Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: 1485307992370.jpg (106KB, 630x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
106KB, 630x1200px
>Scorsese: If you go back and look at the contemporary reactions to any Kubrick picture (except the earliest ones) you'll see that his films were initially misunderstood. Then, after five or ten years came the realization that 2001 or Barry Lyndon or The Shining was like nothing else before or since.
Could this be said about any modern working director and his films right now? If so, who?
>>
David O. Russell
>>
Hideo Kojima.
>>
I cant think of anyone
>>
Snyder.
>>
R. Silfredi
>>
>>80960826
Seltzer and Friedberg
>>
Abrams, J.J.
>>
>>80960826
>Barry Lyndon
how can this be misunderstood? it's just a story. there is no deeper meaning or message or so.
>>
Shyamalan
>>
File: 1490478015387.jpg (33KB, 480x384px) Image search:
[Google]
33KB, 480x384px
>>80960978
This.
>>
>>80960978
This unironically
>>
>>80961052
How can you even be this pleb. Holy shit just fucking kill yourself
>>
Guy Ritchie
Martin McDonagh
Christopher McQuarrie
>>
Staying with Scorsese, I think in 20 years Wolf of Wall Street and Silence will be more highly regarded than now. I don't know about other directors.
>>
>>80961052
Iirc it was critically panned upon release.
>>
>>80960826
>Implying Pauline Kael isn't right about everything all the time and ever needed to see a movie more than once
Kubrick is a meme.
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3