>tfw you lived long enough to see your favorite childhood

>>80916018
They made supernatural herstory

>>80916018
>I watched this today
>it was pure shit

just as bad as everyone says

>>80916018
>to see your favorite childhood film turned into SJW trash

no, the film you loved as a child is literally unchanged

they made a shitty reboot, what a shame you can't tell the difference, sperg

Yeah it's a shame they deleted all the old films in order for the new ones to be made.

Who cares, in a couple years no one will remember it exists.

>>80916018
>muh childhood

Maybe you should off yourself

File: 1462509680395.png (22KB, 638x296px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 638x296px

based feig doesn't care what you neckbeards think

>>80916074
Ruins the chance of getting sequels that are good, sure the originals are untouched but this means it's unlikely to get any more and that's disappointing .... Try harder to be a jack ass

>>80916018
>/tv/ - my personal blog

>>80917820
The original already had a sequel. You think they were going to make even more?

>>80916688

When you remake/reboot a movie with the same title, you're attempting to do just that.

I know this latest Ghostbusters was sony feminist trash headed up by Melissa McCarthy the angry fat woman whose self hatred colors literally every project she does.

But in the end you people need to stop being so concered with "ruining" your childhood. It is a movie from decades ago that was fun back in the day. You can put a blu ray in and watch it in just the way you supposedly saw it in the movie theater.

Also the point is lost on all of you that the reason why these "movies from your childhood" are being remade is because most people your age have children of their own and it is kind of fun to take them to a reboot of some old 80s classic.

>>80917885
They would have if Amy Pascal hadn't sabotaged it to make the 2016 piece of shit.

People didn't even need a "sequel". Something like Extreme Ghostbusters would've been fine but even that's impossible now

>>80917819
>As opening day approaches, Feig can’t help but think about the stakes of making a $150 million movie. “A movie like this has to at least get to like $500 million worldwide, and that’s probably low,”
>Box office: 229.1 million USD

OY VEY

>>80917901
Rambo didn't need to be remade. Nor did Rocky.

Both have had sequels and/or follow up films long after the originals which introduced new people to them while keeping original fans happy.

The reason these things get remakes is name recognition. That's it. Saying it's because "you've got kids of your own now" is giving them too much credit.

Do you think Beauty and the Beast needed a live action remake when the original animated movie is still playing in cinemas packed with children frequently or do you think it had more to do with the billion dollars Disney is likely to make from it?

>>80918068
All films not made in North Korea or Cuba are made specifically to make money.

>>80916018
The original will have the last laugh because it still be considered a classic for years to come while this will be lost to the winds of time and be forgotten

>>80918123
Films there are made for social capital which is a kind of money.

>>80918456
The point being all your favorite movies were just made for a quick buck too. Studios do what is profitable.