414
>This one goes out to all the bipeds who identify as... LAAAAADIIIIIES
Titus... Get the cross.
>>
File: 1420924349726.jpg (149KB, 500x608px) Image search: [Google]
1420924349726.jpg
149KB, 500x608px
>>81970414
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>
>>81970438
you know batteries exist right?
>>
File: 1491479425831.jpg (7KB, 231x218px) Image search: [Google]
1491479425831.jpg
7KB, 231x218px
>>81970534
>not every frog poster is a deranged autist
1. Name one thing I said that was deranged
2. Are you so sure about that?
>>
That one chick on there looks like she's fucking 6'5.I'm waiting for someone to make a "6'0 - 5'9" edit of a screenshot of her next to the Indian dude from the first episode.
>>
>>81970516
>large vehicles run on the same mechanics as small.
Wew
no wonder you think nye is a scientist.
>>
>>81969616
jfc CAN YOU BE MORE OF A NEWFAG. newfagging isn't stupid if it's some board-specific meme, but this is such a fucking old and used meme. can you shareblue shills please fuck back off to reddit.
>>
>>81970526
Where did this picture come from?
>>
>>81970526
Why is Mongolia so polluted? They barely have any people living in it for its size
>>
>>81970414
I consider myself a very patient person.
Thats the first time i had to turn something off because it was too annoying. Literally one minute in and i couldnt take it anymore.
And im bisexual myself, for fucks sake.
>>
>>81970414
(((pop science)))
>>
>>81970620
You are avoiding every question and being autistic concerning what this conversation is about.
>>
File: Big Horseshoe.png (98KB, 600x867px) Image search: [Google]
Big Horseshoe.png
98KB, 600x867px
>>81960806
this very much related
>>
>>81970634
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/maps-and-graphics/most-polluted-countries/
>>
>>81970638
>The WHO tracks air quality at 1,622 locations in 92 countries - but all are urban areas. So while Pakistan, Egypt and Mongolia are among the most polluted countries according to the map below, this only refers to pollution in its cities
>>
>>81970620
I didn't realize the fucking wheel changed overnight. I didn't realize that trains and semis became magical either.
>>
>>81970623
>SHAREBLUE, REBBIT. NEWFAG, REEEE!
do you always get this mad when someone corrects your spelling?
>>
>>81970414

This is... the show? Good God please nuke Reddit with a righteous fire.
>>
>>81962227
>DUDE EXISTENTIALISM IS ABOUT QUESTIONING WHO YOU ARE

Fucking NOT existentialism
>>
>>81970103
Who the fuck reads anything? If it's not on foxnews it's not worth knowing.
>>
>>81970623
>newfagging isn't stupid if...
Stopped reading right there.
>>
>>81966749
>retards make dumbass posts
>people call them out on it
>call them redditors because he can't argue back

Every time
>>
File: 1454815502528.png (676KB, 666x666px) Image search: [Google]
1454815502528.png
676KB, 666x666px
>>81970414
I think I might actually get a gun permit and start hording food what the fuck.
>>
>>81970799
I want thee keywords "bill nye" and "libtard" to redirect you to /pol/. Or just have these threads moved there.
>>
>>81958482
Youd think Neil Degrasse would want to be included.
>>
>>81970516
>I want you to explain to me why you think the size of vehicle somehow changes the science.
This is a bit like asking why a monkey the size of King Kong can't exist.

The answer to your question in this case is Torque needed for the increased weight of the vehicle.
While not impossible, the reason there is no Solar 18-wheeler is because existing solar-to-electric engines only produce a certain pound-foot output.

