>Not Luna This is when i knew Harry could not be redeemed

>>80800502
the fact the he chose ginny is very freudian

literally who

File: Ginny_x_1000x0.jpg (775KB, 1000x1426px) Image search: [Google]

775KB, 1000x1426px

>>80800579
>ywn prime Ginny lusting after your wizards staff

>>80800502
Luna is a fucking retard and an autist and the only one who like her are ten of you. She and harry never had anything going more than friendship because she's a fucking nutter and babble rambled all the time it.

File: 1489592588835.jpg (1MB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1623x2886px

For me, it's when he decided to be a character in the dullest franchise in the history of movie mcchicken. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>80800691

but loony luna probably fucks and bucks like a champ. ginny is a feminist that won't take it on the face.

>>80800708
ever tim

>>80800748
Looney*
Not an arguement and it would be like fucking an actual retard.

File: confused dog.jpg (17KB, 313x286px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 313x286px

>>80800863
At least they have some form of chemistry and are entertaining watch. Luna is also a qt.

>>80800708

wtf do you want from people bot?

>>80801740
entertaining to watch*

>>80800708
This list is just retarded

Harry Potter isn't literature, it doesn't claim to be literature, so of course its shit tier literature.

It's a fucking kids book.

You might as well put Family Guy at the bottom of a tier list of classical dramas.

>>80801740

she's not so cute now I'm pretty sure

>>80801740
Ginny and harry had more chemistry in chamber of secrets. She could still get in in 5 and 6 kind of cute. Both looked like shit in 7 and after