>trolley of food comes by >poor friend says his bag of

>>81653884
>sharing food with poor people
>insensitive

gee whiz you sure are smart OP

>>81653884

He's a child with no friends and he thought he could buy one. Got what he paid for too.

>>81653884

This scene was followed by harry slowly and voraciously enjoying all the treats while ron ate his mushy moldy sandwiches?

Why did harry do this?

>>81653941
Harry's friend gets to eat some decent food for a day, but gets to feel jealous of Harry forever.

>>81653999
>>81653962

Shouldve teamed up with Draco, who was just as rich and powerful as harry was, but instead decided to be friends with a feminist and a readhead

>>81654109

He'd have regretted that decision when Draco sold him to Voldemort during Fourth Year.

>>81653884
>>81654055

Don't forget to mention he just fucking took all the food. Didn't he think about all the other people in the car who could have wanted some snacks?

File: 1476775254937.jpg (1MB, 1578x2842px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1578x2842px

Did you actually expect anything more from the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

OMG HARRY IS SUCH A LIBERAL KEK LOL, EW POOR PEOPLE LOL! OMG WATCH WORLD PEACE TEEHEE

File: 1466016618123.jpg (362KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 900x1200px

Was harry a bernout?