Y'know how heavy vehicles all use diesel engines? That's a torque thing. And while advancements have been made in efficiency ect. ect. for electric engines, they still don't generate a lot of torque without a supporting fossil engine.
>>
>>81970799
the show is fucking awful. anyone who isn't a raging fucking faggot can see that.
>>
>>81970434
You realize that it is a consensus of data and cross-sectional experimentation done by thousands of independent researchers at different times, right? Yes, that matters for all science. You kids get hung up on terms you don't even know.
>>
>>81970891
underrated
>>
>>81970756
>thinks an hero was a spelling error
how much do you guys get paid to infest this site? or are you doing it for free?
>>
>>81970946
People here who hate it seems to mostly hate it because it says things they disagree with.
>>
>>81967768
Shrimp don't bleed...
>>
File: Screenshot_2017-04-23-19-50-57.png (830KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2017-04-23-19-50-57.png
830KB, 1440x2560px
>>81970896

>LOUISVILLE, KY — At the 2014 Mid-America Trucking Show, Cummins Crosspoint showed off how they’re using Go Power!’s Solar Flex-powered system to keep dedicated batteries in their battery-powered cab-comfort systems fully charged and ready to start equipment.

>Built-in telematics in many reefer units can completely drain their starter battery within just four days of sitting idle and that the downtime and service cost of jumping a dead battery can really add up, explained Joe Aschenbener, general manager for Crosspoint Power and Refrigeration.

http://m.todaystrucking.com/solar-power-panels-keep-reefers-going

http://gpelectric.com/HD-Truck

https://www.google.com/amp/s/electrek.co/2016/07/20/tesla-semi-truck-business-cargo/amp/

>Probably the biggest surprise to come out of Elon Musk’s ‘Master Plan Part 2’ is that Tesla is developing a semi truck set to be unveiled next year. Although completely in line with its mission to accelerate the advent of electric transport, it’s still a whole new business for Tesla.

https://electrek.co/2016/07/20/elon-musk-tesla-master-plan-part-2/
>>
>>81958365
>privileged white males need to be exterminated
what a reasonable and accurate summation of the other side's views and definitely not a ridiculous caricature that makes you sound like a whiny little bitch about beliefs that aren't yours
>>
>>81970962
>a consensus of data and cross-sectional experimentation done by thousands of independent researchers at different times
And none of it arrived at "proof". The best they can do is, "The balance of evidence strongly suggests".

The scientific method hinges on repeatability of results. If they have all of these outliers that can't be reconciled with "the balance of evidence" or otherwise explained, then they do not have a conclusion.

Idiots forget this in the age of pop science.
>>
Episode 1:

> Bill holds up an Erlenmeyer flask. The audience ooohs.
> "Now this might look like water, but it's actually an aqueous solution."
> Audience starts clapping
> Electronic dance music starts playing
> Adam from the mythbusters comes out on a scooter with colorful beakers and a lab coat.
> Bill and Adam start dancing with beakers, audience cheers
> Record scratch, music abruptly stops
> Zoom into Bill's face, "Now let's get serious folks."
> "Can you believe there are still people who believe in God, and not climate change?"
> Audience erupts in laughter, more applause
> "Folks we have a very special guest here today to tell you why space is WOKE!"
> Neil DeGrasse Tyson comes out in a space suit
> Audience furiously clapping now, can barely contain themselves
> Tyson: "The potential for life is everywhere in the universe, Star Trek and Star Wars could be real!"
> Audience hands are now bleeding from all the clapping.
> Bill: "Well that's all the time we have today, join us next week when we tell you more about why science rocks!"
> Electric guitar solo, audience starts chanting aggressively "Bill! Bill! Bill! Bill! Bill!" Their claps are now full repetitive nazi salutes.
>>
>>81971190
>And none of it arrived at "proof".
Are...are you retarded? Yes, there is literally a mountain of proof. You may just be stupid.
>>
>>81971190
>The scientific method hinges on repeatability of results
Right, and they found out that climate change is a real and substantial problem. This has been a fact for a very long time.
>>
>>81970962
In other words pseudo-science.
Bravo
>>
>>81971236
i believe it
>>
>>81971271
>literally
fuck off back to plebbit
>>
>>81971170
First section (which you quoted without reading and understanding) is talking about using solar to power the "Cab-comfort system", NOT an electric engine for driving the truck.

