[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

>''professional'' movie critic >''..but

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 101
Thread images: 40

File: 1439661894859.jpg (64KB, 303x303px) Image search: [Google]
1439661894859.jpg
64KB, 303x303px
>''professional'' movie critic
>''..but ultimately it falls flat''
>>
File: 1470929486296.png (114KB, 511x511px) Image search: [Google]
1470929486296.png
114KB, 511x511px
All reviewers should be executed.
>>
File: 1491985035217.png (250KB, 740x557px) Image search: [Google]
1491985035217.png
250KB, 740x557px
>"it just doesnt feel right"
>>
>>81571098
what the fuck does that even mean?
>>
File: 1478686463686.jpg (43KB, 641x491px) Image search: [Google]
1478686463686.jpg
43KB, 641x491px
>"it takes itself too seriously"
>>
File: 1486186948097.png (116KB, 412x288px) Image search: [Google]
1486186948097.png
116KB, 412x288px
>>81573438
>it doesn't take itself seriously
>>
File: 1478799608340.jpg (88KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]
1478799608340.jpg
88KB, 960x960px
>a tour de force
>>
>[director] is back on form
>>
File: HappyPepe.jpg (45KB, 244x237px) Image search: [Google]
HappyPepe.jpg
45KB, 244x237px
>>81571098
>>81572297
>>81573360
>>81573420
>>81573438
>>81573464
>>81573473
>>81573539
lol this is soooo true =)
>>
>>81573567
:3
>>
>>81571098
>>81573360
>>81573464
>>81573438

>"A triumph of the spirit"
>"2 thumbs up...WAY UP!"
>”It takes itself seriously just the right amount"

Put down the newspaper right there
>>
File: mark-kermode-011[1].jpg (42KB, 620x372px) Image search: [Google]
mark-kermode-011[1].jpg
42KB, 620x372px
>ok let's talk about movie X
>spend 5 minutes talking about movies it is kinda like but not really.
>>
File: the-critic.jpg (113KB, 780x439px) Image search: [Google]
the-critic.jpg
113KB, 780x439px
>>81571098
>>
Has anyone here chosen to watch or not watch a movie based on a critic?
I tend to check afterwards so I have a smug sense of superiority at their pleb opinions.
>>
>>81575200
I only watch movies based on what /tv/ tells me is good, so yes
>>
File: image.jpg (137KB, 717x880px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
137KB, 717x880px
>>81571098
>>81573360
>>81573438
>>81573464
>>81573473
>>81573567
Dumb frog posters need to leave
>>
>>81575200
I don't even watch movies anymore
>>
File: gotgandwhog.jpg (139KB, 750x950px) Image search: [Google]
gotgandwhog.jpg
139KB, 750x950px
>>81575277
>>
>>81575200
99% of the time.

Fuck you and all movie production companies. I couldn't care less if i miss a good movie, i'll see it on bluray.

But I refuse to pay a single fucking cent to shit-shows. I hope all the people responsible for capeshit and transformers are out on the streets. If enough people did it anyways.
>>
>>81575200
I usually try to watch movies that are reviewed badly just to see if I feel the same.
>>
>>81575305
It's a good chart
>>
>>81575169
the only honest critic
>>
>>81575200
>2017
>watching movies
>>
>>81575200
Most movies I haven't seen because of critics are usually just adding to my confirmation bias about them desu. That said there's some movies I've seen - or in some cases, seen multiple times - just to spite certain critics.
>>
File: 1484252155513.jpg (48KB, 400x384px) Image search: [Google]
1484252155513.jpg
48KB, 400x384px
>>81571098

>It's rough around the edges

>The movie is self aware

>The movie speaks to you on a personal level

>It's like Mullholland Drive meets The Terminator on crack

>This movie doesn't know what it's trying to be
>>
>>81573473

What the fuck does this even mean?
>>
>shitty opinion described with complex vocabulary stretched into multiple paragraphs to seem informed and well thought out
>>
File: reviewnegro.jpg (22KB, 300x279px) Image search: [Google]
reviewnegro.jpg
22KB, 300x279px
>>81576095
>>
>A glib facsimile
>>
>>81575409
for you
>>
>'Loud' used to describe something unrelated to the audio
>>
File: 1440233472344.jpg (20KB, 418x359px) Image search: [Google]
1440233472344.jpg
20KB, 418x359px
>>81576166
>It's loud, it's bombastic, it's everything you ever wanted
>and more!
>>
File: æææ.jpg (124KB, 1499x1124px) Image search: [Google]
æææ.jpg
124KB, 1499x1124px
>the lead actor gives a tour de france performance
>>
>>81571098
Based critics:
Ayooo Scott
Kyle Smith
Click Lasalle
Rex Reed
>>
>>81573473
>a leitmotif
>>
>>81575615
>lt's like Mullholland Drive meets The Terminator on crack

