>there are """""""people"""""""

>>80451063
To be fair, I doubt film criticism was all that developed in 1939.

>star trek 2009 is the 85th best movie of all time
>la la land is somehow 82

I didn't bother scanning closer to 1

I hate rotten tomatoes.

You shouldn't use a site or critic you like or dislike to prove to people the quality of a movie, and that's all its there for.

Use your own perspective from watching it, rather than glibly waiting for 'critics' to call it good or bad.

Every time a movie releases its either rapturous joy and laughing, or angry disagreement on here. If you'd just do some thinking for yourselves and watch the movies the board quality wouldn't be so low.

I'd honestly compare it to weeaboos that don't actually watch anime.

>Mad Max Fury Road #4
>Inside Out #7
Ok I'm mad

>>80451063

>36. Selma
>37. Toy Story 3
>41. Moonlight
>48. Up
>63. Finding Nemo
>85. Star Trek

>>80451472
Kill me....

>>80451472
Moonlight is bad because they're black lmao

>>80451545
>Moonlight should be in the top 100 film of all time because they're gay and black lmao

File: White expresses disgust.jpg (14KB, 600x560px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 600x560px

>>80451545
>moonlight is good because they're black gay and suffering lmao

How about a top 100 by Avg. Rating?

Don't know why people give such a shit about the Tomatometer.

>>80451830
that's what it is, do you even have eyes

>20. Get Out

how low will it go, though? it can't stay that high.

>>80451063
Literally every top 10/50/100 or whatever I've seen is cringe.
The only exceptions are some I've seen on fucking /tv/

File: The Gay Republican Negro.jpg (94KB, 300x279px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 300x279px

>>80451830
>they don't even have an "audience rating" top 100

File: armond-white.jpg (24KB, 416x540px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 416x540px

*blocks your SJW propaganda*

>>80451861
I lost my eyes in Nam.