The second quote (which I found myself) is an announcement of intent, not relating to technology that actually exists.

That being said, there's nothing stopping someone from making a Semi-truck-shaped electric vehicle, but with current technology, it would be under-powered and unable to fulfill its role in cargo-movement.

Stop treating everything like a competition. You should have done this research FIRST.
>>
>>81971346
>maybe if I keep saying this is fake science, then it'll actually become fake science

Keep trying. Maybe I'll be convinced by one more post.
>>
>>81971236
>bill walks on stage with adam savage on a leash
>adam savage is clearly unhappy with bruises
>"folks adam came to me the other day and asked if the science on climate change is really settled!"
>loud booing from the crowd. they throw their fidget toys at adam savage in anger.
>Bill kicks adam in the stomach and he falls over and spits up blood
>crowd laughs hysterically. camera pans to audience member with snot hanging out of their nose from laughing so hard.
>"folks the science HAS been settled for a long time. We cant tolerate this type of stuff anymore. Its 2017"
>Crowd gets up out of their seats and claps extremely hard. Lots of whistling.
>"I think adam needs to check his white male privilege , not that race exists or anything , its a social construct used historically"
>black woman in mobility scooter yells "yassss bill uh huhh das right" and claps excitedly
>"thats right bill" a mysterious voice through the speakers says...
>could it be?
>the crowd is nervous , fanning their faces like southern belles
>its neil degrasse tyson
>crowd starts screaming like its an oprah screening and they all got a car.
>"race isnt real , its the most discredited scientific idea of the century"
>"but i will tell you whats real"
>The women start smiling because they know whats coming
>DEEZ
>the women are already disrobing and warming up their gross fat nerd pussies
>NUTS
>standing ovation for 11 minutes
>>
>>81971346
>constantly tested and retested data over decades, from thousands of researchers, all coming to same conclusion
>is pseudo-science
America is doomed
>>
>>81958365

Bill Nye's educational background includes:

Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering
end of list
>>
Kill all white males IMO.
>>
>>81971431
>it would be under-powered and unable to fulfill its role in cargo-movement.
You keep pretending this is true. Also, congrats for not reading past a single sentence from every link you dumb faggot.
>>
>>81971271
The actual story: Somebody told you that "The balance of evidence" is the same as proving something, and you, being a bit dim-witted, believed them.

The fact that you're falling into the pattern of "omg, ur so retarded" suggests that realizing this is causing cognitive dissonance for you.
>>
File: 1447130145051.jpg (72KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]
1447130145051.jpg
72KB, 960x960px
>>81971482

>tfw have a BS in ME
>Now it's a meme degree because Bill Nye ruined it
>>
>>81971330
I've told you what their conclusion was, and it was not proof.
Misquoting the very scientists that you worship as holy prophets does not strengthen your case.
>>
>>81971053
>doubling down because anon can't spell
>>
>>81971559
what kind of jobs do you typically get with that degree? and not fake scientist job like bill nye.
>>
File: IMG_6988.jpg (118KB, 485x775px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_6988.jpg
118KB, 485x775px
>>
>>81971559

>>tfw have a BS in ME

Teach me the intricacies of the completely unrelated field of climatology
>>
>>81971568
>I've told you what their conclusion was, and it was not proof.
But this wrong. Why are you being so fucking obtuse? It most certainly is proof, only literal retards deny it now.
>>
>>81971434
>>81971455
see
>>81971190
>>81971515
>>
File: IMG_6989.png (343KB, 494x818px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_6989.png
343KB, 494x818px
>>
>>81971496
If your quote from the links didn't betray the fact that you didn't read them yourself (as I explained before), maybe I would have opened them.

