>it's a Kim Kardashian reference
>this is the official title
>movie poster is supposed to look like a mobile app, I guess?
>not just called "Wreck-It Ralph 2"
>this is the official title
Thanks, Bob Iger
>>81178549
>he thinks "break the internet" is a kim kardashian reference
how's middle school?
>>81178549
>>it's a Kim Kardashian reference
No.
my wifes son is gonna love this!
>>81178549
>Break the internet is a Karashian reference
Are you literally underage?
>>81178549
>>it's a Kim Kardashian reference
What?
>>81178573
>>81178580
>>81178610
>>81178637
I typed "break the internet" into Google and 9 out of 10 results are Kardashian-related.
Even if it's not an intentional reference, people are still going to make the association. See here: http://people.com/movies/wreck-it-ralph-kim-kardashian-break-the-internet-memes/
And even if Kim Kardashian had never been born, it would still be a dumbass title.
>>81178662
lol, looks like we got a /mu/bitch who stayed here after the board unmergered. Run along little retard, back to your other rejects.
>>81178765
Not a /mu/ or /tv/ regular, but I didn't think this board would be the type to get triggered over a celebrity's name.
I stand by my belief that this movie's gonna suck.
>they didn't just call it Super Wreck-It Ralph
Dead on arrival
If you haven't noticed, Disney has been putting out nothing but trash lately. This movie will suck like the rest of their 20016-2017 lineup.
Prediction: the villain will be a social media platform which is trying to gain wider control over society by collecting users' personal data without consent, and Ralph has to save the day by launching some sort of super-virus that destroys the spyware on everyone's phone, and/or starring in a viral video about the importance of privacy settings
Also, the phrase "dank meme" will be used at least once
>they find the rule 34 scene
>>81179028
Except the fact that arguably their two best modern films were both released in 2016?