What purpose do they honestly serve? Aren't most of them

>>80741544
I'm a bitter nerd that failed to make it into the business. How can I get paid to review movies?

>>80741544
You're a fucking idiot.

>bitter nerds who failed to make it into the industry
Project harder.

For the last fucking time, Rotten Tomatoes is a review AGGREGATOR. What's that you ask? It aggregates all the reviews from internet and printed publications and presents them as a percentage based off the people who thought the film was good or bad (in other words fresh or not).

I can only imagine a dumb fucking idiot like you, who doesn't even know how the fuck Rotten Tomatoes works, would be jealous of the stupid critics that write reviews.

And if you don't know why critics get paid by publications to write movie reviews, then you are dumber than I thought. In that case seriously consider ending your life.

>>80742010
This is the type of informative post that still inspire me to come on /tv/ everyday. That makes a lot of sense.

File: Scooby-Dum.png (1MB, 1412x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1412x1080px

>>80742010
oh man. so harsh. so serious.

Come on face the facts, if movie critics opinions actually mattered than people wouldn't go to see 99% of the films made today. I can't remember the last time I saw a comedy movie get higher than a 60% on RT.

And yes I AM AWARE that it is an aggregate of opinions of people who get paid to tell you whether a movie was good.

The problem is that very few of these people don't have an agenda or are actually equipped to discuss whether a film was good or not.

More often than not they are PAID to HAVE an opinion rather than being paid to EXPRESS one.

So I ask you friend, what is the POINT?

>>80741544
The value of art depends on the values of the art critic. Most art is born as imitation, not innovation. The critic, not the artist, is the one who defines innovation, and rates it. The artist is merely a vehicle for the aesthetic/ideology of the critic.

The critic is the real artist.

>>80741544
There are people that can't decide what movies to see without someone else telling them to see said movies. That's how critics have jobs.

>>80741544

The purpose is to offer a simple way to make money for jews who have no skills, 90% of the 'professional' reviewers are jewish.

Also, being jewish they jump on whatever the jewish agenda du jour is, which currently means 'white is priviledged and bad'.

>>80741544
I don't bother with critics reviews anymore, going off audience score is a lot better

File: 1489681620173.jpg (209KB, 1136x728px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1136x728px

>>80741544
>A subsidiary of Buzzfeed

gee, I wonder...

>>80742010
Why are the scores so different from Metacritic scores though?
Isn't it because they include a fuck ton of reviews from questionable sources like obscure websites?