However, the fact that you are pretending that torque is NOT a physics concept and that name-calling IS an argument indicates that I've driven you into cognitive dissonance.
>>
>>81971638
not an argument
>>
File: 1492893697700.gif (749KB, 630x350px) Image search: [Google]
1492893697700.gif
749KB, 630x350px
>>81971515
I think you are caught up in an alternate reality where there isn't any hard scientific proof of climate change and where semantics runs wild. Climate change eixsts, kiddo. We have more than substantial proof for it. It's very silly to deny that this proof exists. It's not intellectual. How much does Exxon pay you to spread disinfo about scienc
>>
>>81971734
No proof that it's caused by humans.
>>
>>81971669
Still not fake science though. There's still concrete evidences and the researchers are saying this strongly suggests something but they can't be 100% sure and need to do more tests and researches.

So, one side has evidences and data to work with and the other side has shitposts and memes. I think I'll stick with science for now.
>>
>>81971669
But there is proof...
>>
>tfw I want to learn about climate change but I'm surrounded by leftists so I'm afraid of saying the wrong thing and getting arrested for denialism
>>
>>81971761
Then you are just stupid.
>>
>>81971775
Google is your friend.
>>
>>81971734

That's a very short time frame.
>>
>>81971763
>strongly suggests something
doesn't prove
>>
>>81971734
>We have more than substantial proof for it.
You have more than substantial EVIDENCE, child. Words have meanings and they matter.
You also have more than substantial evidence AGAINST, which you ignore so that you aren't "one of those retarded climate deniers".

God forbid if integrity and intelligence caused ingrates to engage in name-calling. The Horror!
>>
File: 1431499998742.gif (2MB, 275x275px) Image search: [Google]
1431499998742.gif
2MB, 275x275px
>>81970414
I'm actually stunned.
>>
>>81971703
>I didn't even look at the links
Well alright then, good talk. Also for future reference, look up cognitive dissonance. So you won't just use it for wrong situations.
>>
>>81971815

And risk clicking on the wrong link and being tracked by the FBI anti-denialism unit? Fuck that.
>>
>>81971767
>>81971804
Feel free to show this conclusive, irrefutable proofs.
>inb4 tv science guys say so.
>>
>>81971815
Jewggle sure is your friend.
>>
>>81970414
I didn't know World Peace got a second season, nice.
>>
Define "science"

What is even the context of this movement?
>>
>>81971851
>You have more than substantial EVIDENCE, child.
We have both evidence and proof lead to, by that evidence.
>You also have more than substantial evidence AGAINST
Literally doesn't exist outside of two or three anti-science blog posts or "scientists" who were nearly laughed out of their fields.
>calling me a child
One of us is disregarding scientific data, anon. It isn't me.
>God forbid if integrity and intelligence caused ingrates to engage in name-calling.
Kek, deniers aren't either of those things.

Do you give flat earthers the same attention?
>>
>>81971838
Eventually with more research and data, they do prove it.
>>
not to burst anyone's bubble but reddit doesn't seem to like this show that much either

even they realize it's preachy cringey garbage
>>
>>81971763
>but they can't be 100% sure and need to do more tests and researches.
Except that they CAN'T DO THIS in any meaningful way.

Do you realize (evidenced by this very thread) the implications of denying climate change? On a shitty image board you have idiots calling you a retard just for THINKING.
A scientist loses his funding and his career is OVER.

And you think any science which could POSSIBLY disprove climate change could EVER take place in that environment?
Its a circle-jerk in its purest form, with the scientific method completely compromised in favor of supporting "the consensus".

To my original point:
You know a scientist is lying when they cite "consensus" rather than proof.
Consensus is toxic to science.
>>
File: 15_co2_left_061316 (1).gif (21KB, 700x453px) Image search: [Google]
15_co2_left_061316 (1).gif
21KB, 700x453px
>>81971881
NASA has entire papers written on carbon emissions.

