if the next Jurassic Park film doesn't feature feathered

File: evolution was a mistake.png (2MB, 1506x1146px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1506x1146px

>>81942421
>muh feathers may may

>>81942421
OP is a scalie falseflagging
All dinosaur realists like me know that Tyrannosaurus didn't have feathers, similar to how African elephants didn't have hair, because Tyrannosaurus lived in a hot dry climate and fossils of Tyrannosaurus only showed scales

>>81942421
guaranteed (You)s

>>81942470
In your pic, Tyrannosaurus, Stegosaurus, and the Diplodocid are portrayed correctly, as they were covered in either scales or skin
Therizinosaurus in your pic is portrayed incrorrectly, as Therizonisaurs were covered in simple downy feathers

>>81942421
No one wanna see a giant chicken chasing people

>>81942421
The most recent movie mentioned this. The head researcher said that realistic dinos would have feathers, but audiences wanted scaly monsters.

>>81942421
Feather Rex looks so friendly and wise. I hope he watches over us from heaven.

>>81942636
>because Tyrannosaurus lived in a hot dry climate
Like Ostriches in Africa?
>and fossils of Tyrannosaurus only showed scales
The amount of fossilized T-rex skin found is less than the size of a US silver dollar.
However feathers have been found on other Tyrannosauroidea members. There's no reason to assume T-rex was an exception.

Suck it faggot.

no, after all they're hermaphrodyte semi frog lab freaks, with hybrids and oversized velociraptors

>>81942807
>Tyrannosauroidea
Stop baiting
You know very well that all Tyrannosaurids have been found with scales, but never with feathers
Basal Tyrannosauroids like Yutyrannus however were covered in downy feathers to survive the cold winters of early Cretaceous China

Also Ostriches were way smaller than Tyrannosaurus and African Elephant

File: 094.jpg (120KB, 720x455px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 720x455px

>>81942928
>most T-rexs found on the same latitudinal line as Cretceous China. Somehow some Tyrannosauroidea needed feathers to survive winters.
>Large bipedal birds are found with feathers in warm/hot climates, but T-rex didn't need it because it was bigger
come one

if it doesn't have any gorgonopsids, and if it doesn't go into whether they had two- or four-chambered hearts and/or a pteropsid circulatory system, i won't even bother torrenting it.

>>81942421
It doesn't make sense for a T Rex to literally be a giant turkey

Maybe some feathers around its body, like hairs on an elephant, or covered in feathers if it's a baby, but otherwise it makes little sense. A T Rex is fucknormously huge and lived in a hot, tropical region. It would die from heatstroke

File: EarlyCret.jpg (42KB, 568x303px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 568x303px

>>81943138
Yutyrannus lived in the early creataceous not late, when northern China was near the arctic
Plus because of the earth's rotation and ocean and air currents, the northeast of Laurasia would be colder than the northwest of Laurasia at the same lattitude

File: tumblr_inline_oca1nz7VL71ry5d7t_540[1].jpg (105KB, 510x347px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 510x347px

>>81942470
>Dinosaurs now

say that to this motherfuckers face and see what happens

Dinosaurs having feathers is a media conspiracy perpetuated by Universal Pictures. They are the ones who funded these "geologican discoveries" and ""research"" to change the """""scientific""""" look of dinosaurs, so they could copyright and steal the actual badass look of murderous lizards from the world. Soon, nobody will be able to depict dinosaurs as they actually were, since (((Universal))) will own it, and kids will be forced to play with faggy drag queen dinosaur toys, unless licensed by them.
Don't let these shills lie to you, dinosaurs having feathers is just a marketing scheme perpetuated by hollywood scumbags.

>>81942708
They were all covered in feathers you simp.

>>81942470
Where did everything go so wrong?

>>81943606
Fuck you, that parakeet is kawaii as fuck.

>>81942807
Nice ownage my man.
>>81942636
African elephants have hairs that they use for thermoregulation.
Everything you said is literally wrong.
You just got
B
T
F
O
Nigger.

>>81943629
Yeah but they're tiny ass hairs, it's not like they're wooly mammoth or anything

Wu said that they're not making dinosaurs, they're making monsters. And your personal opinion notwithstanding, InGen focus tested their dinosaurs and found people reacted better to pebbly skinned than feathery dinosaurs.

>>81942780
Someone needs to make a "ask Feather Rex" roll image.

>>81943665
Focus testing is some of the most retarded bullshit ever. I'm also convinced they only bring in Republitards and soccer moms for those tests.

>>81943937
They bring in the target audience, which is generally the lowest common denominator. Audiences want big teeth and big lizards, not chickens (I wouldn't be surprised if their testers called them big chickens and were turned off). The rich people who are willing to pay for a trip to Jurassic World want to see something big, huge and impressive, and feathers can detract from that (not to mention appearance upkeep, feathers can get matted and dirty so FUCK having to literally give a T-Rex a shower to make it look nice for the tourists).

They've been borrowing dna from other animals so it's not 100% dino

>>81944235
They stopped the Amphibian DNA process, though they still used stuff like Dogs for the Raptors to make them marginally more trainable.

File: 1492782557234.png (39KB, 321x322px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 321x322px

>>81942421

>>81942709
would be even more terrifying desu

>>81942421
1. This is still an area of controversy within the scientific community that is oversimplified in mainstream media. Everyone on here treats it like a forgone conclusion when in reality there are decades of research ahead before any definitive statement can be made on whether certain species did or didn't have feathers.

2. They literally addressed this in the fucking movie.