>fraud-u-lent http://metro.co.uk/2017/04/16/shock -report

Does anyone actually care?

>>81845807
It was dishonest filmmaking.

I doubt anyone in /tv/ ever watched the movie or the mentioned scene.

what?!
Has something like this Literally ever happened before?!
RABBLE! RABBLE!

>>81845732
Every one knew. Waiting for someone to tell you what you can plainly see is appeal to authority and people who rely on that are stupid and don't matter.

>>81845898
*nods respectfully toward you*

>>81845807
I don't. I don't usually expect the actors to film stunts by themselves. Doesn't really make the movie better or worse. Academy might care tho, considering they eat all the "method acting" shenanigans.

>>81845829
Did they ever say they did that scene?

And anyways I don't really give a shit as long as the end product is good. If it took people this long to find out it was exceptionally well done.

THE FAMOUS GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY SCENE

Like what the fuck. I don't remember anything from La La Land other than the opening where a bunch of dancers are causing a huge traffic jam in Los Angeles and nobody is shot and killed.

>>81845948
>a dance scene
>stunt
come on anon.

>>81845732
>a movie used stunt doubles
ive never seen la la land, so what is the issue?

>>81845807
I can't think of anything I care less about than this thing.
>Shock report claims
This is some buzzfeed level bullshit right here

>>81845732
dishonestkino

>>81846002
They go flying and shit with harnesses, it isn't an action movie but that's technically a stunt.

>>81845990
>>81846023
It's from a British tabloid ffs. That's part of their jargon. Don't take it so seriously.

>>81845948
Is there a precedent for this? Was someone forced to return the Academy Award?

>>81846330
Nope, and even if that was true, they can always cover their tracks by saying "we knew about that.

>breaking news: something entirely meaningless happened!

>>81845732
I thought it's obvious when it's two silhouettes dancing

Strange I thought it was an easy dance