The Office's Rainn Wilson confirmed for Star Trek: Disc

>>81720332
That isnt going to work.

>>81720332
It's been a long road, but I've finally decided that I'm not watching this.

>>81721069
>That isnt going to work.
..in making the show better?
It's the only decent casting I've seen save for the guy they got for Sarek.

>>81721098
He is type cast. I think everyone is expecting a train wreck anyway.

Do they even know what this show is about yet?

>>81722665
They have stressed diversity and transgendered representation more then plot. That says it all.

>>81722769
durr they're trying to pander to try bring in people
they know star trek nerds will watch anything star trek related
look at the box office numbers on that jj schlock

>>81722823
That's not true. I got damned love TOS, TAS, TNG & DS9. I have watched them countless times but I haven't watched Voyager in 20 years, stopped watching Enterprise half way through and only saw the first JJ movie. I will give anything Star Trek a chance but I won't continue to support it if it's shit.

At least now it's 100% objectively official it's going to suck.

>>81723386
star trek has always been progressive

>>81720332
Stay out of the original series time era damn it. Fucking parasites, write your own characters.

File: berries.jpg (24KB, 423x377px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 423x377px

>>81723451
but then they can't get those sweet memberberry bux

What are they discovering? How to get cancelled?

>>81720332
Lmao this is fundamentally post pubescent cisgender virgin male compensation for Harry Potter being done, IMO

>Recasting existing characters

Trashman will be excited for his new sacrifice.

>>81721098
They are recasting Sarek?

>>81724431
>What are they discovering?
if aliens check their privilege

>>81727634
I bet the Ferengi are behind this.

>>81720332
lol as if i needed another reason to not watch this

Remember when they'd come up with original characters and plots? Might as well be a JJverse series at this point.

File: das it.jpg (11KB, 214x195px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 214x195px

>>81727634

>>81723435
Difference between being progressive and being pandering you dunce.

>>81728822
yeah, it's pandering when you disagree with it and it's progressive when you do.