this, or

>It's the bastard son of (X) and (Y)
>>
File: 1471445422797.jpg (7KB, 248x241px) Image search: [Google]
1471445422797.jpg
7KB, 248x241px
>It's a romp
>>
>it has something for everyone
>it doesn't
>>
>>81576579
>a fun, no-holds barred romp for all ages
>>
File: 1447461903779.jpg (85KB, 338x305px) Image search: [Google]
1447461903779.jpg
85KB, 338x305px
>"""critic""" judges a movie based on external drama rather than it's own merits
>>
>>81575305
Luhmow toooooooo true my fellow 4channer :^)
>>
>>81575200
I don't read reviews any more, haven't for years.

I just watch movies that look cool once a good rip comes out. Last movie I saw in theaters was some piece of shit Kevin Bacon movie I was talked into seeing with friends
>>
Do you tend to rely more on a trailer, a 'pro' critic, or a amateur reviewer when considering a flick?
>>
File: IMG_3149.jpg (54KB, 568x407px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3149.jpg
54KB, 568x407px
>>81573473
>a tour de france
>>
File: 1463749591896.jpg (87KB, 409x409px) Image search: [Google]
1463749591896.jpg
87KB, 409x409px
>:O
>"OH MY GOD"
>*camera pans to shocked face*
>>
>>81576768
amateur reviewer, if someone says they like a few movies and I like one or two i'll see the other suggestions.
I refuse to watch trailers as they usually give too much away
>>
>>81575305
You forgot the positive opinion of snyder
>>
>>81575305
Pretty accurate. Plebbitors will resent you for this.
>>
File: SC.jpg (39KB, 746x146px) Image search: [Google]
SC.jpg
39KB, 746x146px
Just what did this professional critic mean by this?
>>
>>81576912
what the fuck.
she writes like a pretentious high-schooler that just found a thesaurus.
>>
>>81573473
Kek
>>
>>81576768
I base my motive to watch a movie on it's promo poster/box cover art.
>>
>>81575615
best post itt
>>
>it's a camilla long review
how can one woman be wrong so often?
>>
File: SC.jpg (89KB, 714x352px) Image search: [Google]
SC.jpg
89KB, 714x352px
>>81576934
Heres a couple more of her reviews
>>
>a....thrilling...must see....
>"shlomo shekelburg - NY Times"
>>
>>81576981
Her reviews are always enjoyable to read, and she's not always actually wrong.

Didn't know anyone cared about camilla on here
>>
>>81577011
horrible critic.
>>
File: IMG_3069.gif (173KB, 600x630px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3069.gif
173KB, 600x630px
[movie name] did to [noun related to Theme of the movie] what jaws did to the ocean
>>
File: 1897236513.png (48KB, 500x319px) Image search: [Google]
1897236513.png
48KB, 500x319px
>>81575615
>It achieves what it set out to do, but that's not saying much.
>>
File: i-said-hop-in.png (667KB, 768x576px) Image search: [Google]
i-said-hop-in.png
667KB, 768x576px
>In an oligopsony of hypozeuxis, the film is rebarbative; the characters inveterate in their boondoggleness and tend to heavily persist in their bucolic ways.
>>
>>81571098
>""""""""""""""""""""""""Glib Facsimile""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
>>
>>81575615
>This movie doesn't know what it's trying to be

This one really gets me. What a vague fucking statement that could be applied by a moron to any film ever made.
>>
File: 1491250603370.png (510KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]
1491250603370.png
510KB, 1200x630px
>you'll love it or you'll hate it
>>
>>81576666
Ew, I hate no holds barred romps
>>
>>81576124
low iq
>>
File: modern film criticism.jpg (10KB, 285x231px) Image search: [Google]
modern film criticism.jpg
10KB, 285x231px
>it's another must-see Marvel masterpiece
>>
>>81575290
Is it because there aren't proper movies anymore?
>>
>>81577214