>go to google
>type in "NASA, carbon emissions"

Do you want me to do that work for you and make a comprehensive list of sources because of how fucking lazy you are?
>>
>>81971854
>This salty that you slightly embarrassed yourself
Bro, get the fuck over it.
>>
>>81971975
>t.so triggered I can't make a coherent sentence.
>>
>>81972042
Again, you don't know what a consensus means in science and why that matters. It is a consensus of DATA, kiddo.
>>
>>81972062
Correlation does not mean causation. They have yet to show the latter.
>>
>>81972081
>literally didn't bother to look at the links for the argument
>calls you the embarrassment
Right
>>
>>81972042
Science doesn't have a goal of proving or disproving something. It seeks to find out the truth of our reality. If 97% of the scientific community who have done various researches regarding the world's CO2 levels, rising water levels, increasing aridity, melting ice caps, dying reefs in the ocean, etc. agree that climate change is real, then it's real.
>>
>>81970414

>HAHA That's exactly the right message Rachel

I kind of seriously want to kill that man.
>>
>>81972097
>t. illiterate
Devos works fast.
>>
>>81972149
Yes, they did though. You just probably never bothered to look into it.

I don't get why deniers are so hellbent on refusing to read this public data anyone can go and look at. You have to be paid, right?
>>
>>81970380
He mega cucked himself
>>
>>81971962
>We have both evidence and proof lead to, by that evidence.
There you go reaching beyond even what your worshiped scientists say again.
Fuck off with that stupid noise.
>Literally doesn't exist outside of two or three anti-science blog posts or "scientists" who were nearly laughed out of their fields.
t. MSNBC viewer
>One of us is disregarding scientific data, anon.
One of us understands scientific data, anon. You are laughably plebeian in how you try to speak from a position of authority as I tell you what your own authority figures actually say.
>More name-calling
[COGNITIVE DISSONANCE INTENSIFIES]
How pathetic that you represent the current state of "Science".
>>
>>81972158
>I believe whatever they tell me and so should you goy. They've never been wrong.
Right because the "consensus" of the science community is infallible and not prone to political pressure or bias.
>>
>>81972158

That 97% was simply asked if the climate was changing. Something that even the most ardent "denialist" agrees with. I wish you people would stop using that number as if it means anything. There's many more problems with that number but I'm sure you wouldn't care.
>>
>>81972231
>"Yes they did" show's no proof.
>Why can't you just believe goy?
not an argument.
>>
>>81972117
>Words mean different things when scientists say them! Like Theory! XP
"Consensus" is not a scientific term. What kind of idiot thinks "agreeing" makes something true?
>>
>>81972267
None of this was an argument.
>>
>>81972308
>putting words in my mouth
>implying science is corrupted by some sort of political pressure or bias without any proof of it

>>81972320
97% agree that climate change is real and that humans are responsible for it. That's very significant.

>There's many more problems with that number but I'm sure you wouldn't care.
Tell me.
>>
>>81972404
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus

>Consensus is normally achieved through communication at conferences, the publication process, replication (reproducible results by others), and peer review. These lead to a situation in which those within the discipline can often recognize such a consensus where it exists, but communicating to outsiders that consensus has been reached can be difficult, because the 'normal' debates through which science progresses may seem to outsiders as contestation.[2] On occasion, scientific institutes issue position statements intended to communicate a summary of the science from the "inside" to the "outside" of the scientific community. In cases where there is little controversy regarding the subject under study, establishing what the consensus is can be quite straightforward.

This takes seconds to learn.
>>
go to imdb and downvote this it's at 7.6 with only 300 reviews

also
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/120816/george-soros-bets-netflix-alphabet-and-amazon-nflx-goog-nflx-goog-googl-amzn.aspx
>>
>>81972452
>what is climate gate
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/5/climate-change-whistleblower-alleges-noaa-manipula/
>inb4 the only source I trust is msnbc
>>
>>81972155
>Asking about solar powered engines
>Link to article about solar powered air-conditioners
Yes. Embarrassing.
You not only linked the article, your copy-pasted blurb (which you didn't even read) showed your mistake, saving me some time.
>>
>>81972452
>97% agree that climate change is real and that humans are responsible for it.

