/tv/, please explain to me how bad movies are made. Like how

sometimes you don't recognize your own shit
and sometimes you just don't care

File: 1479932143285.png (96KB, 594x579px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 594x579px

>>80819073
Are you not a burger? A film's artistic integrity doesn't mean shit so long as it generates more shekels. That or money laundering.

>>80820992
Movies aren't actually a very good way to launder money, at least not the ones that actually get finished.

Go look at chris-chan.

He thinks the stuff he writes/draws is great. But hes retarded so hes a bad example.

Basically when you're too close to a project you can lose perspective.

Also people who don't give a fuck and just want the money.

>>80819190

Sometimes your own shit smells good

>>80821177
This From the words of people in the industry, "if you're making a movie and think it's the funniest/best thing ever, it's going to be terrible" "you should never be having fun"

Obvious exceptions

>>80819073
A lot of good talent gets roped in to doing shitty movies because of contracts. In order to get one movie made, you have to agree to do another movie as well. Even if that movie is complete shit.

As for how those shit movies get into production in the first place? There's may ways. It may have actually started out as a good idea, but was plagued with delays and changes, it might be a case of focus group thinking, a cynical attempt to cash in on a trend, or it might just be someone's pet project that they're bound and determined to get made because they're too close to it and can't see it for what it really is.

>>80821320
>It may have actually started out as a good idea, but was plagued with delays and changes, it might be a case of focus group thinking, a cynical attempt to cash in on a trend
Bland movies
>>80821320
>it might just be someone's pet project that they're bound and determined to get made because they're too close to it and can't see it for what it really is.
Bad movies

>>80821320
>As for how those shit movies get into production in the first place? There's may ways. It may have actually started out as a good idea, but was plagued with delays and changes, it might be a case of focus group thinking, a cynical attempt to cash in on a trend, or it might just be someone's pet project that they're bound and determined to get made because they're too close to it and can't see it for what it really is.
Also, nepotism

>>80819073
Shit idea, convinced it's good, are able to convince others it's good
Either that or greed

Actors sometimes do shitty movies for the easy paychecks and honestly just for the lulz.

I'm pretty sure the only reason anyone does Transformers movies is as a joke.

It's a living