Why the fuck do old films look completely different to new ones,

film/digital

>>80458789
>Also until the 60s why did they talk in unnatural british accents I have never heard in real life.
Language evolves. In 50 more years, people will be talking completely differently than they do now.

>>80458806
So does the film deteriorate? Would old films look as crisp as something current when they were released?

>>80458789
>aesthetics
see
>>80458806

>unnatural British accents
Film is a direct descendant of theater. The "overacting" of early movies is more akin to what you do on stage, with the large, expressive movements and devilry. Shakespearean theater actors were considered the best of the best and accent imitation was probably unconscious.

>60s - 70s everything changed
Marlon Brando

>>80458789

Film keeps evolving for better or worse.

In the next few decades all dialogue will be memes and emojis. Produced by people your age or younger who know absolutely nothing beyond their iphone's contents.

>>80458789
Honest Answer: http://vocaroo.com/i/s1T0yorYQcGO

>>80461434

TLDL
>Technicolor makes colors look weird
>An artificial 'Transatlantic' accent was used in movies and sounds weird

Why the hell did you feel the need to Vocaroo your response, Mr Galifianakis?

>>80458806
Digital isn't inherently different looking, it just gives you more flexibility, and people feel it's a waste if they don't use that flexibility. So you get ugly color grading because colorists have to justify their existence, and short takes because coverage is cheap and editors need work.

It's like early color film making everything ultra-saturated. Eventually people will realize they have bad taste and move on.

>>80461657
i don't honestly know

>>80461434
fuck you

File: 1487565832464.jpg (28KB, 511x412px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 511x412px

>>80462013
oh, sry

>>80459259
Wrong.

It's called the Mid-Atlantic accent. It's a distinctly American accent that has worn down a lot, why it sounds british to Op is beyond me.