No they don't. Check the fucking source. You're the one citing that number., now validate it.
>>
>>81972362
If you haven't looked at any evidence this late in the game, there is little hope of convincing you and honestly, you people should just be ignored until you produce a real rebuttal.

Which has never happened that wasn't just a default sperg argument about "everyone is wrong because paranoia" or "don't trust data from anyone, ever because of muh conspiracy".
>>
>>81972593
see cupcake
>>81972534
>>
>>81972551
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
>>
>>81972452

There is no consensus that global warming is a man-made phenomenon that requires "urgent" action. One of the most common talking points used by global warming alarmists is that 97 percent of scientists agree that it's man-made and unless action is taken, armageddon will ensue. This is patently false, as Joseph Bast and Dr. Roy Spencer explain in The Wall Street Journal, this number comes from three sources and they're all riddled with errors

>In 2009, a University of Illinois student conducted a two-question survey for her master's thesis that asked respondents if "global temperatures have risen and that humans are a significant contributing factor." Skeptics and proponents typically answer yes to both questions, so unsurprisingly 97 percent said yes. Additionally, only 79 scientists responded to the survey.

>A student at Stanford found in 2010 that 97 percent or 98 percent of "the most prolific climate change writers" believed that "anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for 'most' of the 'unequivocal' warming." No mention on how serious the problem was, and he only found the views of 200 researchers when the number of climate change researchers are in the "thousands."

>Blogger John Cook determined in 2013 that 97 percent of "abstracts of peer-reviewed papers" believed that "human activity is responsible for some warming," but a more exhaustive study of Cook's work determined that only 0.3 percent of the 11,944 papers reviewed by Cook concluded that "human activity is causing most of the current warming."
>>
>>81972543
The first two articles were about implenenting solar panels on new refitted semis to use as an energy source...for the engine and pther subsystems on the truck...

Last one was Elon's plan to make a new line of semis powered by a combo of electric and solar fueled batteries...

I'm done here. No use if you don't even look at what your opponent shows you
>>
>>81958985
I hate that taylot swift is friends with her
>>
>>81972490
Yes. A consensus based on the "Balance of evidence".

Good for you that you want to trust those scientists (who have intentionally ostracized their colleagues who disagree with the consensus), but I'm NOT an idiot and can see the writing on the wall when men of science start spouting weasel-words.

It must be very easy to build a consensus when you systematically label all dissent as "junk science", destroying people's careers, and enforce "data consensus" through intimidation.
>>
>>81972641
What do you think that proves, kiddo?
>>
>>81972668
>likely due to human activities
not proven
>>
>>81972668

NASA is not the source of the 97% number, I don't give a fuck what they have to say about it. See: >>81972684
>>
>>81972722
Ah, the tinfoil route? Neat. I was wondering how long this dead horse would take to show up.
>>
>>81972688
Motherfucker! That's EXACTLY what I said the articles were about, and then you whined for ten posts about "Well you didn't actually READ it"

Go fuck yourself! You got blown the fuck out and none of your articles delivered on the shit you said they did.

EMBARRASSING!
>>
>>81972751
Then let's just do nothing at all amirite? Who cares! Let's shit where we eat! Fuck earth, the Rapture is soon anyway.
>>
>>81972817
>none of your articles delivered on the shit you said they did.
Well, you didn't read them though.
>>
the only comfort i take is that these people are so fucking bad and rarely create something good

see this shit and mass effect andromeda as examples
>>
>>81972751
Can you tell me what you gain by denying things that happen in reality? If nobody is paying you, what sort of reward could you possibly get?
>>
>>81972823

I'm all for doing something. But it has to be more effective than government programs that cost trillions of dollars and won't even have a significant effect on the climate.
>>
>>81972780
>le tinfoil hat meme
Protip: every time your brain shuts down and you default to petty insults, you are showing your cognitive dissonance.

