>''professional'' movie critic
>''..but ultimately it falls flat''
All reviewers should be executed.
>"it just doesnt feel right"
>>81571098
what the fuck does that even mean?
>"it takes itself too seriously"
>>81573438
>it doesn't take itself seriously
>a tour de force
>[director] is back on form
>>81571098
>>81572297
>>81573360
>>81573420
>>81573438
>>81573464
>>81573473
>>81573539
lol this is soooo true =)
>>81571098
>>81573360
>>81573464
>>81573438
>"A triumph of the spirit"
>"2 thumbs up...WAY UP!"
>”It takes itself seriously just the right amount"
Put down the newspaper right there
>ok let's talk about movie X
>spend 5 minutes talking about movies it is kinda like but not really.
>>81571098
Has anyone here chosen to watch or not watch a movie based on a critic?
I tend to check afterwards so I have a smug sense of superiority at their pleb opinions.
>>81575200
I only watch movies based on what /tv/ tells me is good, so yes
>>81571098
>>81573360
>>81573438
>>81573464
>>81573473
>>81573567
Dumb frog posters need to leave
>>81575200
I don't even watch movies anymore
>>81575277
>>81575200
99% of the time.
Fuck you and all movie production companies. I couldn't care less if i miss a good movie, i'll see it on bluray.
But I refuse to pay a single fucking cent to shit-shows. I hope all the people responsible for capeshit and transformers are out on the streets. If enough people did it anyways.
>>81575200
I usually try to watch movies that are reviewed badly just to see if I feel the same.
>>81575305
It's a good chart
>>81575169
the only honest critic
>>81575200
>2017
>watching movies
>>81575200
Most movies I haven't seen because of critics are usually just adding to my confirmation bias about them desu. That said there's some movies I've seen - or in some cases, seen multiple times - just to spite certain critics.
>>81571098
>It's rough around the edges
>The movie is self aware
>The movie speaks to you on a personal level
>It's like Mullholland Drive meets The Terminator on crack
>This movie doesn't know what it's trying to be
>>81573473
What the fuck does this even mean?
>shitty opinion described with complex vocabulary stretched into multiple paragraphs to seem informed and well thought out
>>81576095
>A glib facsimile
>>81575409
for you
>'Loud' used to describe something unrelated to the audio
>>81576166
>It's loud, it's bombastic, it's everything you ever wanted
>and more!
>the lead actor gives a tour de france performance
>>81571098
Based critics:
Ayooo Scott
Kyle Smith
Click Lasalle
Rex Reed
>>81573473
>a leitmotif
>>81575615
>lt's like Mullholland Drive meets The Terminator on crack
this, or
>It's the bastard son of (X) and (Y)
>It's a romp
>it has something for everyone
>it doesn't
>>81576579
>a fun, no-holds barred romp for all ages
>"""critic""" judges a movie based on external drama rather than it's own merits
>>81575305
Luhmow toooooooo true my fellow 4channer :^)
>>81575200
I don't read reviews any more, haven't for years.
I just watch movies that look cool once a good rip comes out. Last movie I saw in theaters was some piece of shit Kevin Bacon movie I was talked into seeing with friends
Do you tend to rely more on a trailer, a 'pro' critic, or a amateur reviewer when considering a flick?
>>81573473
>a tour de france
>:O
>"OH MY GOD"
>*camera pans to shocked face*
>>81576768
amateur reviewer, if someone says they like a few movies and I like one or two i'll see the other suggestions.
I refuse to watch trailers as they usually give too much away
>>81575305
You forgot the positive opinion of snyder
>>81575305
Pretty accurate. Plebbitors will resent you for this.
Just what did this professional critic mean by this?
>>81576912
what the fuck.
she writes like a pretentious high-schooler that just found a thesaurus.
>>81573473
Kek
>>81576768
I base my motive to watch a movie on it's promo poster/box cover art.
>>81575615
best post itt
>it's a camilla long review
how can one woman be wrong so often?
>>81576934
Heres a couple more of her reviews
>a....thrilling...must see....
>"shlomo shekelburg - NY Times"
>>81576981
Her reviews are always enjoyable to read, and she's not always actually wrong.
Didn't know anyone cared about camilla on here
>>81577011
horrible critic.
[movie name] did to [noun related to Theme of the movie] what jaws did to the ocean
>>81575615
>It achieves what it set out to do, but that's not saying much.
>In an oligopsony of hypozeuxis, the film is rebarbative; the characters inveterate in their boondoggleness and tend to heavily persist in their bucolic ways.
>>81571098
>""""""""""""""""""""""""Glib Facsimile""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
>>81575615
>This movie doesn't know what it's trying to be
This one really gets me. What a vague fucking statement that could be applied by a moron to any film ever made.
>you'll love it or you'll hate it
>>81576666
Ew, I hate no holds barred romps
>>81576124
low iq
>it's another must-see Marvel masterpiece
>>81575290
Is it because there aren't proper movies anymore?
>>81577214
Fuck this in particular.
(((political statements)))
>>81581298
Biggest newspaper in my country mentioned Trump in their Rogue One review.
http://www.vg.no/rampelys/film/filmanmeldelser/filmanmeldelse-rogue-one-a-star-wars-story-mest-intense-star-wars-opplevelsen-paa-36-aar/a/23872159/
They say "it's not exactly Trump's best friends we're following here". Not even joking.
>>81571098
>ass supremely is stumbles onto a surface with little to no natural contours
would this be better?
>the movie has a lot of heart
>>81575305
I tried listening to Nerdist for a while a few months ago, but Chris Hardwick drives me up the fucking wall. It's like his entire persona is a complete facade
>>81575305
Avatar is straight garbage though
>it falls short but should be celebrated for trying
>>81573438
>>81573464
>it doesn't take itself seriously
Reminder that rewarding this is what has led us to the generic marvel movies that encourage at least 3 quips per minute and violence that carries zero impact or tension
>It's so bad it's good
>>81576768
the trailer, the summary and some stills
>>81576912
>TIME
>>81577344
if it's prefaced by saying "the tone changes all the time making you unsure what you're supposed to feel" and statements like that then I don't think it's beyond the pale to sum it up with that phrase.
>ITS INCOHERENT
what the fuck with this word ? everything they don't understand is just fucking incoherent.>>81582127
>A love letter to the series/X director
>>81578670
Kek
>>81576669
this happens all the fucking time and I'm so sick of it.
>>81582286
>it's bad, but it knows it's bad
>>81581427
>sandeep singh
>Norwegian
hmm
>>81582359
That word is fucking nonsensical when it comes to movies, I've never seen a movie I'd describe as incoherent
>>81582069
that's not bad though. Would it be inacurate to say a Spielberg film has a lot of heart? It would actually be quite informative.
>>81573473
>A return to form
>>81582416
>>81582416
>>81582367
>a love letter to classic Hollywood
Literally every La La Land review.
>A laugh out loud affair for the whole family
true kino and is only a diamond dozen
>>81575305
>needing a infographic to hold your hand when making opinions
helllllllllllllooooooo reddit!!
>>81576912
>The quality of the BvS hater.
what a pleb
>>81577011
The worst fucking part is you probably have sub 100 IQ retards who think that is an intelligent opinion.
>I grew up with
The leading lady gives a Turing Test performance
This film is vital, essential viewing.
Is Grace (our) gal /tv/?