Jesus Christ, you guys weren't kidding. I'm fucking

>>81604404

Now watch No Blade of Grass.

>>81604404
Why the fuck are you worried about N Korea? Are you edgy for the sake of being edgy? He's a shitty person and that's a country full of people that have been brainwashed. They live in shit conditions and are arrested for speaking out.

>>81604463

>He's a shitty person and that's a country full of people that have been brainwashed. They live in shit conditions and are arrested for speaking out.

Sounds familiar.

>>81604463
Still dude, the idea that nuclear war could even POSSIBLY happen has got me on edge

>>81604616
Their delivery systems are unreliable at best, whatever gets through will be shot down. Don't expect a prolonged war either, something like N Korea is going to get blitz'd
Worst case scenario, he nukes his own country before he's about to lose it causing some radiation fallout but not something we haven't dealt with before.

File: 4c24910e3154515afe5a5b76805a2bdf.jpg (19KB, 318x297px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 318x297px

>>81604404
The U.S. can target down ICBM's and not just for themselves. They have to hit such a high altitude that the U.S. could probably shoot down an ICBM for Australia and the UK at the same time.

Hate on us all you want, but we have the backs of most of you shitposter.

>>81604616
>Still dude, the idea that nuclear war could even POSSIBLY happen has got me on edge
Nuclear war has been a "possibility" for the last 70 years, if it didn't happen when the two largest superpowers in the history of the world were at each others' throats for half a century, what makes you think it would happen over some tinpot dictator? North Korea may have some (very low yield) warheads, but they have no delivery system that is capable of striking anything at long range. Most damage in a Korean war would be from North Korean artillery which is pointed straight at Seoul.

Nuclear weapons are a deterrent above all else, they keep peace.

A fucking USSR didn't nuke us but NK will?
naaah

>>81604767
>hurr durr we have your backs
Because of you burgers we have to even consider fighting shitholes like iraq, afghanistan, syria and NK. Fucking warmongering meatsacks.

>>81604404
>worried about North Korea.
kek, you have a higher chance of getting hit by lightning or a car than them launching a successful missile

>>81604404
Go watch Fail-Safe and become worried about literally everyone and about our dependance on technology which could lead to WW3 without anyone really starting anything.

>>81605177
The USSR at least was competent, while NK seems much more wild and could do something crazy if it thought that it's time was coming to a close

The second NK launch a real nuke anywhere, they would be wiped off the map by US forces in the area. Russia and China would probably help.

>you will live to see a united Korea
wew lads, what a time to be alive

File: strangelove scenes.jpg (43KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x500px

>>81605330
>watch Fail-Safe
Why would I watch the poor man's Doctor Strangelove?

I'd would probably help release tension if the us military stopped parading around south korea.
But who wants that, right?

File: Fail-Safe.jpg (88KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1280x720px

>>81605461
Yeah it's the same narrative as Dr. Strangelove, just the gut-wrenching opposite in terms of execution and atmosphere.
Also features Henry Fonda as the best on-screen american president in cinema history. The film delivers much more impact on the viewer than Dr. Strangelove, it's almost like a horror film.

Dismissing it entirely is a pleb move my friend, even Kubrick was scared it will beat him so he and his studio had to sue Lumet for taking on the same source material and he succeeded, Lumet had to release his film a few months after Dr. Strangelove took all the box office money.