Can an actress be considered a "serious actress" if

>>81873548
Yes, but only if she sucks the dick of a major producer.

>>81873548
It depends. Half the time, a movie doesn't really NEED a nude scene.

>>81873602

nothing wrong with that.

nothing wrong with an actress who just happens to not be in movies because they didn't have nude scenes

but is she serious about acting if she requests nude scenes to be taken out or refuses roles because they had nude scenes

Nobody has to do a nude scene. Why do men not HAVE to appear nude? The nude scenes serve as nothing more than cheap titillation for the lonely, beta, virgin, pathetic /tv/ type crowd of cowardly bad breath, BO, microdick cucks who have never even held a girls hand that is not related to them.

Fuck you. No woman HAS to appear nude you manchildren. Go eat a pizza or 6 you dribble chin worms.

File: 229140484.jpg (745KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

745KB, 667x1000px

>>81873548
This is how Waterston stole MEW's career.

f.lewd.se/X4JE33.webm

File: IMG_0659.png (48KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 200x200px

>>81874288

>>81874377

she looked awful in notPotter and even more awful in Alien:C. Short hair looks bad on her.

File: 94837275.jpg (605KB, 1888x2193px) Image search: [Google]

605KB, 1888x2193px

>>81874789
what about her nips?

I enjoy nude scenes

>>81874835

from the neck up she's dead to me

I feel like an actress totally dedicated to acting should be able to do a nude scene. Problem is, actresses like that are rare.

File: 1465583279070.jpg (96KB, 608x800px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 608x800px

>>81874849
that's harsh