What does tv think about Michael Mann? What's your favorite

>>81900470
Based.

>>81900470
Before digital, a great stylist, though never a great auteur. After digital, a fucking mess. Ten years after he started trying to push it singlehandedly, his pure digital aesthetic still looks like aaassss.

>>81900540
He has reasons for why he does it, I believe with Miami vice where he dis a significant amount in digital he used the cameras to capture the scenery and clouds at night. Parts of the movie look cheapish, who knows if that's what he was going for exactly

>>81901022
His reason is that he has no taste. I saw that movie, it looked like ass at rhose points. He captured nothing. The digital parts look like SOV shit, because that's what they are. He thinks that if he does it persistently enough, people will eventually think it looks good. No, they won't, Michael, and that's why you're washed up.

>>81900470
>watching any Michael Mannchild flick

File: maxresdefault.jpg (138KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1920x1080px

Once upon a tiiiiiiiiiiiiime,
I was of the miiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiind.....

>>81900540
>>81901022
>>81901351
i loved Collateral and the way he used digital to capture different facets of the night in L.A.
i guess it's just a matter of taste.
I didn't see Miami Vice and Public Enemies yet. Blackhat was fantastic imo, a great pleb filter, although i admit that the animated "hacking scenes" were ridiculous...

Heat>Last of the Mohicans>Collateral>Public Enemies>everything else

>>81901820
Cause you haven't seen everything else?

>>81901922
I saw Miami Vice and Blackhat but yeah, basically.

>>81901820
Always forget that he did last of the Mohicans

well fuck now I gotta watch collateral again, thanks a lot OP