What do you think of Sally Draper's taste in movies? h

>unirocnically liking Eraserhead

File: 1488589208851.jpg (18KB, 483x701px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 483x701px

>>81035997
im gonna rrrrrrub ya out see

File: 1363416286213.gif (830KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

830KB, 250x250px

https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/baymaxs-five-favorite-films/

>The Blackcoat’s Daughter opens on Friday, Mar. 31, 2017 in limited release and On Demand.

Didn't this come out like a year or two ago?

>>81036118
Yes, it was pretty bad.

eraserhead and ferris both good choices

the shining and sorcerer's stone are unironically bad

Anorexia

>>81036333
Stop making fun of her.

File: memes.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>81035972

>she will never be your daughter

>>81035997
I feel people just say they like it to impress people or to look patrician

>>81036946
I unironically enjoy Eraserhead.

File: bait.jpg (1MB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1623x2886px

Perhaps she should consider Draping a noose around her neck for liking one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: 1478853273973s.jpg (7KB, 250x230px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x230px

Looks too tryhard, most film lovers front about their favorite movies when in reality is something like a Tarantino film.

>actually liking Eraserhead

I appreciate it, but I will never watch it again in my life, way too scaring for me.

>>81038151
Harry Potter's on her list, I don't think she's trying to pretend to be more patrician than she is.

>>81038204
yeah I guess, but am I the only one who cant enjoy The Wizard of Oz?

Its used in just about everything, its referenced to hell, all the songs were driven into the ground, I can find no enjoyment from it.

>>81038264
I would hope you are, but no, there's certainly more of you outside

>>81038248
she got into that whole model/fashion scene and stopped eating until she turned into a hateful skeleton.

File: hqdefault.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

>>81038248
I don't blame you for deleting that ridiculous post.