Any person in this country can observe for themselves how scientists become pariahs when hey deny climate change, and any person with SENSE can anticipate the effect that would have on climate research.
This shit is not difficult, not is it even complicated.
>>
>>81972729
Science can be corrupted by political pressure or bias, cupcake
>>
>>81972914
>Fox told me they wouldn't work
You need governments on board or nothing happens at all. It's why the 22 countries coming together during the Paris Agreement were vital. You need money to do this. It's a real threat, not a boogeyman or money laundering scheme. Can you just once, think about our collective species ENOUGH so you can go back to your anime boards and cunny in peace after?
>>
sorry bill, you were only interesting when you cared about actual science 20 years ago

now i dont give a shit about you trying to be a science version of Colbert; shut the fuck up about current political climates and just try and emulate the BBC nature shit with science and make yourself humorable

he had one fucking job

goddamn nutcase
>>
>>81972823
Yes let's cost hundreds of thousands of jobs for something that has not been proven.
>>
>>81972989
Convenient that this happens with science you disagree with.
>>
>>81972906
The reward of knowing the truth of things rather than believing what is "likely" as the absolute truth, like a good goy.
>>
>>81973049
Coal and Oil as industries are literally dying, kiddo. There are hundreds of thousands of green energy private sector jobs that would help lower the cost of energy and cut down larger power monopolies
>think of the billionaires!
Kill yourself, shill
>>
>>81973004

Go fuck yourself. You're not interested in talking seriously about solutions, you just want to harp on somebody and take a moral high ground. You're useless. Are you living like you truly believe armageddon is coming? Are you stocking up on supplies and preparing a shelter well in-land?
>>
>>81972936
Then just stop denying climate change without real evidence
>if I act retarded, why do people call me retarded?

Science isn't a safe space for retards.
>>
>>81973052
convenient it never happens with science you agree with.
>>
>>81972751
>extremely likely due to human activities

>>81972757
>I don't give a fuck about what NASA and the other 18 scientific associations have to say
Sorry they're not up to your standards, anonymous poster on 4chinz.

>>81972684
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024

Here are more accurately done surveys about what percentage of the scientific community has the same consensus.
>>
>>81973109
>it's a moral high ground to accept hard scientific data and acknowledge that there is an enviornmental threat that requires immediate attention
The hoops you people go through are impressive.
>>
I just want to know how climate deniers are holding back progress?
I mean, if you want to use solar power, wind power, methane power, whatever you want, you can use it
In a free country you can use whatever the fuck you want, fuck even in America there's electricity Choice, you pay what kind of electricity you're supporting
How are climate denier holding progress? Fucking Obama gave millions of tax payers dollars to solindra and look at how well that went, what do they want?
>>
>>81973049
>not proven
But it is proven. Clean energy exists and works.
>>
>>81973161
You mean like Evolution, amirite MAGA?
>>
>>81973104
>coal and oil is dying.
>makes up 7% of the US economy
and you can't run a rig on green energy, cupcake.
>>
>>81973212

If anyone is holding back progress is Democrats. Stupid leftist shit like carbon credits, taxes, and regulations are going to do fuck all to deal with the problem. We need more natural gas, hydroelectric, and nuclear. And guess which side is opposed to them?
>>
>>81973109
>You're not interested in talking seriously about solutions
Shills like you are literally ignoring the solutions.
>>
>>81973287

Yeah I gotta pick up my big oil paycheck tomorrow. I can't wait, it's going to be a big one.
>>
>>81973246
More like the benefits of marxism, right bernout?
>>
>>81973259
>and you can't run a rig on green energy
Oh, this meme again? I like how you ignored "hundreds of thousands of private sector jobs that lower the cost of energy and break up monopolies". Trump's gonna come through with that "clean" coal any day now, right? With all those dozens of jobs!
Thread posts: 387
Thread images: 51


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.