Will we ever get a perfect collaboration of technology, artistry

>>81246165
Nope.

File: trex roaring.webm (2MB, 1280x688px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x688px

>>81246185
There must be some hope for this industry out there, aren't there any people out there willing to go above and beyond the call for special effects left?

I wish, but no. Closest we're getting lately are Wachowski projects and Valerian.

>>81246325

Nope. That requires creativity and talent. Something (((hollywood))) doesnt invest in

>>81246165
interstellar fits perfectly in that description, but you cant mention nolan without casting a shitstorm in this board

>>81246690

true

honestly even if i despise it and it has some major unrealism in the first parts and some minor ones in the later parts Gravity is pretty damn accurate from a scientific standpoint

File: trex eyes.webm (3MB, 1280x688px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x688px

>>81246690
Although I wasn't the biggest fan of that movie, I would agree with your sentiment.
It had some really fantastic special effects and has probably the closest feeling to being in space since Alien.

File: trex lawyer.webm (2MB, 1280x688px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x688px

Who was in the wrong here?

>>81247023
shieeet these HD webms are making the nostalgia goggles fall off, the skin texture on the T-Rex is not as great as I remembered it

>>81246690
>but you cant mention nolan without casting a shitstorm in this board
Well OP did specify "artistry," so yeah no.

File: trex malcolm.webm (2MB, 1280x688px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x688px

>>81247378
To be fair the film is a quarter century old and was made when CG was in its infancy (personally I think most of the CG still looks great especially pic related).
You should watch the actual blu ray version though, this is just a shitty yify rip.