Fuck this in particular.
>>
(((political statements)))
>>
>>81581298

Biggest newspaper in my country mentioned Trump in their Rogue One review.

http://www.vg.no/rampelys/film/filmanmeldelser/filmanmeldelse-rogue-one-a-star-wars-story-mest-intense-star-wars-opplevelsen-paa-36-aar/a/23872159/

They say "it's not exactly Trump's best friends we're following here". Not even joking.
>>
>>81571098
>ass supremely is stumbles onto a surface with little to no natural contours
would this be better?
>>
File: images.jpg (8KB, 272x185px) Image search: [Google]
images.jpg
8KB, 272x185px
>the movie has a lot of heart
>>
>>81575305
I tried listening to Nerdist for a while a few months ago, but Chris Hardwick drives me up the fucking wall. It's like his entire persona is a complete facade
>>
>>81575305
Avatar is straight garbage though
>>
File: 1474263871760.png (198KB, 550x535px) Image search: [Google]
1474263871760.png
198KB, 550x535px
>it falls short but should be celebrated for trying
>>
>>81573438
>>81573464
>it doesn't take itself seriously
Reminder that rewarding this is what has led us to the generic marvel movies that encourage at least 3 quips per minute and violence that carries zero impact or tension
>>
File: 1457609164822.jpg (45KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
1457609164822.jpg
45KB, 600x600px
>It's so bad it's good
>>
>>81576768
the trailer, the summary and some stills
>>
>>81576912
>TIME
>>
>>81577344
if it's prefaced by saying "the tone changes all the time making you unsure what you're supposed to feel" and statements like that then I don't think it's beyond the pale to sum it up with that phrase.
>>
>ITS INCOHERENT
what the fuck with this word ? everything they don't understand is just fucking incoherent.>>81582127
>>
File: 1437134821878.jpg (25KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
1437134821878.jpg
25KB, 500x500px
>A love letter to the series/X director
>>
>>81578670
Kek
>>
>>81576669
this happens all the fucking time and I'm so sick of it.
>>
File: 1490027638226.png (21KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]
1490027638226.png
21KB, 499x499px
>>81582286

>it's bad, but it knows it's bad
>>
>>81581427
>sandeep singh
>Norwegian
hmm
>>
>>81582359
That word is fucking nonsensical when it comes to movies, I've never seen a movie I'd describe as incoherent
>>
>>81582069
that's not bad though. Would it be inacurate to say a Spielberg film has a lot of heart? It would actually be quite informative.
>>
File: 1434774739649.jpg (173KB, 960x886px) Image search: [Google]
1434774739649.jpg
173KB, 960x886px
>>81573473
>A return to form
>>
File: 4511_8.jpg (448KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
4511_8.jpg
448KB, 1280x720px
>>81582416
>>81582416
>>
>>81582367

>a love letter to classic Hollywood

Literally every La La Land review.
>>
File: 1437394358820.jpg (9KB, 250x246px) Image search: [Google]
1437394358820.jpg
9KB, 250x246px
>A laugh out loud affair for the whole family
>>
true kino and is only a diamond dozen
>>
File: 1490843523419.gif (3MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]
1490843523419.gif
3MB, 500x281px
>>81575305
>needing a infographic to hold your hand when making opinions

helllllllllllllooooooo reddit!!
>>
File: 1486997831931-tv.jpg (145KB, 1920x1541px) Image search: [Google]
1486997831931-tv.jpg
145KB, 1920x1541px
>>81576912
>The quality of the BvS hater.

what a pleb
>>
>>81577011
The worst fucking part is you probably have sub 100 IQ retards who think that is an intelligent opinion.
>>
File: JUST STUCKMANN.jpg (95KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
JUST STUCKMANN.jpg
95KB, 1280x720px
>I grew up with
>>
File: smalllogo.png (8KB, 176x176px) Image search: [Google]
smalllogo.png
8KB, 176x176px
The leading lady gives a Turing Test performance
>>
File: 1492011407984.jpg (166KB, 393x957px) Image search: [Google]
1492011407984.jpg
166KB, 393x957px
This film is vital, essential viewing.
>>
File: 1280x720-WSX.jpg (81KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
1280x720-WSX.jpg
81KB, 1280x720px
Is Grace (our) gal /tv/?
Thread posts: 101
Thread images: 40


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.